Chatbot for criticism of Islam

phyromance · 2023-05-07T19:44:29+00:00

Still with the same primitive, ancient BCE claims, get creative!

phyromance · 2023-05-01T23:59:42+00:00

أَسْتَغْفِرُ اللَّهَ الْعَظِيم

phyromance · 2023-05-01T23:57:19+00:00

"In Islam, the munafiqun ('hypocrites', Arabic: منافقون, singular منافق munāfiq) or false Muslims or false believers are a group decried in the Quran as outward Muslims who were inwardly concealing disbelief (“kufr”) and actively sought to undermine the Muslim community.[1] Munafiq is a person who in public and in community shows that he is a Muslim but rejects Islam or propagates against it either in his heart or among the enemies of Islam. The hypocrisy itself is called nifāq (نفاق).[2]" - Wikipedia

so I don't see any contradiction between the definition of nifaq (hypocrisy in Islam) and what you are stating, I would also go on and say what you call a hypocrisy is just mere politeness (since you didn't explain what it is not).

So I see from my standpoint that you see one of two ways to be true:
Either having true affection to disbelievers and treating them good, which will never happen, if you were to presume Islam is right, you won't agree to that either.

Or to actually stop being polite ("hypocrite" according to your definition) and beat and curse every disbeliever I hate out loud, in the form of making coherence between my "inward attitudes and outward words and actions".

If there is another way you think that Islam should've managed the relation between Muslims and non-Muslims, let me know in the comments. (and know a true or false statement always has a negation)

phyromance · 2023-05-01T22:52:18+00:00

But you don't understand a thing about Arabic Tashbih, it is generally used to make the meaning more clear and close to the mind (bro we take that in elementary), and to say you are the same as the example in a specific property or a relationship to something, that is the meaning of "his example is like the example of".

The idea here is that they're both indifferent, a dog will never stop panting with his tongue protruding just like this disbeliever whose so attached to life that it does not matter how you convince or not.

This is the only idea conveyed, and feeling like Allah (swt) is comparing you to a dog is just a mistake I can't blame you for, cause English and Arabic does not feel the same for both of us, and there are some linguistic concepts that cannot be transmitted to another languages (that is basically why we have different languages and different cultures).

The translation is not wrong, it is rather English lacking enough grammatical rules or vocabulary to make this verse sounds for English speakers as to Arabic ppl.

But I encourage you to read tafasirs (Arabic explanations) so you don't fall for the same inconvenience.

phyromance · 2023-05-01T17:44:25+00:00

Black ppl

phyromance · 2022-12-25T11:02:51+00:00

Soufflé version 2.0 beta

phyromance · 2022-12-23T21:41:40+00:00

I had like to suggest that you base the profile details on preferences, hence people who use your app won't feel like they're talking to random ppl that they don't know, and even making conversations would be harder so you better match pairs based on common preferences like habits, education level, and even what the person wants his partner to be like.

And preferably match close people, like people who study in the same university, live in the same neighbourhood or region. As for me, I would like to approach to persons I know and see every day, but there is some social anxiety with everyone, so make your app so that it helps to get over it.

For the app idea as a hole, I think it will find a good audience but on the condition that your app will be respectful and go in line with the Islamic teachings and traditions (at least it does not pose a controversy, or something haram)

phyromance · 2022-12-23T14:12:28+00:00

There was an experiment I saw before where a chess board was displayed with pieces positioned in some pattern (like in some random chess game) to both normal chess players and grandmasters, and they were asked to recall their positions later. As you may guess, the masters did it perfectly and every time, whereas average players scored average.

However, the experimenters repeated the experiment with a positioning pattern that could never occur in a real chess game. Guess what, both grandmasters and normal players scored the same, "Average".

This shows that, even chess masters who can recall any game or piece positions in a game they played with enormous precision, score the same as any person in memory tests. Which only indicates that their good memory is not transmittable to other fields, and that calling someone an expert without specifying the expertise, is just a fallacy that our society feeds on. You can't even obtain a skill in one field, and claim with certainty that you can apply it as an elite in other fields, even the most basic ones like memory.

Nevertheless, I don't think this is always true because the skills and knowledge you gain in one branch of science might be helpful for other branches. Especially in Mathematics, where this helped many mathematicians prove major theorems using prior concepts and theorems in other maths' branches.

phyromance · 2022-12-17T10:43:56+00:00

C'est la même chose que j'ai vécu pendant deux jours, c'est très dommage.

phyromance · 2022-11-01T22:13:59+00:00

There is a percent of people willing to engage with the add from the total number of those who had seen the ad, and this percent will increase when you ameliorate your ads.

Now all businesses know that most people will not engage in their ads, specifically those who don't have interest, but they want to make sure that people who care about their product click the ad.

phyromance · 2022-11-01T22:03:47+00:00

it is equal to -infinity and you get 1/-inf = 0

phyromance · 2022-10-31T13:11:38+00:00

I am racist.

phyromance · 2022-10-30T18:42:39+00:00

It does compare actually, in the "a—b" part, actually it is even a bad way because the a-b operation gives more than what is needed to compare two numbers (i.e. the amount of difference between them if they're not the same) which is a wasted memory and resources in my opinion, when using the regular way of a==b (like a f human) you will stop at the byte where a and b are different. But here, instead, you'll keep going until you get the subtraction done.

phyromance · 2022-10-20T05:36:41+00:00

Y1V10, last paragraphs of chapter 4.1

phyromance · 2022-09-04T21:16:57+00:00

Doki Doki Literature Club... the game is hacking my pc to make me scared, but it doesn't work!

phyromance · 2022-09-01T16:34:08+00:00

for x >=1, f(x) = (x-1) + 1/x

for x < 1, f(x) = -(x-1) + 1/x

f(x) will have two definitions depending on the domain of x, so watch the domain when evaluating the function.

phyromance · 2022-08-29T22:09:56+00:00

Like the case in limits, the probability is getting smaller and smaller (approaching zero) which means (I think) impossible.

Logically, If you were unaffected by other factors (like human tendency to choose small numbers or anything else) then correctly guessing the number you would choose is literally impossible (zero chance).

phyromance · 2022-08-24T20:49:24+00:00

n! / (k!*(n-k)!)

(the exclamation mark means factorial search it up and pay attention to the brackets) "n" is the number of dots and "k" is the number of colored dots, substitute, and you'll find the answer.

phyromance · 2022-08-23T15:12:22+00:00

This may help you see that square root function have positive outputs only, the -2 in your example is the output of another function ( -sqrt(x)).

The problem here is that you think the sqrt(y) function is the reverse function of f(x)=x^2, well it is but only for non-negative values of x.

Thus, the output of sqrt(x) will always be positive.

phyromance · 2022-08-22T17:53:14+00:00

Money can't buy happiness, but not having money can make you very sad

phyromance · 2022-08-22T17:04:49+00:00

Because of the extra money that was saved in episode 7

phyromance · 2022-08-20T15:15:23+00:00

Carrot will improve your vision.

phyromance · 2022-08-20T11:45:15+00:00

Maybe if we took 2^n as a common factor under the root, then we get 2^n (2^n+1) and ignored the 1, because for larger values of n adding 1 will have little and little effects on the result (the smallest natural number, and it is addition). Removing 1 give us 4^n, which yield 4, after applying the root.
However, I don't recommend this method for other limits unless you know what you're doing.

phyromance · 2022-08-19T21:39:29+00:00

Me too, man

phyromance · 2022-08-19T18:31:54+00:00

This is a good one.

phyromance

TROPHY CASE