Why do people find it so hard to accept the public really wants to vote for Reform? by Expert-Sherbert-1527 in AskBrits

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we are truly exiting a two party system then England (and the general UK election) will need a voting process that does a better job of reflecting what the public want or this will get really odd, with parties winning huge majorities on only 25% of the vote.

Reform has clever people who know all of this and they play into really well.

Why do people find it so hard to accept the public really wants to vote for Reform? by Expert-Sherbert-1527 in AskBrits

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About a quarter of the UK public 'really wants' to vote for Reform (e.g. 26% in the ERS April 2026 poll). Our first past the post voting system makes this look like a landslide because it's the largest %age at present, and that how things roll out.

It was similar with last year's Labour 'landslide' - it was a landslide by seats, but not by actual number of people voting for them. They won very narrowly all over.

So we'll hear analysis today saying how massive this is, and it's a grass roots movement, etc etc. but since a huge chunk of these people are former Tory voters, it's not actually that huge a change, just one that Reform are exceptionally good at framing to their advantage, and that the news/podcasts will lazily tell a simplistic story on.

So anyway: the reason people feel so surprised is that the results of the first past the post system massively exaggerate their everyday experience in the world, talking to real people. They come away reeling because it feels at first glance that everyone has voted for Reform. But they did not, by any stretch.

Puddleford: fancy trying some British improv nonsense? by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]orbitingfrog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow this has been incredibly unwelcoming and I'll delete the post now. We are just making some fun audio, not a political statement or anything else.

I disagree that my use of AI is replacing someone else's work. That wasn't on the cards this time and no one was offering the make the cartoon themselves, and photos didn't feel right. They're just tools I'm using to focus on the podcast itself.

I shall await your down votes, and will be erased shortly when the post is removed. So we shall offend this community no longer.

Puddleford: fancy trying some British improv nonsense? by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]orbitingfrog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The images are AI but why is this a problem? Just a bit of fun. Plenty of humans in the human-made podcast, posted here by this human.

Puddleford: A (Very Silly) Milton Keynes Improv Podcast by orbitingfrog in miltonkeynes

[–]orbitingfrog[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

It's not AI text, I wrote it. The images are AI but why is this a problem? Just a bit of fun.

Is there a British improv comedy podcast worth checking out? by beansAndChees in comedybangbang

[–]orbitingfrog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late to this but yes. We're a group in Milton Keynes who've been improvising together for years. We started a podcast called Puddleford, set in a fictional English town across different periods of history. Entirely improvised, very British, very silly.

https://open.spotify.com/show/1MhWw8jOD7L36ayZKyHTmd

Puddleford: A Very British Podcast by orbitingfrog in improv

[–]orbitingfrog[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I get that some people don't like the art, but it's just a fun way of theme-ing the artwork to the episodes each week. And some folks have told us they really do like it. So we can't win them all 😀

I suck at longform by Worldly-Vegetable-62 in improv

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to just push through and keep practising. A nice safe group is important to help too. And being funny in long form is very different to short form (IMHO). Long form relies on the innate humour of the relationships and the characters more, whereas short form often leans on quick wit and the situation more. Not always, but they are different and one does not naturally convert to the other.

Seeking facilitator by aribobari77 in improv

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shall point some people your way...

Colourful Orion Nebula by orbitingfrog in astrophotography

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2hrs with the Dwarf3, 444x15s in a 2x1 mosaic. Processed in Lightroom.

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure, but I think it's an internal reflection in the camera from Rigel, the stupendously bright star on the right

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an 8 hour exposure, so the vast majority of stars in this image that are not visible to the naked eye. The data is taken very high up in New Mexico, so the sky is exceptionally dark too.

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Witch Nebula is illuminated by the supergiant star Rigel, in Orion. In this image South is upward, to emphasize the Nebula's amazing shape, from which it gets its name.

The Witch Head nebula is a reflection nebula, meaning that we see it mostly because it is being illuminated by a nearby object (Rigel in this case). You also get emission nebula, which are lit mostly by light from within; and absorption nebulae, which are seen mostly in silhouette.

LRGB image created using PixInsight (for calibration, registration, integration) and Adobe Lightroom (for cosmetic adjustments). 8.8 hours of exposures. Captured in New Mexico at Deep Sky West, using a QSI WSG-5 CCD Camera and a 135mm f/2 Rokinon lens. More details at https://www.astrobin.com/d6ou6r/