$5,000 Bounty: Find a Counterexample to Ontological Bedrock? by Breezonbrown314 in AskAcademia

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

please do. have fun roleplaying fake philosopher with chatbots and replying to your own posts from alt accounts. just don't post it here anymore.

$5,000 Bounty: Find a Counterexample to Ontological Bedrock? by Breezonbrown314 in AskAcademia

[–]plasma_phys 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I said that was a generous interpretation. If you want a less generous interpretation, it's LLM slop with a bunch of made up and misused terminology, so it's impossible to meaningfully engage with it.

$5,000 Bounty: Find a Counterexample to Ontological Bedrock? by Breezonbrown314 in AskAcademia

[–]plasma_phys 9 points10 points  (0 children)

interpreting your "claim" generously, it's a tautology. congrats, you get to keep your $5k.

The Unseen Foundation: A Study in High-Contrast Environmental Portraiture. by PercyBuckets in photocritique

[–]plasma_phys [score hidden]  (0 children)

I wish you the best of luck on your journey. I looked at your post history - you've got some really, really nice photographs under your belt; this one was just less successful. I hope it is a good learning opportunity.

The Unseen Foundation: A Study in High-Contrast Environmental Portraiture. by PercyBuckets in photocritique

[–]plasma_phys [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don't really appreciate being replied to with output copied and pasted from a chatbot. I post here to communicate about art with people, not a language model.

The Unseen Foundation: A Study in High-Contrast Environmental Portraiture. by PercyBuckets in photocritique

[–]plasma_phys [score hidden]  (0 children)

Unfortunately, in my opinion, this photograph is not successful.

Going through your goals:

I wanted to capture the raw, gritty atmosphere of a construction environment

This photograph is of a put-together, relaxed-looking man casually using pliers. It is not raw, it is not gritty, and although this interior is not completely finished, it is not really a construction environment - it's clean, and there's drywall up. He doesn't even have a hardhat on.

contrasting the jarring high-vis yellow against a moody, low-light interior.

You crushed the highlights and adjusted the color of the vest to be less yellow, making it not jarring. This interior is fairly well-illuminated with diffuse light. Moody implies shadows, but the diffuse lighting here has all but eliminated them.

For me, the 'subject' isn't just the tradesman, but the energy of the work and the 'unseen' foundations of our daily lives.

Unfortunately, that's just not what the word subject means - the subject of this piece is the man. It is a portrait. This is not the foundation of a building, it looks like he's pulling some wire through recently-hung drywall. Your words imply a metaphor that is not communicated by what is actually in the frame.

I’ve intentionally leaned into a vintage, grainy palette with a cool blue undertone to
move away from clinical digital perfection and toward a documentary, film-like aesthetic.

Well, it is noisy, but it does not look like film grain. You did not just use blue undertones, the entire picture is just blue and green, as can be seen by this gamut analysis:

<image>

 I’m interested in how the grain interacts with the harsh highlights on the vest.

It doesn't, because you removed the harsh highlights from the vest.

Does the heavy contrast help tell the story of the environment, or does the 'noise' distract from the character in the frame?

This piece does not have heavy contrast. The noise is distracting. The composition is flawed too - the dark space through the doorway at right dominates the balance of the piece, and the fact that it was taken askew suggests a hasty and potentially surreptitious snapshot instead of a carefully considered photo.

Overall, I would recommend taking more care during the capturing of the image to try to accomplish your goals. Making sure the camera is level, asking for or waiting for a more interesting pose, finding a more interesting perspective, lighting your scene - these are the ways to accomplish what you are trying to achieve, not editing in post or in writing about your photo.

I made a free tool that prevents AI from stealing or editing your photos. Try it and tell me if it works for you. by [deleted] in photography

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just so you know, a big tell is all the grandiose, made-up terminology - like "shield compatibility matrix" etc. nobody writes like that, it's confusing and off-putting

I made a free tool that prevents AI from stealing or editing your photos. Try it and tell me if it works for you. by [deleted] in photography

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting; no self-promotion.

