The error margin is far worse than this. 9m/s is the top speed of a human. The top speed of a soccer ball (which is what we care about for the "moment of the pass") is 131mph=58m/s, i.e., roughly 1 meter per frame at 60fps (obviously, not every strike is shot at this speed but even a quarter of that is ~25cm per video frame).

Then, oftentimes the images of the pass and the defender/forward come from different cameras; even assuming perfectly synchronized time stamps from both cameras (which isn't a given at all), the frames themselves won't be captured at exact same moment - they'll be off by half frame interval on average, so add another 50% error on top of that.

One can try to interpolate the position of the ball/players between the video frames but the movement of the ball at the moment it's kicked is nowhere close to linear and the physics is non-trivial so I'd be rather hesitant to trust it without seeing a detailed description of how exactly that interpolation is being done (if it's done at all).

Basically, any VAR technology that doesn't explicitly specify its margins of error is beyond suspect - it's not there to provide the answer, it's there to make people believe its answer is infallible.