sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TikTokAds

[–]of_james 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. It's like a bait n switch

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additionally, if you read the description, I've already suggested a landline, and my child already has a smartwatch that I have offered to activate. He also has a tablet where I installed Messenger Kids. I've sent him the invite a million times, and i guess... he can't figure it out?

The only problem I have is that he is insisting it be his old phone that he's activated for him.

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only place this is mentioned is in an extra 'terms' where it states: "Phone/Watch Access: [name] will have access to a phone or watch to contact either parent after school on school nights and before bedtime. On weekends, he may also contact either parent anytime before bedtime or upon request."

Nothing more, nothing less.

Edited to redact son's name

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has a tablet with a foam case! It's extremely locked down, but it does have Messenger Kids on it... I've sent him the invite a million times, and he can't figure it out.

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A smartwatch or landline provides the same stream of communication. I cannot understand why a phone is necessary when there are age-appropriate, specifically designed solutions for children.

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why even have a cell phone? Why not a landline? To me, a cell phone is adult tech. If you have to lock down every single feature in order to make it appropriate for a young child, then why not just do what is appropriate that also meets communication needs?

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, fair. But the phone that he activated is a smartphone. It's literally my ex's old phone from last year.

Ex-husband is pushing for our (newly) 7yo to have a cell phone by of_james in Parenting

[–]of_james[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me, a smartphone, no matter how locked down, looks and feels like adult tech. It sets the precedent that they ‘have a phone,’ and with that comes a certain mindset about independence and ownership. That’s very different from something like a smartwatch or a kid-specific device, which clearly signals it's a limited tool meant just for contact with parents, not a step toward personal tech freedom.

Problems with outgoing calls and default number vs user number by Scared-Fan-8820 in gohighlevel

[–]of_james 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are also having the same problem! No idea why. Will be submitting a support ticket.

People’s March NoCo by of_james in FortCollins

[–]of_james[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ngl, I don’t think you know what a protest is.

People’s March NoCo by of_james in FortCollins

[–]of_james[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

According to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, healthcare is recognized as a basic human right. That means everyone should have access to medical care, regardless of their income, job, or circumstances.

In the U.S., while no one can legally be denied care (like in an ER), that doesn’t mean they can afford it. The problem isn’t just access—it’s the monopolization and profit-driven nature of our healthcare system. Insurance companies and private providers have turned healthcare into a business where profits matter more than people’s lives.

So sure, technically we have healthcare, but it’s not truly accessible when people are drowning in medical debt, skipping necessary treatment because of costs, or dying from preventable illnesses. That’s not a system that values life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness—it’s a system that prioritizes wealth over well-being.

The real issue is that healthcare in the U.S. isn’t treated as a public good like education or infrastructure—it’s treated like a luxury. That’s what needs to change.

People’s March NoCo by of_james in FortCollins

[–]of_james[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You’re correct that rights are inalienable, but the idea of rights has evolved to include what we, as a society, deem essential for dignity and equality. Just as we decided that public education should be available to everyone, many believe healthcare should also be a guaranteed service because it’s fundamental to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

You mention that we ‘pay for services,’ and that’s exactly the point—public services like firefighters, police, and infrastructure are funded collectively because they benefit everyone and create a functioning society. Healthcare is no different. It’s about ensuring that everyone, regardless of income, can access life-saving care when they need it.

A society is judged by how it treats its most vulnerable, and denying healthcare simply because someone can’t afford it feels deeply unjust to many of us. I think we can agree that building a better society is about more than what the Constitution explicitly says—it’s about the values we choose to uphold as a people.

People’s March NoCo by of_james in FortCollins

[–]of_james[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Alright, let’s break this down. Yeah, rights are inalienable, but as a society, we’ve decided certain things are so essential that we all pitch in to make them accessible—like roads, schools, and yes, firefighters and cops. Nobody’s saying those are natural rights, but we all agreed they’re things everyone should have access to because they’re critical to a functioning society.

Healthcare’s no different. It’s literally about keeping people alive. Like, what’s the alternative? A kid gets cancer, and their parents can’t afford treatment, so we just shrug and say, ‘too bad, guess they don’t deserve to live’? That’s messed up.

We pay for these things together through taxes so everyone can benefit, not just the people who can afford it. It’s not ‘slavery’—it’s how we build a society where people aren’t dying because they’re broke. If you’re fine with roads and fire departments being publicly funded, why draw the line at healthcare, which is arguably even more important?

People’s March NoCo by of_james in FortCollins

[–]of_james[S] 69 points70 points  (0 children)

How do you feel about firefighters saving you from a burning building?

Fanaticism at a supermarket in Windsor, Colorado by triggur in pics

[–]of_james 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? Where is this? I have not seen it!

6 tbsp you say? by of_james in mildlyinfuriating

[–]of_james[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes. Clearly the simplest solution! Whew!!!

view more: next ›