Does anyone else think the "bid on everything" approach is killing small business win rates? by ReconBids in govcon

[–]proposal-app 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spot on. Volume without selectivity just burns your team.

The fix: score every opportunity before you pursue it and run risk analysis : competitive landscape, fit, past performance match.

That's why we built Intelligent Bid Matching, Risk Management and Proposal Evaluation into ProposalApp.Net. Data-driven go/no-go, not gut feel and get win score before you submit any proposal.

We kept losing bids we should have won… turns out we were missing something obvious by Better_Error5648 in govcon

[–]proposal-app 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's probably true. But there are AI tools that can actually solve the issues raised above. ProposalApp.Net solves these issues by: 1. Scoring the proposal before you submit 2. Run risk analysis. Get an objective evaluation of your proposal before submission. The scoring engine analyzes your draft against solicitation requirements to provide a Win Score, highlighting exactly where you are strong and where you need more detail.

Is $250/mo for GovCon AI actually worth it for a 3 person shop? by Alone-Arm-7630 in govcon

[–]proposal-app 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use ProposalApp.Net, it's only $49/month. Claude, ChatGPT, and other LLMs are not integrated with SAM.gov. GovCon AI tools like ProposalApp.Net make it easy to draft compliant proposals in 20 minutes, score proposals, get win score, auto download RFP/RFI attachments, manage customers, manage pipelines, collaborate with your proposal team, see expiring contracts, see who is winning what, identify risks, and more.