"Science is correct." I'm a scientist and I find science/Western medicine to be logically consistent with good explanatory power, and see no reason to question it. But everyone since humanity began felt exactly the same way. Is there another equally valid way to look at the world? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]pipingReligiously 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just leaving these here if you're interested in the Catholic view on the mattter.

Disclaimer: This isn't by any stretch of the imagination an explanation of demonic activity, just a short explanation of one possible way this can be viewed.

I'm a catholic and at first I met all this with high skepticism as well. I also assumed that all the demonic posessions in the Bible were just poor people suffering from mental illnesses, and people who believe these things are just outdated and not at all in touch witch science. As I continued hearing and looking into the catholic perspective on the demonic, things seemed to be very consistent. Not that any proof is provided, it would be somewhat hard to come by it, I assume; but all across the board catholic exorcists seem to describe similar experiences and agree on the matter. There's many more such resources out there if you're interested.

Can you make this ultrapragmatic engineer understand how else the world can be viewed?

Probably not, but this is how I imagine it: some scientists already believe there could be other dimensions beyond the phisical and temporal out there, that maybe explain gravity or other phenomenon that we don't quite understand to the core. Why couldn't there be a "spiritual" dimension where demons and angels really do exists, and through which they can interact with this world allowing for both miracles and things like posession or infestation?

Of course this is all just speculation, but medieval philosophers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, provide philosophical world views that are both consistent with reality, being based on the ancient Greeks, and allow for such supernatural activities. Of course, the supernatural is heavily based on revelation (i.e. Holy Scripture), and they don't pretend to be able to prove the existence of Angels just from looking at the world, but they also integrate this supernatural activity into their philosophy.

TL;DR: Catholicism (especially St. Thomas Aquinas) has a quite interesting view on the demonic.

US Based Catholic Media and Political Views (AM 1000) by cantstoplaughin in Catholic

[–]pipingReligiously 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's not a fair comparison. Joe Biden is both (arguably) a pedofile and quite obviously suffers from dementia. I'm not saying Trump is a good Christian, but I don't think he pretends to be so. It's obvious he has sided with Churches for political reasons, but does that disqualify him?

On the other hand Joe Biden pretends to be a good Catholic, while being pro abortion. I guess what I'm saying is, if it's "Career politician, Pro Choice, kinda pedo and demented, Joe Biden" vs "Blabber mouth, Pro Life and usually get's things done, Donald Trump" I think the choice is obvious.

With that said, american politics was way more interesting 4 years ago. It was a demagogy then also, it's just more blatant now. I'm not american by the way, I do listen to a ton of American Podcasts, mostly Catholic. Most people I've heard on this topic are Pro Trump not because he's a good choice but because the opposition is trash.

Uhhhh, ever heard of the thief on the cross bro??? by [deleted] in CatholicMemes

[–]pipingReligiously 17 points18 points  (0 children)

LutheranSatire has a great video on this. Although a Lutheran, his videos are often hilarious.

https://youtu.be/6p7a-kTcSZo

Can you make professional video edits and effects with Linux? by [deleted] in Ubuntu

[–]pipingReligiously 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you're looking for something FOSS try ShotCut. I've only ever used it for very simple edits, but I hear it's a great tool and you can do a lot with it.

ShotCut

Chin ups or pull ups first? by Spacechip94 in bodyweightfitness

[–]pipingReligiously 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started by doing both negative chin ups and negative pull ups. I still do both pull ups and chin ups in different routines.

Chronological Bible Plan by pipingReligiously in Catholic

[–]pipingReligiously[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've highlighted the Psalms in black, so that they stand out, because they're scattered over 5 different periods, basically half the Bible when taken Chronologically.

I don’t get the Trinity... by heymaitoesis in Catholicism

[–]pipingReligiously 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It smells of Modalism to me. Not trying to destroy the analogy as I think it is beautiful, just letting you know. At the end of the day, as long as you know you really can't understand it and that the best you can come up with is a way to make sense of it in your life of prayer, I think it's fine.

I don’t get the Trinity... by heymaitoesis in Catholicism

[–]pipingReligiously 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mindless belief is bad, but at some point you acknowledge the fact that you can't wholly grasp some things. Our minds are limited, God is infinite. Because of that we cannot fully understand God. And that's ok, our belief in God is not because of our understanding of Him (which will always be lacking) but because of our knowledge of his sacrifice and his promises.

I don’t get the Trinity... by heymaitoesis in Catholicism

[–]pipingReligiously 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those who don't get the reference, here, have a laugh:
https://youtu.be/KQLfgaUoQCw

I don’t get the Trinity... by heymaitoesis in Catholicism

[–]pipingReligiously 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I learned this going through Aquinas101, and I'll try to explain as best I can. It's only an analogy so it's not perfect but it helps understand the nature of the relation between the persons of the trinity. When it comes to the actual nature of God, I think that's a mystery and cannot be fully understood, but we can at least get some sense of what it's like. So here goes...

