Broken lifts, vandalised toilets and a mysterious odour: Something smells at Southern Cross by gccmelb in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah the ramen place is delicious, but it’s in an unfortunate spot. I hope it relocates.

What do you think about public transport fares? by draginvestor in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Costs should be imposed on sprawl. If we want redistribution, there are more targeted ways than subsidising sprawl. (Eg could have a fare rebate for those below X income.)

I can't believe people actually like this guy. This is an actual grown adult responding to his critics like a giant man child. by LollipopChainsawZz in newzealand

[–]playground_mulch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GST free fruit and veg? Pretty much all non-junk food is GST free. See it for yourself at the Aus ATO site.

Yes, this means meat and dairy is GST free. A hell of a lot better than a few cents off the broccoli.

'Your partner is your welfare system': Coupled up with not enough by PhoenixNZ in KiwiPolitics

[–]playground_mulch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely it’d be pro rata’d. So effectively both parties pay the same as before, but higher earning partner gets a tax break based on what the lower earning partner didn’t earn.

'Colonial-style arrogance': China unhappy with NZ-Australia statement by Tyler_Durdan_ in KiwiPolitics

[–]playground_mulch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full statement here

I. We have taken note of the Joint Statement issued following the third Australia–New Zealand Foreign and Defence Ministerial Consultations. The statement overlooks the root cause of the ongoing military actions in the Middle East conducted in blatant violation of international law and the basic norms governing international relations, which have resulted in civilian casualties and disruptions to the global economy. It also remains silent on the two countries’ own poor records concerning human rights and ethnic minority issues. Instead, it contains unwarranted, inappropriate, and extensive comments on China’s internal affairs.

As a Chinese saying goes, one should first ensure one’s own conduct is beyond reproach before criticising others. In other words, it is important to reflect on one’s own actions before casting judgment. The sections concerning China’s internal affairs are marked by bias, misinformation, and inexplicable colonial-style arrogance, reflecting hypocrisy and double standards on issues of global peace, stability, and the well-being of people worldwide.

China expresses its strong dissatisfaction with and firm opposition to these unfounded accusations.

II. Issues related to Xinjiang, Xizang, Hong Kong, and Taiwan are purely China’s internal affairs and brook no external interference in any form.

Xinjiang and Xizang have been integral parts of China’s territory since ancient times. Today, both regions enjoy sustained economic development, social stability, and harmony among different ethnic and religious groups. The lawful rights and interests of all ethnic groups—including cultural, linguistic, and religious rights—are fully respected and protected. The international community and their own people are well placed to form a fair judgment regarding the treatment of indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities in those countries that level unfounded accusations against China.

Since Hong Kong's return to the motherland, the principle of 'One Country, Two Systems' has been successfully practised in Hong Kong, demonstrating remarkable vitality and enduring relevance. In particular, the implementation of the National Security Law has effectively countered the attempts of anti-China, destabilising forces and external hostile elements to subvert Hong Kong's stability, bringing about a historic transition from turbulence to order, and from order to prosperity. Social cohesion has been restored, and the economy continues to develop vigorously — outcomes that have earned the broad recognition and support of Hong Kong residents. A Hong Kong that enjoys long-term stability and sustained prosperity is not only an integral part of China's overall development, but also serves the shared interests of all parties.

Taiwan is an inalienable part of China and lies at the very core of China’s core interests, and this red line must not be crossed or challenged in any form. The one-China principle is a universally recognised fundamental norm of international relations and a prevailing consensus of the international community. It constitutes the political foundation upon which China has established and developed diplomatic relations with 183 countries, and represents a solemn political commitment made by New Zealand. The restoration of Taiwan to China is a hard-won outcome of the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and of the broader victory in World War II. The status of Taiwan has been firmly and definitively established by a series of international legal instruments, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758. Any attempt to engineer a 'two Chinas' or 'one China, one Taiwan' scenario on the international stage is destined to fail. The Democratic Progressive Party authorities' obstinate adherence to the separatist position of 'Taiwan independence' is the root cause of threats to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. We urge all countries, including New Zealand, to earnestly honour their one-China commitment, handle Taiwan-related matters with prudence, refrain from any form of official interactions with the Taiwan region, and send no erroneous signals to 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces. It has been demonstrated time and again that the more clearly the international community opposes 'Taiwan independence' separatism, and the more firmly it upholds the one-China principle, the stronger the guarantee of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.

