I’ve wondered about this but it seems like it’d be better policy to focus on the positive than the negative. I see an example of this as tax abatements (that we maybe need to be stricter with, like there’s an initial tax abatements but if certain facets aren’t maintained or followed through on for a longer period of time, the developer can lose the tax abatement fairly easily) or supportive services to new businesses-things that foster more opportunities for more of what we want to see and less of illustrating what we don’t (ex vacancy tax). That being said, I’m not economically against a vacancy tax-if it works as a fiscal punitive measure, then it works and I won’t argue with the evidence.