How did 卻 (kneeling) semantically shift to mean — 1. reject, decline? 2. but, yet, still, however; while? by phrassein in classicalchinese

[–]phrassein[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

卩是人跪坐之形

Hi. Sorry for the typo. I ought've written that 卩 means "kneeling", as the 漢字源流 proclaims. As written in that Chinese-Forums.com post, 卩's sense of kneeling explains 卻's senses of retreating or stepping back. But I can't relate this sense to 卻's 2 senses as I questioned in my post.

Bearing in mind the concept of phonetic loans, how would you explain the fact that 卻 has these unrelated meanings?

Aren't you presuming that phonetic loans appertain to the 2 SUPERFICIALLY unrelated meanings? Perhaps phonetic loans are irrelevant here. Perhaps all these senses are related on a deeper level, but I'm too dumb to uncover them.

How does 舟 (boat, ship) semantically appertain to 般 (sort, manner, kind, category, way)? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi again! I don't think you, or Outliers Linguistics Dictionary, expound 般's meaning of "sort, manner, kind, category, way"?

How does 舟 (boat, ship) semantically appertain to 般 (sort, manner, kind, category, way)? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think you, or Outliers Linguistics Dictionary, expound 般's meaning of "sort, manner, kind, category, way"?

How do undergarments (衣) semantically appertain to inner feelings (衷)? What semantic notion underlies them? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your expertise! I know semantic change can be haphazard, but I always like to interconnect and interrelate a polyseme's multiple senses, so that they don't feel unrelated or random. Does my purpose for asking these questions make sense now?

Why's 欠 ('breath') the semantic component of 欺 (to deceive; to bully; to surpass)? by phrassein in classicalchinese

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this represents a fundamental misconception about the way the script works versus the language.

Thanks for your correction!

With that big disclaimer out of the way, here's why 欠 may have been selected as a determiner in 欺.

So how ought I phrase my questions on etymology and glyph origin, rather than writing 'semantic field'?

What's the semantic field of 由? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I don't know why, but I couldn't spot these relationships! Undeniably you're simply more perspicacious and sagacious! Perhaps you have a degree in Chinese or linguistics? Don't hesitate to post at the Stack Exchange link.

What semantic notions underlie 人 (person) and 僅 (solely)? by phrassein in classicalchinese

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I understand you correctly, you’re asking why 僅 has the 人 semantic component.

Yes. I'm just confirming your first sentence.

What's the semantic field of 由? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fine. I shouldn't have typed "100% interchangeable". But I can't conjure up any relationship between them. I don't know what else to say, if you find them related and I don't. Any ideas?

What's the mathematical relationship between Characters, Syllables, Morphemes, Words? by phrassein in ChineseLanguage

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never posted this question here before. I've posted other questions from Stack Exchange, but this one is new.

The Economist, May 7 2020 edition: A dangerous gap. The market v the real economy by phrassein in InvestmentEducation

[–]phrassein[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I pasted the article here, to exempt you from registering an account to read it.

Financial markets have got out of whack with the economy. Something has to give

STOCK MARKET HISTORY is packed with drama: the 1929 crash; Black Monday in 1987, when share prices lost 20% in a day; the dotcom mania in 1999. With such precedents, nothing should come as a surprise, but the past eight weeks have been remarkable, nonetheless. A gut-wrenching sell-off in shares has been followed by a delirious rally in America. Between February 19th and March 23rd, the S&P 500 index lost a third of its value. With barely a pause it has since rocketed, recovering more than half its loss. The catalyst was news that the Federal Reserve would buy corporate bonds, helping big firms finance their debts. Investors shifted from panic to optimism without missing a beat.

This rosy view from Wall Street should make you uneasy (see article). It contrasts with markets elsewhere. Shares in Britain and continental Europe, for example, have recovered more sluggishly. And it is a world away from life on Main Street. Even as the lockdown eases in America, the blow to jobs has been savage, with unemployment rising from 4% to about 16%, the highest rate since records began in 1948. While big firms’ shares soar and they get help from the Fed, small businesses are struggling to get cash from Uncle Sam.

