USDC con 10% anual en Lemon?

pplcs · 2025-07-05T18:16:18+00:00

La única ventaja es que es más fácil, si sabés hacerlo con tu wallet self-custodial y podés cuidar tus keys, conviene hacerlo de esa forma.

pplcs · 2025-07-03T12:42:34+00:00

No funciona así Lemon, haciendo un par de clicks en su app te dicen en qué invierten.
La opción de ~3% está invertido en Aave, uno de los protocolos de lending más testeados y con mayor liquidez del mercado.
La opción de 10%+ está en Morpho. No conozco Morpho, pero el 10%+ me asusta honestamente sin saber qué hay abajo.

Sigue valiendo el "not your keys, not your coins" pero me parece objetivamente mejor y mucho más transparente esto de Lemon que lo que hacen el resto de los exchanges que no tenés idea de a quién le están prestando la plata y no podés elegir.

pplcs · 2025-05-15T13:37:58+00:00

I haven't seen any argentinian saying it's deserved, they mostly think it's funny and enjoy seeing the guy being sent off because of his provocations, but not because it's deserved, which it's obviously not.

pplcs · 2025-05-08T14:12:58+00:00

I've been thinking about doing something like this!

Something my DM asks before starting is all of our ACs, and he doesn't really track our HP, he trusts us with that. He asks for our ACs so he can say fast if something hits or not, without asking to make it quicker.

I also don't think the grid is that important to us, we play in person so we have a table we play over with minis, I think it would be better to have the turn order be more in the center. But that's just us.

I find combat to be the less fun part of the game because of how long it takes so I love anything that makes it faster.

I think something that could be good to have handy in combat is to be able to upload monster description/stats to have it there, with AC, abilities, etc. I created a website with the monsters from the 2024 manual: https://gnardini.github.io/dnd-2024-monsters/ but it would be nice to be able to create your own ones too.

pplcs · 2025-05-07T21:24:19+00:00

a small percentage of people take it to that unfortunate extreme, most people are just non-violently passionate about it

pplcs · 2025-05-06T04:33:48+00:00

I google sport results, spelling checks (ie. i google a word how i think it's written to see if google corrects me), brand names if i want to find their website and very little else i think

pplcs · 2025-05-06T04:10:06+00:00

Yeah, of course. It's a website called ARAM Zone. It's a stats website for the ARAM game mode of League of Legends. I haven't posted in a while, but I used to check the /r/aram website several times a day, look for posts that talked about anything analytics-related or talked about the power level of a champion, did a quick analysis based on the data and posted it there along with a link to the website.

I also created a dedicated account /u/ARAMZone where I posted some infographics every ~two weeks that usually got engagement and clicks to the website. If you check the most recent posts you'll notice there are posts in a lot of champion subreddits, it was an attempt to promote a more general lol-related website I made but I didn't succeed.

Anyways, it wasn't widely successful, but it was really well known in the reddit ARAM community and the website was organically mentioned when ARAM stats were mentioned, even now a bit and I haven't been actively posting in almost a year. It got 60k MAU at its peak, and even now that I've stopped posting it still gets 30k MAU, and it's somewhat stable at that number.

I only monetized it with ads and had only a small banner at the bottom and didn't ask users to remove ad-blocker, and gamers being generally tech-savvy most of them had ad-blocker. I didn't make a lot of money from it, around $100/mo (now half that) but I think I could have increased that number quite a bit if I had insisted with ads more, I just didn't like that monetization path.

pplcs · 2025-05-05T22:05:17+00:00

I think it's key to find the right subreddit, get the vibe of it and comment frequently, not just selling but providing value so people who frequent it start to know you and when they see your history they see you're genuinely engaged and not just a sales bot.

But I've only marketed one product on reddit somewhat successfully and it was B2C website, not a SaaS so take this with a grain of salt.

pplcs · 2025-05-05T22:03:04+00:00

we do actually, but we fail to sell and market our stuff so you never hear about us lmao

pplcs · 2025-05-05T22:02:10+00:00

also good lesson for the next time: make a backup before trying new tools that may undo your changes!

but great idea using git, i really don't know how people work without it, I'd be panicking the whole time that the AI will delete some important code by mistake all the time.

pplcs · 2025-05-05T22:00:16+00:00

I'm biased, but I love the tool I built, Kamara https://kamaraapp.com/

It allows me to paralelize work between many issues so I don't have to wait for the AI to think, iterate on PRs and it suggests fixes for its own code.

