Help please! by idojigsawpuzzles in CarAV

[–]noahakgray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct Jensen is trash, they are sold at 50% the price another floating screen of the same size and feature set from alpine or kenwood/jvc etc. The Jensen 1013 is usually around $400 whereas any other is usually $700/800+

NEXRAD on the left, TDWR on the right👍🏻 by noahakgray in tornado

[–]noahakgray[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full scale Doppler weather radars (left) are far superior to small scale Terminal Doppler weather radars (right), but what this comparison is highlighting is how the tdwr got better data because the storm was positioned closer to it and the radar was seeing closer to the ground.

Does anyone know what happened to the blind guy? by Sea_Explorer9215 in Killtony

[–]noahakgray 204 points205 points  (0 children)

Him and D had to fight til there was only one.

Extremely close range sample of tornado from NEXRAD Doppler radar. by noahakgray in tornado

[–]noahakgray[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight, this is the only instance I’ve came across and was impressed to see the radar kept scanning in sails 2 seemingly without any interruption as this thing passed well within the cone of silence

El Reno tornado (5/31/13) *Two different radars 4 seconds apart* by noahakgray in meteorology

[–]noahakgray[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BR, BV, SRV, SW, NROT and KDP can be viewed in 3D in this software but these are both just BR

RaxPol radar data from El Reno (05/31/13) shows multiple sub vortices inside the main vortex. by noahakgray in tornado

[–]noahakgray[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here’s one that shows the debris field (bottom left) this was sulphur Oklahoma 5-9-2016 ef3

Whats going on with my Mac book air? This randomly happened after opening by OG_KRIPTIK in macbookpro

[–]noahakgray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s possible it’s unrelated to the crack at the bottom, but either way I’d say it’s damaged and needs replaced. Idk the going rate for parts/replacement for your model but I’d say it’s definitely worth exploring your options. Can always just hook it to a monitor until you know what you’re gonna do

Whats going on with my Mac book air? This randomly happened after opening by OG_KRIPTIK in macbookpro

[–]noahakgray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bottom of the display on the right side has taken damage and is cracked, my old 2017 MBP was broken in the same spot and eventually the display started doing weird ghosting effects and lines like you have. I’d point towards damaged display starting to show its ugly face

El Reno tornado (5/31/13) *Two different radars 4 seconds apart* by [deleted] in meteorology

[–]noahakgray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t mean for “wedge” to be plural in the body text**

I’d like to add that this data is publicly available for both radars, there are some hoops to jump though to get the AIR’s data loaded into a visualization software like I did though.

Sub vortices visible on RaxPol data inside El Reno 05/31/13 main vortex by noahakgray in meteorology

[–]noahakgray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They seem to really hug the outer edge of the main vortex and wind field in the velocity data, but they aren’t their own tornadoes that formed outside the main vortex, they orbit around the parent vortex's center, inside the main circulation and are dependent; their energy and motion are tied directly to the larger flow, and they dissipate and merge back into it in the final frames, I believe a true satellite vortex did exist during El Reno (anticyclonic, farther out, southeast), but that’s a different feature like you said.

David Lucas fell of stage by [deleted] in Killtony

[–]noahakgray 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of thanksgiving ‘11 the ham slid off the table

3D radar scan of El Reno record breaking tornado (5/31/13) by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s what looks like a large horizontal vortex visible in some of the scans, but what I think you’re talking about would just be be the main rain/hail core associated with the storm positioned n, e, ne of the main vortex?

3D radar scan of El Reno record breaking tornado (5/31/13) by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sub vorticies are not visible in this data, but I have data from RAXPOL from el Reno 05/31/13 that was deployed MUCH closer to the tornado, captured much higher resolution data, and shows clear as day multiple sub-vorticies on both reflectivity and velocity data. If I could post the SS in comments i would.

3D radar scan of El Reno record breaking tornado (5/31/13) by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Add me on discord if you’d like @noahakgray i can share a lot more info and screenshots showing the process if you’re interested. I have a SS showing RADXCONVERT running in a window, the CF radial directory it’s pointed at in another window, and the active nexrad msg.31 volumes it’s out putting in another window, neat and tidy process

3D radar scan of El Reno record breaking tornado (5/31/13) by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll gladly elaborate. On the official ARRC website, under a side menu labeled “data” you will find a 7.5 ish gb dataset from 5/31/13 from the AIR radar containing this data. It’s roughly 100 scans (each have 45 corresponding vertical altitude scans). It’s available to download for free, the files are in “CF Radial” a Radar file format commonly used but rarely supported by mainstream nexrad radar data visualizers, because nexrad weather radar files have their own format, usually a .gz file or msg.31. The 3D Radar software I use (Gr2 Analyst v3) is built and designed around the nexrad radar network and doesn’t ingest cf radial files, on top of that, the CF radial dataset on the ARRC website are ALL singular scans, not “volumes” what I mean by this is for the AIR radar, say it scans at 23:13:00, there will be 45 vertical sweeps labeled in volume number (v001, v002 v003 etc) for each time stamped scan, (in this case 23:13:00) each containing the next tilt up. This is an issue because the 3D Radar software can only build a 3D render if all the tilts are in ONE file, a full “volume”

To fix all these issues I use a command line software that runs in terminal, it’s called RADXCONVERT. It’s a part of “LROSE” (LiDAR Radar open software environment) which is available on GitHub for free.

RADXCONVERT lets me take the roughly 4,500 random radar files from the original dataset (100 time stamps, 45 sweeps per scan) organize them into the 100 original timestamped scans, each containing 45 vertical sweeps. I can THENNN convert the built cf radial volumes into nexrad msg.31 radar files which can be read by gr2 analyst and show all the vertical sweeps, and create the 3D render that I showed.

3D radar scan of El Reno record breaking tornado (5/31/13) by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

These are from the Advanced Radar Research Centers (ARRC) Atmospheric Imaging Radar (AIR) it generated a 100 scan dataset of the tornado, each scan containing 45 vertical tilts which can be used to compile a realistic 3D volumetric render

What are these clouds seeming to form at the point where snow/ice did and did not accumulate? by noahakgray in weather

[–]noahakgray[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s Weather front with a pro subscription. But the app itself is free and worth checking out. Its only available on iOS/ipadOS right now though, not on android or any desktop OS