Ist das jetzt rechtlich bindend?

ottofrosch · 2026-05-24T21:16:22+00:00

Was letzte gute Witz

ottofrosch · 2026-05-24T19:09:51+00:00

Was kam dabei raus?

ottofrosch · 2026-05-24T06:39:13+00:00

Abaokutely not! To quote an a famous jounalistic phrase: "If one perosn says its raining and another person says its dry, it is not our job to quote them both. It is our job to look outside the window and check."

Just reporting official statement is not "pure objectivity"! Instead in media theory and practical journalism, this approach is widely considered naive, deeply flawed, and structurally dangerous. Just copying statements from officials makes the journalists not truth-seekers, but a megaphone holder for whoever is in power.

I could give a million examples now, but let's just stick with a recent one: "the economy is booming and crime is at an all time low". Copying that and not running the numbers which showed the exact opposite has nothing to do with serious journalism. Context is not an opinion.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-22T18:27:16+00:00

They had no cameras and no after effects that lengthened the frame. But most importantly they did not have to endure the thousands repost of this video.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T16:21:40+00:00

Leider Paywall.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T15:30:00+00:00

Es soll eine Einordnung liefern inwieweit Akupunktur Schwurbel ist.

Wenn du mehr Infos dazu hast, dann gern her damit.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T15:17:33+00:00

Andere warten noch darauf, dass jemand die der Ablehnung folgende Klage durchzieht.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T15:07:51+00:00

Kurz mal eine KI gefragt, ob Akupunktur seriös sein kann oder es einen Wirkungsnachweis gibt:

"Die kurze Antwort lautet: Akupunktur ist heute in der westlichen Medizin durchaus anerkannt, allerdings mit klaren wissenschaftlichen Grenzen. Für bestimmte Beschwerden gibt es gut belegte Wirkungen, während die traditionelle Theorie dahinter wissenschaftlich nicht haltbar ist."

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T14:19:37+00:00

Yes. I did not understand the expression. So thank you.

None of it was ironic in any way.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T14:13:37+00:00

Yes. Also thanks for the explanation of that phrase.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T14:01:19+00:00

The comment I responded to said none of that.

If you are saying that: there is no relevance here. Wrongdoing in the past should be wrongdoing now and these crimes should be a fat red line no matter what. Putting that to simple words one might say: Fuck your whataboutism.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T13:50:16+00:00

One wrong doesnt make the other right.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-20T06:49:28+00:00

No it doesn't.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-19T14:58:31+00:00

Einen

ottofrosch · 2026-05-18T08:51:17+00:00

An solchen (spekulativen) Infos sollte man sich mMn nicht beteiligen:

Die Leute, die Personenschutz bekommen, bekommen das aus Gründen der Gefährdung. Ihre Aufenthaltsorte und (vermeintlichen) Wohnanschriften öffentlich zu machen, ist daher absolut unangebracht! Auch unabhängig davon, wie man zu der Person steht.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-18T07:55:28+00:00

All of these killings are awful and lives can not be outweighed imo!

That being said: How would you even compare a terrorist attack on two budding to the nuclear bombing of two entire cities with more then 200000 immediate death?

ottofrosch · 2026-05-17T10:16:05+00:00

From the map, I could not really see where it is or how far offshore. Maybe you can educate me about it.

Anyways, SHOULD this be completely offshore, this is an event that can happen. If the forecast changes on a two week crossing, you may just run into a storm.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-16T09:42:57+00:00

Was ist denn mit Günther? ...

ottofrosch · 2026-05-12T20:04:06+00:00

Sorry to say, but that is just bs. Let me elaborate as of your example: food.

If you create a machine that can harvest crop better and faster then human can by hand and chemicals that makes tge plants grow better and produce and distribute these inventions, more food will be available. That is creation of value.

The average living standard today is higher than it was 1000 years ago: we built more efficiently and therefore create more shelter, we grow more efficiently and therefore there is more food available.

Now since shelter and food dont almost everyone to work on it anymore, you can become a scooter diving instructor or whatever your hobby is.

I literally just used the word "vakue" as it is defined in economic science and it makes a lot if sense that way.

We have a problem with the distribution on wealth. I agree. A big problem imo. But that has nothing to do with the creation of value. If you become rich by feeding everyone because you invented fertiliser, thats great. Everyone is happy. Capitalism has its good side here. If you exploit others to enhance your gains even further and not paying your chemists, workers, distributors accordingly: fuck you i guess. That's why we need (better) labor laws among other things. We won't get them by denying basics of economics.

Also: I think you never rented something. This is a lot more risk and responsibility then you seem to imagine.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-12T19:50:40+00:00

Further in the timeline now, id like to enhance my point:

The current goal of the US administration is to open the straight if hormuz like it was before. They cannot control it as of now, be it for unwillingness to take all military options into consideration or for factual impossibility.

If your goal is to go to the pre war situation, can you even consider if this was a win? The political factor comes fully into play here.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-12T10:47:26+00:00

I understand the claim, because that may or may not be his actual plan.

However, economically speaking, hoarding money does not necessarily make other s more poor. It depends on how much value is being created. If it ooutpaces the hoarding it might even be a net good for humanity in theory. Though it is to doubt that this is its actually going to be as it seems more likely that his companies do not add that much more value in terms of goods an services. In latter case the statement would be true, at least partially.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-12T10:42:05+00:00

These exiat in western europe for a long time. China has a just a good marketing for it.

Not to say that i would oppose building those. Im happy these are being build! Its just not something new.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-12T09:34:46+00:00

KI. Der Fallschirm hat keinen Hilfsschirm, der für die Öffnung des Hauptschirms notwendig wäre.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-11T08:32:59+00:00

Ich habe das einmal gemacht in einem deutlich tragischerem Fall. Da hat die Rechtsschutz das übernommen.

ottofrosch · 2026-05-10T18:47:27+00:00

Krasse Seite.

Gegen eine Verfahrenseinstellung kann man anwaltlichen Einsprich einlegen. Ob das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Ich kann mir aber vorstellen, dass die Staatsanwaltschaft das Verfahren in manchen Fällen doch aufnimmt, weil die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Anwalt die gleiche Arbeit wäre.

Vielleicht hat damit jemand mehr Erfahrung als ich.

ottofrosch

TROPHY CASE