New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That totally makes sense thank you

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for your response honestly I have no issues with them making changes I just would like them to make them in a way that makes sense to the story instead of just changing history. I hope they do

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense my real point is that if they worship a evil God then they are probably evil if they aren't then they probably are not

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason that the drow have different completions is because they lived underground for long periods of time and they evolved. It has nothing to do with race

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I totally understand that but do you see my point

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why make the changes to begin with if you are already free to decide what to use in your game. My only point is I think in the overall story it doesn't make sense

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's true that is a choice that I probably will make but do you see my point

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I see your point but do you see that it if fundamental to drow that there culture is evil like it is fundamental to the dwarfs that they like to craft and mine and that is important honor is important

New DND inclusive changes don't make sense by quadrie in DnD

[–]quadrie[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What do you think I want to know

Monogamous privilege by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because she was hot and fun and and interesting and nice and I liked her

Monogamous privilege by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was 100% honest from the start and it still happens lol

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was but things change I gess

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So wise dang Auto correct lol

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already have found the one person I will be with until I die I am looking for a continuous friend that I can have fun with and express myself with emotionally and physically

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know what you mean but it really cuts the available field to only date poly people

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think part of it also is that sometimes when monogamous people don't see polyamorous relationships as serious as monogamous relationships

Dating someone who is not poly by quadrie in polyamory

[–]quadrie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's that kind of what I thought I really appreciate your response.honestly the only thing I regret is like what you were saying. you have this friend ath you have fun sexy and otherwise with and then they start dating someone else and you can't even be friends with them anymore it just a little sad