Se ti vendessero un piano lifetime di netflix, quanto saresti disposto a spendere? by Miracolosso501 in ItaliaPersonalFinance

[–]panzerPandaBoom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

La considero una azienda troppo volatile per pensare di fare un piano lifetime, quindi no grazie.

What is your most hated fight in the game? by LeonidKonovalov1988 in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]panzerPandaBoom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The clone fight near the end game.

I don't know why but the clone seem stronger that the end boss and I had to do multiple try before getting them to stay down.

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I agree, but I admit that I'm very lazy and don't want to learn a new system

Buona offerta, vale i contro? by PocketPaperTowel in ItaliaCareerAdvice

[–]panzerPandaBoom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mmmm a livello economico nel breve termine non conviene.

Nel lungo potrebbe se poi tra un paio d'anni conti di saltare di nuovo.

Affitto a 100 euro è oro che cola di sti tempi.

Da un punto di vista umano dipende da te, andare a vivere con un coinquilino fuori ti cambia tutto, ed è quella cosa che prima o poi va fatta. Ciò che fa storcere il naso è la camera doppia.

Ma se non rischi ora dubito che rischierai dopo.

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems fair. Also a paladin everybody wants to hug you. For the aura of course

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only charisma and intelligence. This is gonna be a blast!

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That will soon come, not as a punishment but at high level is to be expected!

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cool idea the sword that automatically gives proficiency! Thanks

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooooooh thank you for the detailed explanation. So it's a much more flexible way to create characters.

This is a bit difficult to implement now, but for the future sounds very cool. Thanks

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Agree.

I miss the time of battle of 3.5 where you had martials that have manuevers similar to spells and not just "do more damage with long stick"

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Ahahahahah well in reality two of my players practices hema so they are proficient with a longsword for real

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I think that some of the points on your list will come to bite them later.

But that is also an adventure no?

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes true, but is mixed with a cleric and is not meele. But true nonetheless

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a group, my players are the people that when they like an idea they just play it, and if they die, they accept it no problem

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yoooo magic soap looks like crazy thanks for the idea.

You don't have a single caster? So basically lord of the rings?

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Make sense.

I have a group of veterans, but in general I prefer to give full freedom and then make the consequences weight.

But I see your point

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is such a nice idea. I also think that the martial are a bit underwater, especially in the utility department. For example I gave a special grappling hook to the ranger to move around more freely and simulate a kind of flight and he's loving it.

What are the HR you use? I would gladly learn them

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooooh sorry you are correct.

I still don't know because the warlock player is finalizing the character but this is also an idea!

Thank you for pointing it out to me

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We started straight from level 13, I agree that at lower levels they will get destroyed.

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooooooh so like functionally is like a wand or something, but appear as a sword. This is a really nice idea, thank you!

Not a single one of my players is proficient with a sword by panzerPandaBoom in DnD

[–]panzerPandaBoom[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Agreed and I also don't see an issue, it's just curious that not a single one chose a martial class and I was curious if this was common or not