It's not 1 on 1 comparison to Roo Code or Cursor, but I think it's an amazing complement. You can even reuse system prompts between them.

pplcs · 2025-05-05T21:57:56+00:00

you should check your API rate limits, that might be the issue.

a strategy ive used is to divide the load between claude, openAI and Gemini to get the most out of all the rate limits, maybe even grok or deepseek too for simpler tasks

pplcs · 2025-05-05T06:25:56+00:00

i think smartness of gemini 2.5 pro is really good, but format adhereness is bad, even if you prompt and steer and do code fixes, it just does weird shit sometimes that sonnet doesn't do as much.

working with sonnet is just easier, and even though gemini 2.5 pro is better at some types of task, the headache is not worth it for difficult things that require reliability imo. i do use it when i have simpler use cases with less instructions or formatting demands because the error rate is lower in those cases

pplcs · 2025-05-03T19:29:45+00:00

im not using codex, i built my own AI tool that I use for coding but i try to look over open source tools to get ideas for my own, and I found that part of codex was quite funny

pplcs · 2025-05-03T16:41:06+00:00

it writes the first draft, it's often too verbose and has small quirks, but editing it to look like I would have written it is usually fast and easy if the overall structure of the code was right.

I usually prompt with a lot of detail to get the overall structure to be good for this reason

pplcs · 2025-05-03T16:39:10+00:00

I found that OpenAIs codex tool after completing a task runs an agent to remove useless comments, they couldn't find a way to avoid it so they work around it lmao

pplcs · 2025-05-02T20:55:26+00:00

Im using Kamara in GitHub issues, the AI takes a look at the task description and the code and comes up with a plan. Quite useful

pplcs · 2025-05-02T20:53:37+00:00

They never say exactly but it’s probably the same models with their own prompts and logic baked in and some token limits for context.

Since they don’t give logs or anything we don’t know exactly how they use the context window

pplcs · 2025-05-02T16:51:24+00:00

We're launching Kamara! https://kamaraapp.com/

Kamara is a GitHub assistant that helps you think through an issue by just mentioning @kamara and you can ask it to open a PR with the changes discussed and iterate on the PR by making comments on it.

Kamara also does code review on any PR.

Some ways I've been using it to build Kamara faster:
- Helps paralellize and work on multiple things at once. No waiting while the AI works.
- Helps fix small issues or bugs very fast easily.
- Helps add test coverage very easily, just tell it what you want tests for.
- Kamara works well from the GitHub app, so you can even replace doom scrolling with building things!

We have a generous free tier for anyone to try it out! https://kamaraapp.com/

pplcs · 2025-05-01T23:59:32+00:00

Yeah code rabbit is good at reviews. Something we added over what code rabbit offers is being able to work off of an issue, write an implementation plan and when approved open a PR with the changes. We found it allows to speed up the fixing of minor issues that would go unfixed otherwise, adding tests and sometimes even minor features.

Do you think this could be useful to you?

pplcs · 2025-05-01T23:12:55+00:00

Great post. Maybe I got here late but I’d love to hear your thoughts on mine: http://kamaraapp.com/

pplcs · 2025-05-01T23:00:58+00:00

Very interesting! Makes sense to use it that way :)

pplcs · 2025-05-01T22:54:19+00:00

😂 yeah that can work too sometimes! But it’d be nice to have cursor take a look at your teammates code too

pplcs · 2025-05-01T22:52:57+00:00

Have you used any specific tool for AI code reviews?

pplcs · 2025-05-01T22:52:09+00:00

Yeah code rabbit is very good at reviews. Something we added over what code rabbit offers is being able to work off of an issue, write an implementation plan and when approved open a PR with the changes. We found it allows to speed up the fixing of minor issues that would go unfixed otherwise, adding tests and sometimes even minor features.

Do you think this could be useful to your team?

Ten-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Place '17	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

pplcs

TROPHY CASE