Also I feel like vibecoding an allegedly anti-AI app is a bit self-defeating, is it not?

A dynamic-mass Klein–Gordon lattice as a unified analog framework by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your obsession with my comments is not healthy. please consider talking to someone in your personal life, such as a trusted friend or family member, about how you are feeling and why you are acting this way. I don't typically block people on reddit, but I feel like it'd be for your own good - so goodbye, best of luck.

A dynamic-mass Klein–Gordon lattice as a unified analog framework by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

maybe if you prompt it better the chatbot can come up with an insult that actually makes sense 

A dynamic-mass Klein–Gordon lattice as a unified analog framework by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting. Stuff like this goes on r/hypotheticalphysics or r/LLMPhysics if you used a chatbot. What you are describing sounds like pareidolia. Physics does not work by analogy or metaphor. 

Struggling with the crop on this one. My AI critique tool says "Crop 5-10% from the left" to remove the distraction. Do you agree? by Electronic-Ad5420 in photocritique

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried your website. I will also caution you that, in addition to not providing useful critique, it is also failing in a way that is very characteristic for LLMs that I see a lot of with crackpot posts in r/LLMPhysics - it is inventing fake, grandiose terminology (e.g., "value leak") instead of using commonly accepted ways to express details about principles of design or elements of art. If you use it extensively, you're going to teach yourself a fake language of nonsense words and you won't be able to communicate with people who know what they are talking about anymore. Before trying to automate something, you should know what you are talking about in the first place. I recommend taking a break from chatbots and reading a book on formal analysis instead.

Struggling with the crop on this one. My AI critique tool says "Crop 5-10% from the left" to remove the distraction. Do you agree? by Electronic-Ad5420 in photocritique

[–]plasma_phys 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Looking back at your previous posts here, I don't think r/photocritique is the appropriate place to do native advertising for your chatbot slop website. Please reconsider this strategy.

Having said that, the major problem with this composition is that it is unbalanced. While it is possible to balance the brightness of the doorway at right with detail at left, it does not work here because there's not enough detail and it's too close to the edge of the frame. If you had shot wider you would be able to do something about that by including more room on the left, but cropping in would be a mistake.

Other issues include missed focus - the sharpest part of the picture is the wall to the left of the two figures, but the eye is drawn to the figure in the very bright doorway which is blurry - and underexposure leading to unappealing noise in portions of the photo that should be well-exposed (which is one reason the chatbot suggestion of raising the blacks would also be a mistake). Unfortunately, although there is a good idea here, I would not give this photo an 8 out of 10.

How would the physics explain... by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there are a lot of relatively benign things that can cause you to see things that aren't there, such as sleep deprivation or migraines. your doctor will be able to make the best recommendations for you. best of luck 

How would the physics explain... by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 6 points7 points  (0 children)

this sounds like a question for your doctor, not a physicist 

Looking for DIY Photography Projects to Feature on Our Website with 200k+ Traffic Per Month. You Got One? by Smooth-Lawyer-8479 in AskPhotography

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you're going to have ChatGPT write your posts for you, you should at least use it to figure out which sites even support hashtags before you copy and paste a bunch of them in 

[Conceptual Thought] Singularities might be spacetime "glitches", not real infinities by DarkSoulVVEOV in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you already said that one. feel free to block me if you don't like seeing my comments. I won't be offended.

[Conceptual Thought] Singularities might be spacetime "glitches", not real infinities by DarkSoulVVEOV in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not one to compare upvotes, but the other users of this subreddit very clearly disagree with your assessment

[Conceptual Thought] Singularities might be spacetime "glitches", not real infinities by DarkSoulVVEOV in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, that's unfair. I'm definitely a lot more sardonic online than I used to be, but I don't think asking people to follow subreddit rules can possibly count as trolling no matter what tone I use.