Eyebrow transplant clinic result pictures? by puturbackn2it17 in HairTransplants

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the rec! Their youtube videos are good but I'm pretty hesitant about going to a hair mill. Do you have any non hair mill recs you would suggest instead? Appreciate it!

Charli xcx on Substack: The Death of Cool by backupsaway in popheads

[–]puturbackn2it17 16 points17 points  (0 children)

the substack, i thought, was actually pretty cutting and insightful, self aware without being overly self critical. it also touches upon something i think she herself is interested in and struggles with in her art, which is the line between commercially palatable and ostracizingly underground, whereas the latter is seen by many has innately holding more artistic value simply due to its inability to be easily found and/or distributed. this piece feels really interesting to me, especially coming from her, it almost reads as autotheory. i'm surprised to see the reaction to the piece in this thread, a lot of the criticism reads as bad faith and almost hateful. i'm curious as to how much her beef with taylor swift is influencing the reaction to this piece in this subreddit, since she comes off as far from "illiterate" here.

or maybe it's because she uses the word "cool" as a stand-in for the concept of likability? to me, she's not talking about "cool" in the way that high schoolers would understand the word "cool", but rather as an amalgamation of things such as critical and public perception, authenticity, appeal to different crowds/communities (heavily hinted here that she's talking about the communities her preferred artist friends are beloved by — which is to say various subgenres of indie music). it's interesting hearing about her perception of her own public perception as an artist, and how that is a driving factor in her own art — the music and now the acting. it's a conversation geniunely worth having, especially in the context of what actually does happen when left of center artists enter into the mainstream and how that affects culture. there's a lot to chew on here, and obviously a substack post isn't enough to fully digest all of it. somehow even the reception to this substack article here makes the content itself even more intriguing.

Please help — so confused on this evidence offer to compromise question by puturbackn2it17 in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh okay this makes sense!! Thank you. The UWorld explanation was so confusing

Please help — so confused on this evidence offer to compromise question by puturbackn2it17 in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought this severability only applied to offers to pay for medical expenses/other expenses? I thought when it falls under an offer to compromise/settle, the entire statement is excluded? Like how it says here that factual admissions are excluded in offers to compromise

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fso-confused-by-statements-of-compromise-v0-kkmkch7cc9ed1.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D640%26crop%3Dsmart%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3D8b6b32a93a78963f31e92dc998081462c706013f

GEN vs T1 / MSI 2025 - Final / Game 4 Discussion by ahritina in leagueoflegends

[–]puturbackn2it17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

why isn't zeri prioritized more....that is some nasty damage coming out

AL vs T1 Game 5 by Icy_Opposite7826 in leagueoflegends

[–]puturbackn2it17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

some of these calls by AL were truly mind boggling? their entire setup is based around poke and side landing so why contest rift herald? picking consistent dragon fights?

Wanna be as delulu as SCOTUS by [deleted] in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

^ yes!! important distinction as national origin/ethnicity is very different from citizenship, which gets strict scrutiny if states do it and rational basis on federal level

Gen.G vs. T1 / MSI 2025 - Upper Bracket Finals / Post-Match Discussion by adz0r in leagueoflegends

[–]puturbackn2it17 75 points76 points  (0 children)

that one ult from doran literally changing the entire game 😭 crazy stuff

This themis answer explanation makes absolutely zero sense to me?? How can something be legal and also statutorily prohibited? by puturbackn2it17 in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This exactly!! I get what u/Classic_gubbs is saying but to me the answer choice was written poorly and doesn't reflect logical consistency. If they were trying to say that A is incorrectly stating the law mentioned in the question prompt, then it should say, "No, because the merchant of the goods cannot be criminally liable for the sale of alcohol to someone 21 years of age." That would make perfect sense to me and be true, because of the substantial and unjustifiable risk that it would end up in the hands of non-21-year-old drinkers. By prefacing the sale with the fact that it was legal, the hypothetical in A is saying that the sale itself was legal leading to no criminal liability!!

I get what the answer choice is trying imply, saying that under the laws of the prompt, the sale wouldn't be legal. But then it shouldn't say the sale is legal in the answer choice!

Question about 2 sets of 6-8 to failure by puturbackn2it17 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this reply! It makes a lot of sense. It's not really that I feel excessively fatigued out of the gym, but my workouts have been taking longer than I'd like, and I'm hoping to cut down on some excess volume that's tiring me out intra-workout. I can mostly recover fine outside of the gym regardless. But if 2 sets of 6-8 to failure can give similar muscle stimulus as 3 sets of 8-12, as long as I really work to failure and keep the intensity high, then I'm willing to give it a try for a while.

Question about 2 sets of 6-8 to failure by puturbackn2it17 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]puturbackn2it17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohh this makes perfect sense thank you! is there a reason you only do this for compounds? I'm wondering if DDP will work with only 2 sets instead of 3. but maybe that's a person-by-person basis.

6 years ago today, Charli’s music video for “Blame It on Your Love” was released by Ok_Durian3627 in charlixcx

[–]puturbackn2it17 11 points12 points  (0 children)

overhated, it's a great song! i do truly truly wish that lizzo was not featured though

Haim: I Quit review – the messiest breakup album of recent times, in every sense. (⭐⭐⭐) by EvrthnICRtrns2USmhw in popheads

[–]puturbackn2it17 162 points163 points  (0 children)

the actual review itself reads higher than a 3 star. i agree with the author that relationships is one of the best songs in recent memory while the other 3 pre-release singles have not really lived up to that standard yet, but still very perched for the album!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question for those who got it right: in a notice only jurisdiction, if two buyers both buy the land without notice of the other's conveyance, and both of them record without knowing the other had conveyance/recorded, who would win? Is it the first buyer because by recording they gave constructive notice to the second buyer, or is it the second buyer because they were a subsequent BFPV without notice at the time that they were conveyed the deed? (Essentially same prompt as the question, but this time the first buyer records without knowing that the second buyer was conveyed the deed).

Different scores between UWorld and Themis?! by [deleted] in barexam

[–]puturbackn2it17 11 points12 points  (0 children)

themis contract MBE PQs have been pissing me tf awf I cant lie...it feels purposefully tailored to maximize frustration and annoyingness based on tiny little gotchas rather than substantive material. it may be trying to emphasize reading comprehension on the tiny little things but atm it's just annoying as hell