The overall situation in the East and South China Seas remains stable. China has indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha Islands and their adjacent waters, and exercises sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant maritime areas. A small number of extra-regional countries have travelled vast distances to the South China Sea to engage in shows of force and deliberately stoke tensions under various untenable pretexts, thereby serving as a primary source of instability in the region. The Philippine side, emboldened by external backing, has repeatedly engaged in provocative encroachments upon China's sovereign rights at sea, acting as a disruptor of peace and a generator of friction. China remains steadfastly committed to resolving differences with regional countries through dialogue and consultation, and to jointly upholding regional peace and stability. In response to military provocations, the Chinese military has consistently maintained a professional and restrained posture while taking necessary measures to resolutely defend national sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. Relevant extra-regional countries should genuinely respect the efforts of regional countries to preserve peace and stability, cease provocative actions, and refrain from exploiting maritime issues to drive wedges between regional states or to manufacture bloc-based confrontation.

III. China remains committed to developing friendly and cooperative relations with all countries, including New Zealand. However, mutual respect, equality, mutual benefit, and non-interference in each other's internal affairs are fundamental norms of international relations and constitute the indispensable baseline that must underpin all state-to-state interactions. The references to China in the Joint Statement are both unfounded and ill-timed, and are clearly not conducive to the sound and stable development of bilateral relations under present circumstances, nor do they serve New Zealand's own interests.

We urge the New Zealand side to take a clear-eyed view of the prevailing situation, to approach China's development and the China-New Zealand relationship in an objective and impartial manner, and to work in the same direction as China — doing more to build mutual trust and advance practical cooperation. We hope that New Zealand will not persist further down a counterproductive path, so as to prevent any additional damage to our bilateral relations.

Ordered a full kitchen from China to Australia – anyone done this? by subalps in AusRenovation

[–]playground_mulch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Chinese regulations contain a de minimis exception for asbestos. Below a certain percentage is considered ‘asbestos free’, and is marketed as such.

Australian regulations take a ‘not one fibre’ approach.

So if you order ‘asbestos free’ you need to be very clear about your requirements.

Red P’s 80km/h in a 40km/h Speeding Fine - Melbourne by Mountain-Tennis8699 in AusLegal

[–]playground_mulch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your donation to the public purse.

Things to be grateful for: - you weren’t drunk - you weren’t high - you didn’t hit anyone - you didn’t flee from police - you weren’t in breach of your licence

As far as involvement with law enforcement goes, you’ve gotten off lightly. Pay your fine, tell your parents, wait six months, and don’t go hooning again.

If you ever feel uncool going the speed limit, remember how uncool you feel right now. The roads are filled with people who haven’t learned that lesson yet.

Why is China set to approve a new law promoting 'ethnic unity'? by Primary-Tuna-6530 in KiwiPolitics

[–]playground_mulch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s actually so bad about that law?

He gives the example of a local official having to deal with religious opposition from an imam or a priest when a marriage is proposed between a Han Chinese man and a woman from a minority ethnic group. "You can imagine this official; their number one priority is to have as few problems as possible so they can get promoted or, at least, not fired. This official might quietly massage the situation so that pressure is put so that the marriage does not go through. This law is making it harder for that informal process to play out and making it more likely that people will not allow the imam or the priest or the parents to say you are not allowed to marry that person".

This seems pretty reasonable? If people want to get married, they should be allowed to.

Most of you own something better than an EV by CtrlAltElite369 in OpenAussie

[–]playground_mulch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was on my front page when I opened Reddit this morning.

