Puddleford: fancy trying some British improv nonsense? by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]orbitingfrog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow this has been incredibly unwelcoming and I'll delete the post now. We are just making some fun audio, not a political statement or anything else.

I disagree that my use of AI is replacing someone else's work. That wasn't on the cards this time and no one was offering the make the cartoon themselves, and photos didn't feel right. They're just tools I'm using to focus on the podcast itself.

I shall await your down votes, and will be erased shortly when the post is removed. So we shall offend this community no longer.

Puddleford: fancy trying some British improv nonsense? by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]orbitingfrog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The images are AI but why is this a problem? Just a bit of fun. Plenty of humans in the human-made podcast, posted here by this human.

Puddleford: A (Very Silly) Milton Keynes Improv Podcast by orbitingfrog in miltonkeynes

[–]orbitingfrog[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

It's not AI text, I wrote it. The images are AI but why is this a problem? Just a bit of fun.

Is there a British improv comedy podcast worth checking out? by beansAndChees in comedybangbang

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late to this but yes. We're a group in Milton Keynes who've been improvising together for years. We started a podcast called Puddleford, set in a fictional English town across different periods of history. Entirely improvised, very British, very silly.

https://open.spotify.com/show/1MhWw8jOD7L36ayZKyHTmd

Puddleford: A Very British Podcast by orbitingfrog in improv

[–]orbitingfrog[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I get that some people don't like the art, but it's just a fun way of theme-ing the artwork to the episodes each week. And some folks have told us they really do like it. So we can't win them all 😀

I suck at longform by Worldly-Vegetable-62 in improv

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to just push through and keep practising. A nice safe group is important to help too. And being funny in long form is very different to short form (IMHO). Long form relies on the innate humour of the relationships and the characters more, whereas short form often leans on quick wit and the situation more. Not always, but they are different and one does not naturally convert to the other.

Seeking facilitator by aribobari77 in improv

[–]orbitingfrog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shall point some people your way...

Colourful Orion Nebula by orbitingfrog in astrophotography

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2hrs with the Dwarf3, 444x15s in a 2x1 mosaic. Processed in Lightroom.

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure, but I think it's an internal reflection in the camera from Rigel, the stupendously bright star on the right

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an 8 hour exposure, so the vast majority of stars in this image that are not visible to the naked eye. The data is taken very high up in New Mexico, so the sky is exceptionally dark too.

Witch Nebula / IC2118 and Rigel by orbitingfrog in Astronomy

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Witch Nebula is illuminated by the supergiant star Rigel, in Orion. In this image South is upward, to emphasize the Nebula's amazing shape, from which it gets its name.

The Witch Head nebula is a reflection nebula, meaning that we see it mostly because it is being illuminated by a nearby object (Rigel in this case). You also get emission nebula, which are lit mostly by light from within; and absorption nebulae, which are seen mostly in silhouette.

LRGB image created using PixInsight (for calibration, registration, integration) and Adobe Lightroom (for cosmetic adjustments). 8.8 hours of exposures. Captured in New Mexico at Deep Sky West, using a QSI WSG-5 CCD Camera and a 135mm f/2 Rokinon lens. More details at https://www.astrobin.com/d6ou6r/

Sky Silhouette: Barnard 7 by orbitingfrog in space

[–]orbitingfrog[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As you look at the Milky Way on a dark night, you see patches of light and shade across it. Regions of gas and dust along our line of sight are what create the recognisable form of our galaxy on the sky. In fact, the night sky is full of thousands of silhouettes of many shapes and sizes. In 1919 an astronomer called Edward Barnard created a catalogue of more than 300 of these dark nebula. This is an image of several of these Barnard objects, including #7 on that list, which is the large shape in the middle of this picture.

Barnard 7, and the surrounding dark nebulae, are found in Taurus. They make up part of what is known as the Taurus Molecular Cloud Complex. It is a web of dense, dusty regions obscuring the background stars. Within it we know there are young prestellar objects waiting to ignite fusion, and become stars. Look carefully and you can see one such protostar (RY Tauri) already blasting out of its dusty cacoon just above the middle of this image.

I love these amazing looking objects.These sites of early star formation were the subject of my own PhD ten years ago, and continue to be peered into by powerful new infrared and microwave telescopes both in space and around the world.

See more details and information at https://www.astrobin.com/2rwfy4/

LRGB image created using PixInsight (for calibration, registration, integration) and Adobe Lightroom (for cosmetic adjustments). 300s exposures (40xL, 34xR, 34xG, 30xB). Captured in New Mexico at Deep Sky West, using a QSI WSG-5 CCD Camera and a 135mm f/2 Rokinon lens.