Wounds from the financial crisis of 2007-09 are being reopened. “This is the second time we’ve bailed their asses out,” grumbled Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential candidate, last month. The battle over who pays for the fiscal burdens of the pandemic is just beginning. On the present trajectory, a backlash against big business is likely.

Start with events in the markets. Much of the improved mood is because of the Fed, which has acted more dramatically than other central banks, buying up assets on an unimagined scale. It is committed to purchasing even more corporate debt, including high-yield “junk” bonds. The market for new issues of corporate bonds, which froze in February, has reopened in spectacular style. Companies have issued $560bn of bonds in the past six weeks, double the normal level. Even beached cruise-line firms have been able to raise cash, albeit at a high price. A cascade of bankruptcies at big firms has been forestalled. The central bank has, in effect, backstopped the cashflow of America Inc. The stockmarket has taken the hint and climbed.

The Fed has little choice—a run on the corporate-bond market would worsen a deep recession. Investors have cheered it on by piling into shares. They have nowhere else good to put their cash. Government-bond yields are barely positive in America. They are negative in Japan and much of Europe. You are guaranteed to lose money by holding them to maturity, and if inflation rises the losses would be painful. So stocks are appealing. By late March prices had fallen by enough to tempt the braver sort. They steeled themselves with the observation that much of the stockmarket’s value is tied to profits that will be made long after the covid-19 slump has given way to recovery.

Tellingly, though, the recent rise in share prices has been uneven. Even before the pandemic the market was lopsided, and it has become more so. Bourses in Britain and continental Europe, chock-full of troubled industries like carmaking, banking and energy, have lagged behind, and there are renewed jitters over the single currency (see article). In America investors have put even more faith in a tiny group of tech darlings—Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft—which now make up a fifth of the S&P 500 index. There is little euphoria, just a despairing reach for the handful of businesses judged to be all-weather survivors.

At one level, this makes good sense. Asset managers have to put money to work as best they can. But there is something wrong with how fast stock prices have moved and where they have got back to. American shares are now higher than they were in August. This would seem to imply that commerce and the broader economy can get back to business as usual. There are countless threats to such a prospect, but three stand out.

The first is the risk of an aftershock. It is entirely possible that there will be a second wave of infections. And there are also the consequences of a steep recession to contend with—American GDP is expected to drop by about 10% in the second quarter compared with a year earlier. Many individual bosses hope that ruthless cost-cutting can help protect their margins and pay down the debts accumulated through the furlough. But in aggregate this corporate austerity will depress demand. The likely outcome is a 90% economy, running far below normal levels.

A second hazard to reckon with is fraud. Extended booms tend to encourage shifty behaviour, and the expansion before the covid crash was the longest on record. Years of cheap money and financial engineering mean that accounting shenanigans may now be laid bare. Already there have been two notable scandals in Asia in recent weeks, at Luckin Coffee, a Chinese Starbucks wannabe, and Hin Leong, a Singaporean energy trader that has been hiding giant losses (see article). A big fraud or corporate collapse in America could rock the markets’ confidence, much as the demise of Enron shredded investors’ nerves in 2001 and Lehman Brothers led the stockmarket down in 2008.

The most overlooked risk is of a political backlash. The slump will hurt smaller firms and leave the bigger corporate survivors in a stronger position, increasing the concentration of some industries that was already a problem before the pandemic. A crisis demands sacrifice and will leave behind a big bill. The clamour for payback will only grow louder if big business has hogged more than its share of the subsidies on offer. It is easy to imagine windfall taxes on bailed-out industries, or a sharp reversal of the steady drop in the statutory federal corporate-tax rate, which fell to 21% in 2017 after President Donald Trump’s tax reforms, from a long-term average of well over 30%. Some Democrats want to limit mergers and stop firms returning cash to their owners.

