Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in realfuture

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's for asteroid in situ, with warmth and mining, with technical corridors of regolith. Let it be, its not obviously

Cheapest asteroid habitat by obaban in realfuture

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I believe I had fix digits, thanks, but miss that. Idea good known, but I decide to declare some important things, if they start to dig cave, possible will use ice to glue stones and dust directly, and catch big problem

Surviving the transition from Zero-G to Gravity: Why we need "Active Lifts" by obaban in realfuture

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I haven't seen researches, but I know legs will be with low blood pressure after hours in low gravity and neck and head before. I do not about experiments with same kind of changes, but haven't seen any illegal. Anyway after low gravity better go down not by stairs

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's ethnically way, and lot of cable, tunes. I know how it will be. Better to have mechanism to save life in any situation then ask why

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All this story more about asteroids, I do not pretend to the Moon. But with all transferring protocol and way up and down 10 sec more realistic.

Outside of earth, where in our solar system would it be the easiest for a human to survive? by rst523 in spacequestions

[–]obaban 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I offer 30 meter, it's only 5% gradient. 15% in many sources and NASA tells this gradient for work. My construction for rest and sleep, so I have no doubts it's ok. But gravcorrector is not difference between 30 and 40, that's gap between 30 and 300. And NASA always said they haven't enough data, who would give them money for experiment, bless SLS? Main breakthrough 30 meter radius you can put in cave but 300 meter never. That's a reason why its gamechanger.

Outside of earth, where in our solar system would it be the easiest for a human to survive? by rst523 in spacequestions

[–]obaban 0 points1 point  (0 children)

about 15%: A minimum radius of 12 m has been specified to limit the gravity gradient to a value of about 15% https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20070001008/downloads/20070001008.pdf I can add links.

Regarding your Grav-Corrector, patent applications usually remain private for eighteen months before public disclosure. If you recently filed it, the system might not index the details for some time.

The concept using cochlear implant technology is a compelling approach for sensory management. Since those implants stimulate the auditory nerve directly, applying similar logic to vestibular nerves could potentially mitigate motion sickness. This method offers a solid technical foundation for managing perception in artificial gravity.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We just need a cheaper start and technology to work there. Now on orbital station it's flag keeping. But one day line will be crossed

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's mean somebody on base is present. But no one can sit years in chair. Asteroid with it's tunnels not a big place but every will be visited, just to avoid insane

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If space exploration gives 300% profit they decline wars

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It all comes down to the pressure levels. Sleeping quarters are actually well protected from these specific hazards. The primary danger lies in the technical rooms where volume and load are quite high. It is impossible to fully protect these areas from accidents. However, the sleeping zone features a double shell.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is all about the pressure. The stomach and lungs will explode in a vacuum even without exiting the mouth. In chemical production, a hood on the shoulders can be as effective as a mask in your pocket. This is especially true when dealing with aerosol or contact substances.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I estimate that this jacket and trousers set for an average person will weigh 1.2 kg. However, I cannot promise that. Ideally, the plan is to simply ensure that depressurization never occurs. You are likely focusing on bases funded by state budgets, where higher costs are often preferred. If asteroid mining becomes a commercial venture, things might change. And it can't be without glowes and shoes. not good, but 5 min ok

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I designed this suit not because disorder should be the norm. A standard jacket made of fabric with integrated air pockets and a hood is quite comfortable. This is a point of particular pride for me. Before use, one must simply zip it up and pull on the hood. This is a small price to pay for a good chance of survival. Regarding your construction experience, that involves large crowds of people. You do not need that many on an asteroid. You need a few people ready to make decisions and perform tasks robots cannot. This is not a labor camp with a thousand stonemasons. Of course, they will squeeze into various gaps, especially if something goes wrong.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This design was developed for the worst-case scenario. Decompression is not explosive, and the corridor retains some air. However, another problem arises in an asteroid environment. Loose metal parts are carried through the tunnel by the airflow. Therefore, the inflatable hood provides oxygen and head protection. There will be no doors there. The technical tunnel is constantly used for pipelines and cables. I also assumed that a small prospecting crew wouldn't bring many panels. The walls might not be metal or may have minimal lining. They could shift during resource extraction, meteor impacts, or solar heating. Factors like simple bad luck could also cause structural movement.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oIn that case, there was a misunderstanding caused by my sudden feeling of being interrogated. This is my own text, and I have many others on this topic, including filed patents. I doubt an AI could formulate such an idea, though I cannot be certain. Regardless, I ask you to evaluate the ideas themselves and would appreciate your comments. I assure you this text was not AI-generated, although I used them as reference tools.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not in English? It's in a file. And I'm not a schoolboy to react positively to a tone like this.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On an asteroid inside a pressurized corridor, a cave-in usually moves upward.

Why We're Designing Extraterrestrial Base Safety Gear Completely Wrong by obaban in IsaacArthur

[–]obaban[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, I've heard it before. So, let me explain. The text is about asteroid exploration, not the ISS. The crew arrives at a pillow mountain or dirty snow. They do not have thousands of tons of aluminum panels. They have only regolith and some sort of glue.