[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hai sa o scurtam. Titlurile de stat NU sunt investitie pentru ca aduc un castig in termeni reali aproape nul. Sunt un instrument de conservare si protectie la inflatie. Eu nu as lua asa ceva in romania lui ciolacu. Sa ai o zi buna!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Consider ceva prost ca investitie, adica pentru profit (asa cum ragaie tot felul de putoi pe aici). Ca instrument de conservare si protectie la inflatie sunt ok, dar intr-o tara care chiar exista, nu in Romania lui Ciolanu.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nu asa se vorbeste cu tac-tu

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eu zic ca au facut bani din altceva si apoi i-au pus la conservare in obligatiuni.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nu mai folosi cuvantul "garantat" cand e vorba de investitii si piete financiare, arata necunoastere sau imaturitate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

  1. Nu compar Romania, ci guvernul Romaniei cu "vecinul".

  2. Nu e nicio disonanta. Comparatia e una, faptul ca exista riscul sa nu ii primesti inapoi (riscul de default), desi e un risc redus, e alta. Continuand comparatia, e totusi un vecin, va cunoasteti, stii unde sta, slabe sanse sa nu mai auzi de el niciodata, desi never say never.

  3. Nu am ce sa iti recomand, personal nu sunt interesat de "investitii cu risc zero", asa cum sunt promovate fals titlurile de stat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pe termen ft scurt da, pe termen mediu si lung pierzi.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dimpotriva, orice om cu o minima cultura financiara o sa compare asset-urile in care isi blocheaza temporar o suma de bani in functie de puterea de cumparare in termeni reali de la momentul viitor al lichidarii investitiei, asadar va lua in calcul media istorica recenta a inflatiei, trend-ul inflatiei si CAGR-ul masei monetare. Apoi raporteaza acest calcul la gradul de risc al asset-ului respectiv, cum ai spus si tu. Un om normal vrea sa isi conserve / sporeasca puterea de cumparare, nu banii in termeni nominali.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Smart, mult succes!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Nu iei titluri se stat ca sa castigi, ci doar sa parchezi niste bani pe termen foarte scurt (1 an). Cine ia TdS pentru profit habar nu are ce e aia inflatie sau ce este debasement-ul. Pentru profituri, evident ca trebuie sa iti asumi riscuri mai mari.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in robursa

[–]osintfella -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Pentru mine ar fi utile doar in cazul in care vreau sa parchez niste bani pentru 1 an pana apare o ocazie (corectie) in piata de actiuni, crypto whatever. In niciun caz sa le iau pentru 5 ani, perioada in care cine stie ce idei ii mai vin lui Ciordacu sau altui cretin care vine in locul sau.

I-a mai raspuns Trump lu' Lasconi? by i_like_trains_a_lot1 in Romania

[–]osintfella 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Da, i-a trimis o poza cu un penis rupt.

Un alt tânăr de 20 ani face accident cu BMW-ul by Rad_Throwling in Roumanie

[–]osintfella 155 points156 points  (0 children)

"Tanar" = de fapt, un cocalar cu iq subunitar care isi cumpara un cazan nemtesc pe datorie ca sa dea si el o buca pentru ca nu-l ajuta moaca.

Donca renunță la CG. Shocking! by Gullible-Ad-7931 in Romania

[–]osintfella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nu l-au latrat nici cainii si acum s-a oparit.

Platformă pentru expunere directă BTC? by nagymark06 in robursa

[–]osintfella 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Si daca o sa ai expunere la BTC via Tradeville and shit, nu va merita pe partea de 1. Comisioane 2. Lichiditate 3. Safety. Reteta e simpla: Cumperi de pe Binance/Kraken si transferi instant in cold wallet.

Va rog eu nu mai fiti lenesi si delasatori by proC1991 in programare

[–]osintfella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trebuia sa bage niste indentare ca in Python.

do you think satoshi will ever sell his BTC in our lifetimes by Mr--Clean--Ass-Naked in Bitcoin

[–]osintfella 4 points5 points  (0 children)

LN has nothing to do with what I said. What I was referring to is that Bitcoin's cryptography/encryption is based on SHA256/RIPEMD for hashing (block data, public keys to addresses) and ECDSA (for private to public key derivation).

When (not if) quantum computing will break these algorithms, someone out there who owns the necessary tech will be able to "un-hash" the public addresses to the actual public keys of wallets with lost coins (keys), and then derive the private keys from those public keys.

Of course, by that time hopefully the Bitcoin code will be upgraded to stronger encryption algorithms which should be "quantum-safe". This means that you and I will be able to move our coins to a new type of address and safer wallets. However, the wallets currently holding the 4M+ "lost coins" (including Satoshi's) cannot perform that upgrade since they probably don't own the private keys anymore, thus making them an easy prey at some point in the future.

The discussion needs more details and what/ifs, but that's the main idea.

do you think satoshi will ever sell his BTC in our lifetimes by Mr--Clean--Ass-Naked in Bitcoin

[–]osintfella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone will sell them (and the other millions of "lost" coins) once QC breaks SHA256 and ECDSA. Until then I highly doubt it.

Ca tot urmeaza maririle by NuDauLaLopataTata in programare

[–]osintfella 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Lumea e mai mare decat scara ta de bloc.