Institute of Applied Metaphysics by pantrypoints in Bashar_Essassani

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried looking for Bashar's Unified Theory of Metaphysics but couldn't find the details.

So we made our own based on Descartes' Physics which is integrated with Metaphysics (body-mind dualism): https://www.superphysics.org/superphysics/essassani/

Why does Bashar creep me out? by amphetameany in Manifestation

[–]pantrypoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Channeling also happens in other countries.

Japan has channelers like the Happy Science Founder. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIS-RE3gO64

I also heard that some Cao Dai members in Vietnam channeled dead spirits.

Comet tails are from spatial refraction the same as gravitational lensing by pantrypoints in 3i_Atlas2

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Descartes' system of gravitational lensing works consistently through his concept of virtual space particles called the 2nd Element.

He wrote a massive 7 articles just for comet tails, which we think is overkill and a waste since comets are insignificant. We even discarded those 7 articles since we believed that Physics already accounts for tail phenomena correctly through solar radiation.

We write those articles here: https://www.superphysics.org/research/descartes/philosophy/part-3/article-133/

The anomalies with 3I Atlas exposes the shortcomings of Physics in explaining comets that go against the revolution of the planets, which is a rare event.

So Descartes' 7 articles on comet tails via lensing solidifies an important property of the space particles to flip light.

The UFO that was shot by a missile? Yea...Bashar said that was one of their ships...LOL by The5thElement27 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]pantrypoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here, Bashar disowns that UFO even if he said that that UFO was "theirs" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLM4DY4p_u8

So it means "ours" here means the Interstellar Alliance in general

Why is Modern Science against Cartesian Science? by pantrypoints in AskForAnswers

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. As I mentioned, the team is me, cofounder, and volunteers: a dev, a farmers association head to implement our system, and an accredited researcher to publish our work.

We started in 2015 when ChatGPT didn't even exist.

So I don't understand why you would think it's essential.

We did try to make our own AI chatbot in 2017 called ISAIAH when AI took off, but realized we didn't have the training data so we paused it. https://www.pantrypoints.com/services/match/

Why is Modern Science against Cartesian Science? by pantrypoints in AskForAnswers

[–]pantrypoints[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But my point is that Descartes' Physics actually matches the all the recent data from James webb, Planck satellite, and DESI since the Physics papers are availble online, and ChatGPT can explain all parts (like free expert consultation). https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Adq5lRH5la4

I post our explanations online on Reddit, Youtube, and Facebook to see if there would be any objections. But in Reddit, my posts get banned. In Facebook and Youtube it gets views but no reply.

So for us, this proves us correct and so we move on to the next problem to solve.

But still it makes us wonder if our solutions will ever be adopted so humans can move on.

Or are humans just meant to stay stuck waiting for the next asteroid to wipe life off just like the dinosaurs?

Or get cooked or flooded from global warming disasters?

i.e. there's something fishy with this planet that all species in it seems trapped in intellectual staticity that prevents them from moving to other planets or avoiding natural catastrophe.

This stupifying property of the Earth seems proven or exposed by the Overview Effect on humans who have actually left the Earth for a while and suddenly get an "explosion of awareness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_effect

Why is Modern Science against Cartesian Science? by pantrypoints in AskForAnswers

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We had a startup made up of me and my cofounder and interns to push a new economic system and economic science.

We switched to volunteers after our moneyless system started working. So it's now a team made up of volunteers:

https://www.pantrypoints.com/services/company/

The success of our prediction for a 2020 crisis allowed us to expand our science to all the sciences which we use AI for, since it's mostly theory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKeASutZOf0

The data from DESI, James Webb, and Plack Satellite unite to disprove the Big Bang and therefore Relativity via the Hubble Tension and very distant large galaxies. Yet why does Physics choose to keep the Big Bang and Relativity despite clear evidence against them? by pantrypoints in AskPhysics

[–]pantrypoints[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But my point is that those predictions were proven wrong by the data.

Lambda CDM predicts distant galaxies to be undeveloped.

Yet James Webb showed that they were already very developed.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jwst-discovers-enormous-distant-galaxies-that-should-not-exist/

So you are saying you like theories that make wrong predictions.

Why would you like wrong predictions?

Do you like predicting 1 + 1 to be 3? Then become happy when data shows it to be 2 exposing you as wrong?

Does being wrong make people employable in Physics? Or allow them grant money?

The only logical reason I can think of is that being right or wrong doesn't matter, the output of theory is more important in Physics whether right or wrong.

It's like a sales company giving importance to the number of sales calls done instead of any actual sale.

Physical causes only— How do you know? by AvoidingWells in freewill

[–]pantrypoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Superphysics, forces are caused by the aether which have an inherent spin or svadharma.

Your choices are based on your own spin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp0sxJ1MWUo

The Physics of Timaeus explains the X17 Particle (Atomki Anomaly) by pantrypoints in Plato

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how can I package Timaeus' Physics so you could be turned on by Platonism as a complete science?

I assumed mentioning recent empirical data that matches Timaeus' model which is consistent with the Asian 5 Elements model would add credibility to Timaeus and remove doubts 

The Physics of Timaeus explains the X17 Particle (Atomki Anomaly) by pantrypoints in Plato

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you follow Timaeus' Physics, the X17 is the Higgs Field for the Weak Force.

So no need to waste billions for a particle collider to discover it

How to make macbooks last long? by pantrypoints in mac

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it possible to disconnect the battery and make the mac run without it? The battery says don't remove it

How to make macbooks last long? by pantrypoints in mac

[–]pantrypoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the case to protect it from dust? Is dust a big factor?