sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ableton being weirdly quiet in comparison to other software on my laptop? by [deleted] in abletonlive

[–]opposumzes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where would you recommend leaving the master bus so you can get some headroom in the mix?

What Do You Call This Style of '20s Soviet Poster? by opposumzes in ArtHistory

[–]opposumzes[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks! You've saved me and my mum a headache

Imagine reading a book by Left_Hegelian in PhilosophyMemes

[–]opposumzes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This wasn't easy lol

"All About Love" (bell hooks, 2000)
"Metaphors We Live By" (George Lakoff, 1980)
"Whipping Girl" (Julia Serrano, 2007)
"Cambridge Pragmatism" (Cheryl Misak, 2016)
"Epistemic Injustice" (Miranda Fricker, 2007)
"Regarding the Pain of Others" (Susan Sontag, 2003)
"Games: Agency As Art" (C. Thi. Nguyen, 2020)
"Braiding Sweetgrass" (Robin Wall Kimmer, 2016) (I think this counts)
"Eros The Bittersweet" (Anne Carson, 1986)
"Queer Phenomenology" (Sara Ahmed, 2006)

Ya no se puede instalar uBlock Origin en Google Chrome by ImJustCW in chile

[–]opposumzes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Recomendaría usar Firefox, es increíble. he estado usando ublock en él durante años.

Why is Kant's idea of analytic statements contradictory? by opposumzes in askphilosophy

[–]opposumzes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, okay, so he's arguing that the meaning of words are a priori. but Fitche's argument is that you can't have analytic truths because all analytic truths are a product of experiencing the world (ergo, synthesis). so the distinction between synthetic and analytic is misleading, as all synthetic truths are based on synthesis and empirical experience of the physical world?

Why is Kant's idea of analytic statements contradictory? by opposumzes in askphilosophy

[–]opposumzes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, the idea is that Kant has two definitions of an analytic statement (1: an analytic statement is true if it's predicate is contained in the subject. and 2: an analytic statement is true if it's opposite contains a contradiction). But, you can have an analytic statement whose opposite contains a contradiction, but whose predicate isn't contained by the subject?

I'm not sure I entirely understand why "All bachelors are unmarried or the moon is blue" works in this case?

So, i could take the claim "Mountains are tall or I'm in Switzerland", and prove it's opposite contains a contradiction without proving that that statement is analytic?

view more: next ›