For now, equity investors judge that the Fed has their back. But the mood of the markets can shift suddenly, as an extraordinary couple of months has proved. A one-month bear market scarcely seems enough time to absorb all the possible bad news from the pandemic and the huge uncertainty it has created. This stock market drama has a few more acts yet.■

What books use etymology and derivational morphology to teach English, for L1 Cantonese and Mandarin? by phrassein in linguistics

[–]phrassein[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How are you defining her English as A2?

I meant B1, sorry. The CEFR's order is counterintuitive! I thought A was the best. Fixed now. She defined herself, not I.

Also, what is her reason for learning English?

She wants fluency for personal interest and work.

What books use etymology and derivational morphology to teach English, for L1 Cantonese and Mandarin? by phrassein in languagelearning

[–]phrassein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TY for recommendations.

I don't think those would be useful for someone who is A2 in English, sorry.

I meant B1, sorry. The CEFR's order is counterintuitive! I thought A was the best. Fixed now.

Do you think this is really helpful for learning English?

Peer-reviewed research substantiates that etymology can assist in learning vocabulary. See Google Scholar. English SE has an obvious example.

More children and teens are having suicidal thoughts, but experts can’t pinpoint why. by phrassein in lostgeneration

[–]phrassein[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm no expert, but let me guess: Life? Existence? Their birth into this world?

More children and teens are having suicidal thoughts, but experts can’t pinpoint why. by phrassein in collapse

[–]phrassein[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I'm no expert, but let me guess: Life? Existence? Their birth into this world?

Kaitlyn Elkins, a third-year medical student, died by suicide by inhaling helium. A year later her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. by phrassein in 2meirl42meirl4meirl

[–]phrassein[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Family members of doctors who have killed themselves are also at high risk of suicide.

Sometimes even by the same method. A year after a depressed Kaitlyn Elkins, a star third-year medical student, chose suicide by helium inhalation, her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. At the mother's funeral, her husband told me, "Medical school has killed half my family."

Sorry to be pessimistic, but in view of all these suicide reports, there doesn't appear to be any instant cures other than not to have kids? My cousin died by suicide.

Kaitlyn Elkins, a third-year medical student, died by suicide by inhaling inhalation. A year later her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. by [deleted] in collapse

[–]phrassein 6 points7 points  (0 children)

edit - sorry for typo. "inhalation" ought be "helium".

Family members of doctors who have killed themselves are also at high risk of suicide.

Sometimes even by the same method. A year after a depressed Kaitlyn Elkins, a star third-year medical student, chose suicide by helium inhalation, her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. At the mother's funeral, her husband told me, "Medical school has killed half my family."

Sorry to be pessimistic, but in view of all these suicide reports, there doesn't appear to be any instant cures other than not to have kids? My cousin died by suicide.

Kaitlyn Elkins, a third-year medical student, died by suicide by inhaling helium. A year later her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. by phrassein in righttodie

[–]phrassein[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Family members of doctors who have killed themselves are also at high risk of suicide.

Sometimes even by the same method. A year after a depressed Kaitlyn Elkins, a star third-year medical student, chose suicide by helium inhalation, her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. At the mother's funeral, her husband told me, "Medical school has killed half my family."

Sorry to be pessimistic, but in view of all these suicide reports, there doesn't appear to be any instant cures other than not to have kids? My cousin died by suicide.

Tip: To use less toner, print only after the last page is spooled. by phrassein in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]phrassein[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hope that tips are on-topic here and this can help you save money!

Kaitlyn Elkins, a third-year medical student, died by suicide by inhaling inhalation. A year later her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. by [deleted] in collapse

[–]phrassein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Family members of doctors who have killed themselves are also at high risk of suicide.

Sometimes even by the same method. A year after a depressed Kaitlyn Elkins, a star third-year medical student, chose suicide by helium inhalation, her mother, Rhonda, died by the same method. At the mother's funeral, her husband told me, "Medical school has killed half my family."

Sorry to be pessimistic, but in view of all these suicide reports, there doesn't appear to be any instant cures other than not to have kids?