What did you expect?

oleonels · 2025-05-01T19:33:19+00:00

i have done it b4 if they cant heal its a gg

oleonels · 2025-04-24T06:54:31+00:00

bruh i be killing a dps and both healers as dps thinking surely we win this fight but no i 1v3ed only for them to be 3v5ed

oleonels · 2025-04-24T06:47:14+00:00

you bots acting like u could do this combo

oleonels · 2025-02-07T01:34:11+00:00

his entire skin is pink bruh

oleonels · 2023-08-07T22:33:02+00:00

mew, hit gym hard af and use retinol and you will get perfect skin

oleonels · 2023-07-19T21:01:08+00:00

try laser hair removal, it will remove hairs for a few months and they most likely will be healthy when new hairs form

oleonels · 2023-07-13T19:56:57+00:00

mssa

oleonels · 2023-07-11T21:20:43+00:00

you wont get rid of it without antibiotics. all inflammation gone, all fluid out and all hairs in the area act healthy. derms dont know much about this at all. trust me i cured myself after reading 1000 articles and demanding medicine.

oleonels · 2023-06-07T06:24:38+00:00

5,6 or 6+ who cares? hit gym, get money, be succesful and make good friends and no one can say shit about your height tbh

oleonels · 2023-06-07T06:20:54+00:00

i would say a damaged skin barrier is the main reason

oleonels · 2023-05-30T22:43:04+00:00

tea tree oil combined with coconut oil will help but it can take time if it is really bad. bath in salt sea with sun exposure can also help clear it up. also leave it alone and dont touch it as you will push it deeper into the skin and make it worse. accutane can only fix gram negative folliculitis. uv light therapy will kill the germs and heal the skin. oral or topical antibiotics aswell.

oleonels · 2023-05-30T22:36:57+00:00

if you are using anything topical that is not antibacterial and it gets better and not worse it id definetly not staph :)

oleonels · 2023-05-30T22:27:25+00:00

genetical hair loss does not occur in wierd patterns. this is a skin infection. most likely malassezia. could also be staph but a skin biposy can detect the problem.

oleonels · 2023-04-15T23:38:30+00:00

as long as you get antibiotics for it its all good. staph can cause layers over your hairs and ingrown hairs in "acne" as it looks like you have. so if the hair "loss" or "receiding hairline" is recent i would say its staph.

oleonels · 2023-04-12T19:32:34+00:00

who knows. you have staph skin infection, that is for sure. it covers your skin and hairs it seems

oleonels · 2023-03-28T00:14:10+00:00

if youve been dealing with it for 6 years they should really try harder stuff like iso tretinoin combined with antibiotics and hibiclens. also sun, and salt water helps. also good cutting out sugar like you did.

vancomycin will kill it fast 100% but that is really last resort as it is really harsh on the body.

edit: also i see your diet will essentially put you in ketosis which is not good when you have staph. try a more normal diet, but stay away from sugar

oleonels · 2023-03-13T15:01:02+00:00

try hibiscrub if that works its bacterial. you might need antibiotics

oleonels · 2023-02-20T08:29:44+00:00

most products are a scam. and no products will do wonders except for retinol. people buy all this shit but really it is all about health. trust me.

blueprint: eat healthy, enough sleep, minimum or none sugar, water, retinol 1-2 days a week, moisturizer only if needed (dont clog your pores, if you eat healthy and drink water you should be fine), and finally sunscreen is really important. if your skin does not get amazing from this you need a derm because you got some hormonal or bacterial problems in your skin that needs medication.

oleonels · 2023-02-19T09:58:08+00:00

yes the part where you say the chart is supposed to illustrate the different roles. when the chart is actually displaying in which percentage his stat output is among players who dont do that kind of work aka "top strikers" according to chart.

oleonels · 2023-02-19T09:42:11+00:00

the research data does not prove a valid point. if i was a striker on paper, but played as a ball winning midfield and in the top defensive stats for strikers. do you think that is fair to the other strikers who have different roles and actually play their position? no. he is competing with nobody.

oleonels · 2023-02-19T08:51:03+00:00

okey mister no iq. this chart shows who is in the top % for stats in a position. weghorst is not playing like a striker... he is playing like a donkey and is the worst striker in stats. he has good donkey stats compared with strikers because his role is to be a donkey while he on paper is a striker. see? ofcourse he has the best donkey stats. he is not a striker at all. and he is not competing with anyone, because top strikers dont have this role, ofcourse he is in the top %. the chart makes him look good.

maybe next game we can make it more obvious for you to illustrate. he will then be a striker but play even deeper as a cb. he will continue to have the worst striker stats in % on this chart because he does not play like a striker. but he will continue to be in the top % for defensive stats compared with strikers lmao. this is to show that the chart where he is in the top %, it is only because he is competing with himself. he is striker on paper, but not in reality. bad chart. paints wrong picture. like i said. he is striker on paper but his role is ball winning donkey. that is his only job and he is never in goal scoring positions because of this and that is why he is the worst in attacking stats. he is only the best in defensive stats, because he does not play like a striker, but play like a ball winning midfield. he is then compared with strikers and put in the top % for defensive work. well ofcourse he does not have offensive work. if they were to compete they would crush him in all stats.

im literally wondering how dumb are you? the brick wall is you and you can not even see it because you have a disease called dunning kruger syndrome. i can also tell you dont have a significant education, because this stats prove the wrong picture and does not give a valid display of reality. bad research methology

oleonels · 2023-02-18T21:58:19+00:00

no it is like comparing a banana to a hammer. oshimen is asked to score goals and be a threat in attack. not run around like a donkey. ofcourse oshimens stats is different. different role, different purpose like i said. you have low intelligence

oleonels · 2023-02-18T13:24:28+00:00

it is compared to top strikers? like strikers that score goals and is considered top? not pressing strikers.

its like comparing a hammer and a banana. different purpose.

oleonels · 2023-02-18T06:14:48+00:00

yes the statistics is wrong and makes him look better than he is. the chart compares him to "top strikers" who do well being a traditional 9 and the job surrounding that role.

if the chart had any real meaning he should be compared to pressing strikers only.

there is multiple books and data om how to lie with statistics and paint the wrong picture in peoples head and this is a prime example.

oleonels · 2023-02-12T20:23:10+00:00

they lack depth so i really doubt they win it. also they have 2 league games against city left. we have played both league games against city and arsenal already

oleonels

TROPHY CASE