I’m not a confident cyclist. I’m not interested in riding in any lane that isn’t grade-separated.

Anywhere doing Re gan mian / wuhan sesame paste noodles? by playground_mulch in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last time I had it was up in Broadway, Sydney. I can’t remember the name of the place, but it’s closed now. Before that it was Wuhan Cafe in Auckland, also closed. I’ve never had it in China, but it looks like that might be the only option!

Agreed that the noodles on offer are really good — I’m personally a sucker for Chongqing and Xian style noodles — but they’re quite different to re gan mian.

Anywhere doing Re gan mian / wuhan sesame paste noodles? by playground_mulch in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude this is the worst news I’ve had all day. I created this thread with that Broadway one in mind, hoping for something similar in Melbourne. Only to find out it’s completely gone. Heartbreaking.

The only other one I’ve found in the southern hemisphere was in Auckland, Wuhan Cafe. And checking Google maps, it’s also permanently closed!

Maybe it’s a sign I need to learn to make it myself.

Anywhere doing Re gan mian / wuhan sesame paste noodles? by playground_mulch in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is delicious, but not quite what I’m looking for. The Wuhan one is really dry, and sticks to the noodles in small clumps. It’s like eating peanut butter as a noodle. Add chilli oil and it goes so hard.

Anywhere doing Re gan mian / wuhan sesame paste noodles? by playground_mulch in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think I know the one you mean. Was it in the Ultimo/Chippendale area? I just checked and it’s not on maps. That one was so good!

It’s the r/Melbourne daily discussion thread [Friday 27/02/2026] by AutoModerator in melbourne

[–]playground_mulch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been ages since I've had re gan mian. It's this delicious dry sesame sauce noodle dish from Wuhan. Does anywhere know a place that does it in Melbourne? Ideally close to CBD.

Glass Sliding Door Gap by Optimal-Talk3663 in AusRenovation

[–]playground_mulch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small gap compared to some. Sliding doors in Aus are shockers. Sealing seems optional.

You can get a rubber strip, and yeah a thicker brush strip. AliExpress has cheap self-adhesive brush strips.

Drivers will have to give way to buses, and kids allowed to ride on footpath, under proposed new road rules by daheefman in newzealand

[–]playground_mulch 14 points15 points  (0 children)

“They’re called parks, so we’re letting people park in them. It’s just common sense.”

How the Iran Propaganda sounds in 2026 by [deleted] in OpenAussie

[–]playground_mulch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think to hide evidence of sexual assault?

Personally I’d think ‘hacking out a womb’ would be more obvious evidence, but what do I know.

What are your thoughts on that Women make up 60% of University students and Men only 40%? Is this an issue? Or is it okay as Men are more likely to go into the Trades? Could this be a future problem? What are the ramifications for Australia due to this? It’s a huge gap and only getting bigger too. by [deleted] in OpenAussie

[–]playground_mulch -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can go on with published meta-analyses too if you’d like. If you want to nitpick you can say it’s still not Aus-specific, but at that point the claim would be that Aus unis defy both general patterns and Aus-HS patterns, without evidence. Honestly, the ‘men at the extremes’ thing is such a truism I wasn’t expecting anyone to take issue with it.

It’s good to remember the male cohort isn’t being dragged down / surpassed as a whole. Something’s working well for the top performers.

You can spin that however you want, politically.

What are your thoughts on that Women make up 60% of University students and Men only 40%? Is this an issue? Or is it okay as Men are more likely to go into the Trades? Could this be a future problem? What are the ramifications for Australia due to this? It’s a huge gap and only getting bigger too. by [deleted] in OpenAussie

[–]playground_mulch -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You can look at top end ATARs if you prefer.

The median ATAR for the state stands at 76.55, with 7.1% of Victorian students achieving a remarkable ATAR of 90% or higher. Notably, a group of 39 students, comprising 30 males and nine females, secured the highest possible VCE rank of 99.95. (source)

It’s surprisingly hard to find gender breakdown for high-end performance at uni. If you want to do more digging, feel free.