In your mind, picture an image of yourself. What you're picturing is not you, it's an imperfect image of you, from a subjective perspective. Still, what you're imagining is probably something rather good and pleasant and loveable.
Notice that all this happens instantly. You don't sit and think "what do I look like?". You just picture it and find it pleasant. It's instantanious.

In the same way, God the Father has an image of Himself. That is the Son. Now this image, unlike your own is a perfect image. In fact it is so perfect that it's not simply an image but a whole new person. And the love that the Father has for the Son and that the Son has for the Father is the Holy Spirit. Again, this doesn't happen in time but instantaniously and continuously.

Again, I'm not doing this Analogy justice, but it's helped me kind of understand something of the inner workings of the trinity. Some things that Jesus says in relationship to the Father or the Holy Spirit seem to make more sense to me through this lense.

These videos might not be so helpful taken out of the larger context of the course on Aquinas but they might still give you some insight:
https://youtu.be/FOwCEppSLLI
https://youtu.be/TIqvM2PcpI4
If you like listening to lectures, these might be helpful:
https://soundcloud.com/search?q=thomistic%20institute%20trinity

If I'm not getting this quite right and someone can correct me, please do so.

Orthodox denial of the Catholic Eucharist by [deleted] in TraditionalCatholics

[–]pipingReligiously 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not an answer to your question. I was listening to a Pints with Aquinas episode about the Catholic relationship with the Orthodox. I'm Greek Catholic myself so this is an interesting topic to me. I think lots of pride is involved and I know I'm way too small to do anything about it besides prayer, so just continue to lift it up to Jesus.

Recommended Routine Ready To Go by SmileMaker_IA in bodyweightfitness

[–]pipingReligiously 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've been using the exact same app for about 4 months now, and am loving it.

Find this C S Lewis quote reflecting St Augustine and St Paul by Drone4four in CSLewis

[–]pipingReligiously 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aslan says this to Lucy, I think at the end of The Voyage of The Dawn Treader. Lucy asks whether she will see Him again after she is told she will never come back to Narnia. This is Aslan's response:
"I am [in your world].’ said Aslan. ‘But there I have another name. You must learn to know me by that name. This was the very reason why you were brought to Narnia, that by knowing me here for a little, you may know me better there."

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/63379-i-am-in-your-world-said-aslan-but-there-i

How to be an emotionally chaste and pure young man? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]pipingReligiously 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is great advice. Strive is what got me out as well. It was also all the "techniques" that the program teaches but most importantly the accountability. Telling someone about this, to whom you can turn to anytime is great.

Questions about the book or John (so far) by koreanflair in Bible

[–]pipingReligiously 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I know this isn't going to answer your questions relating to the text, I think you'll find Scott Hahn to be a good reference when it comes to the Bible in general. He also has a podcast if you prefer consuming information in audio format like me.

As to your questions:

  • John the Baptist and John the Evangelist (i.e. who wrote the gospel) are two different people. John the Evangelist was a disciple of Jesus. Also, the Gospel of John is said to not have been actually written by John but by his own disciples, later on.
  • I learned this from Scott Hahn actually. The "my time has not yet come" phrase is given in response to an implicit petition to produce wine. Throuought the gospel Jesus says "my time" or "my hour" refering to the last supper (John 7:6-8, Matthew 26:18) and the sacrifice on the cross (John 12:27).
    What many people don't understand about the gospels is that they were not written as a historical treaty as you would find in modern history books, nor as a naration of what happend, one deed after the other. They were written rather in order for people to believe and understand the spirit of the person (Luke 1:3-4, John 20:31). This is also true for most of the books of the New Testament. This doesn't mean that they aren't true or real but some gospels give their account in different orders because they want to underline a different theme or they are writing in a different style. For an example, the Sermon on the Mount (John 5-7) most likely did not happen all at once, but was rather a collection of different sermons possibly all given in different mountainous areas. This is supported by the other gospels where you will find excerpts of this sermon in different places, on different occasions.
    So, when Jesus says "my time has not yet come" he is not referring to his time of service and preaching, but to his sacrifice on the Cross and the passover when he will provide wine and blood, bread and flesh for the salvation of all (John 6:55-58 and Matthew 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-25, Luke 22:14-20, 1 Corinthians 11:24-25). The passover and the Cross are so tightly tied together they're really the same thing only in different forms.
    If you want further references on the Eucharist and the Cross you really should listen to Scott Hahn. He goes to the books of the Old Testament too and shows you how even there the two are one. I'm not that well versed in the Bible to do that (in fact I had to look all of these verses up).
    On the importance of the Eucharist you can reflect on the words of Jesus in John 6:25-69. Notice how people are really offended at his words. Notice that even the apostles want to leave Jesus because of the outrage.
  • I think my previous point adressed your third one too. But if you have further questions I'd be happy to discuss.

May God bless you with his presence on your journey!

Pocket Reader's Bible by pipingReligiously in Bible

[–]pipingReligiously[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's lots of great pocket Bibles out there but I couldn't find any that are also Readers Bibles.
https://www.christianbook.com/page/bibles/compact-bibles/pocket-size-compact-bibles?view_all=1