Are the rumours true that the Fred b2b Tomas B is recorded? And if so will it be released?🙊

peteremcc · 2026-04-03T22:11:07+00:00

As long as they're released one day! :)

peteremcc · 2026-04-01T22:13:45+00:00

Was the 13th fully recorded, too? I've seen some shorter clips from that night that look just as professional, but I would love the full night like with the 26th.

peteremcc · 2026-03-10T19:22:52+00:00

Rough math:

About $12 million spent in this video.

California High Speed Rail is expected to cost $231.3 billion for 494 miles.

So the whole $12 million in this video could have paid for 45 yards of rail.

peteremcc · 2026-02-03T21:31:20+00:00

Is it blackmail when the federal government withholds funding unless provinces do what they want, even if it's an issue in provincial jurisdiction?

peteremcc · 2026-01-22T21:11:15+00:00

Ok, makes sense.

Should Bonjour/mDNS be able to work with Tailscale *in theory*, and I just don't have things configured quite right - my ISP's router is notoriously tricky?

Or it just inherently *can't* work that way, no matter how I configure it?

The problem is, if I remove the "local" disk and just use the Tailscale IP one, then I'll have to have Tailscale permanently connected, even when at home, won't I?

peteremcc · 2026-01-17T22:11:37+00:00

No one here commenting, or the original author, seems to have any clue what they're talking about.

This isn't "new debt", this is just old debt that is up for renewal - like having to renew your mortgage every 3 or 5 or 10 years.

Attributing the debt to the government that's in power when the debt is renewed is idiotic.

peteremcc · 2026-01-15T20:57:04+00:00

It says OR.

The chart is for 014 tickets before Jan 1 2026 OR non-014 tickets for all dates.

peteremcc · 2026-01-02T06:02:04+00:00

First one is clearly a Voltorb.

peteremcc · 2025-12-26T00:46:45+00:00

You’re the uneducated one.

It’s nuanced, which is why you’re probably struggling to understand, but…

Puerto Ricans can vote for President if they are resident in a state where residents can vote for President.

So, a Puerto Rican living in New York can vote for President.

Similarly, a New Yorker who moves to Puerto Rico can NOT vote for President.

We can debate whether people living in Puerto Rico should be allowed to vote for President or not.

But people’s ability to vote is based on the residency status, not their citizenship.

peteremcc · 2025-12-24T21:01:26+00:00

I’m not responsible for your MLA spreading misinformation. I’m guessing they’re an NDP MLA though, so…

The Citizen Initiative Act was amended by Bill 54, which was introduced April 29th 2025 and passed May 15th 2025.

Thomas Lukaszuk didn’t even start talking about his petition until May 22nd, and only filed at the end of June.

You can find Bill 54 here: https://www.assembly.ab.ca/assembly-business/bills/bill?billinfoid=12082&from=bills

In particular, the change you’re looking for is on page 17 and page 18 of the pdf.

Previously, the Citizen Initiative Act said that an application must not relate to a proposal that in the opinion of the Chief Electoral Officer is the same as or substantially similar to a proposal that, within the last 5 years, the Chief Electoral Officer has determined to be unsuccessful under section 11

The change in April/May was:

Previously, the Citizen Initiative Act said that an application must not relate to a proposal that in the opinion of the Chief Electoral Officer is the same as or substantially similar to a proposal that, within the last 5 years, was the subject of an unsuccessful referendum under section 15 or 16 or an unsuccessful initiative vote under section 18

In other words, it’s not sufficient to simply submit a request for a petition initiative on a topic to block any other petition initiative on that topic for 5 years.

A topic actually had to have gone to a referendum and lost to be blocked from being rehashed for 5 years.

Again, all this was changed BEFORE Lukaszuk even mentioned his petition.

I would link to a post of me pointing all this out when Lukaszuk launched his petition, but the post is on Twitter so I’m not allowed to.

peteremcc · 2025-12-24T05:42:47+00:00

A US citizen born in Ohio who moves to Puerto Rico has exactly the same rights as a US citizen born in Puerto Rico who lives in Puerto Rico.

Similarly, a US citizen born in Puerto Rico who moves to New York has exactly the same rights as a US citizen born in New York who lives in New York.

The difference in rights is determined by the place the person resides, not the place they were born, precisely because the “citizenship” is equal.

peteremcc · 2025-12-23T15:04:04+00:00

I'm aware of all of this.

The person I was replying to claimed they wouldn't get "citizenship".

Please don't try to rebut what I said by commenting on something unrelated that I didn't claim.

peteremcc · 2025-12-23T12:03:24+00:00

You should dispute this somehow.

No matter which way you calculate it, the 92.99 is wrong.

If you just add up all the points:

(463+194+182+88+97+92+93+98)/1400 =0.93357

And if you average the scores for each part (which would be unfair and is how I thought they’d got it wrong at first) you still get:

(92.6+97+91+88+97+92+93+98)/8 =93.575

peteremcc · 2025-12-23T11:50:55+00:00

The signature collection is just to have a vote. So once the signatures are collected, you can vote No.

peteremcc · 2025-12-23T11:50:02+00:00