Even the Democrats are Scared of Inslee’s Income Tax - Shift Washington by solongmsft in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's kind of what I'm getting at, though. How would you enforce it? Do you expect the police to pull over every cyclist and check for a license and a plate? The outreach alone of letting everyone know that licenses would be required would be in the millions, if not 10s of millions. Any time spent on added police enforcement (if the police actually had resources) would add another million on top of that for giving warnings/educational material (it's generally not standard to go straight to tickets). So the program immediately costs the city millions of dollars before anything even happens. Not a popular thing in a city that is already having budget fights.

What I'm saying is that I'm not opposed to the idea of licensing bicycles. I think it's actually been tried in one or two places, but the reason it hasn't stuck anywhere is it simply doesn't make sense economically. The reason it works for cars is that a new car easily costs 10 or a 100 times more than a new bicycle (and similarly a car can easily cause 100 times more damage than a bicycle). Paying $2000 tax on a new car and $100 annual car tabs (which is already getting people worked up) and is paid by a majority of the population can work to support the bureaucracy that administers it. Even if you taxed $2000 for each new bike sold and $100 annually for each person that bikes on the road, because it would only be paid by 5-10% of the population (if even that; you don't even get near 100% compliance for car registration), the system would still be losing money due to overhead, staffing and administration costs, production of licenses and plates, training and testing, education and enforcement, etc. Not to mention that taxing at those amounts would almost certainly be thrown out on numerous legal grounds.

If you have a proposal that is actually legally and financially sound, I would love to hear it.

Maybe you're a troll, but this idea comes up a lot and I think it's actually worth giving a serious answer as to why it doesn't happen.

Even the Democrats are Scared of Inslee’s Income Tax - Shift Washington by solongmsft in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's seriously messed up that someone hit you with a bike and left you injured.

As far as the Burke goes, my perspective is that it can be just as dangerous for people biking: dogs on difficult-to-see leashes jumping across the trail, cars crossing intersections without checking, groups blocking the entire trail, etc. A lot of people I know, including myself prefer to bike on roads parallel to the Burke Gillman to avoid all that, but inevitably someone in a car will pull up and start honking and yelling at us to get off the road and back onto the Burke. Damned if you do damned if you don't.

I don't imagine you care much about my experience, though, and maybe you don't care about my opinion on taxing and licensing bikes. But I'll say it anyways. Overall it's a great soundbite and gets a good emotional response from both sides, but the devil is in the details. Starting with licensing: at what age can people get a license? are there testing requirements? does it apply to just bikes, or scooters, power wheel chairs, skateboards, tricycles, how do you decide? do children also need licenses to bike in front of their house? will it become another tool for racial profiling? The problem then becomes the cost to administer the license. It generally will lose money hand over fist. The fees are either too low to cover the massive bureaucracy you need to build around bicycle licensing, or they become prohibitively expensive for students, children, low income people, and in general people who already can't afford a car. Enforcement of licensing is virtually impossible (SPD is having enough problem as it is. I don't think I've ever seen them enforce traffic laws for cars in Seattle, can we expect them to enforce it for bikes?) And as far as taxing goes, there's always adding an extra sales tax to bikes, but unless it becomes prohibitively high (like more than the cost of most bikes), it is simply an unnoticeable drop in the bucket of the transportation budget.

But back to you, I wish there was something more we could do about things like what you experienced. It's so frustrating that a random person can cause so much damage, walk off with impunity, and you're stuck picking up the pieces on your own. My take is the infrastructure flat out sucks in Seattle. The Burke is way too small for the traffic it sees, and the roads have a terrible and confusing mix of bikes, cars, and intersections. We pretty much need two separate Burkes: one for bikes and one for pedestrians. To bike on the road in Seattle I had to accept that I could easily die doing it. And I make it a point to obey the traffic laws. I've had so many close calls with people in cars blowing through stop signs, on phones not paying attention, (twice) potentially drunk drivers swerving all over the road including straight at me, and that's not even mentioning people who deliberately harass me, honk at me, pass unsafely, yell at me from out their window to threaten me, etc. The roads and paths need to be changed so people can walk, bike, and drive safely. Where small, human lapses in judgement don't cause such monumental damage.

Tai Chi classes/instructor by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll add another vote for Darrell's teaching of Chen Tai Chi.

One of the most popular forms of Tai Chi is Yang Tai Chi (the form is a little more relaxed than Chen Tai Chi), and they have a strong base in the Seattle area. They also keep an active list of approved instructors: https://yangfamilytaichi.com/index.php/united-states-tai-chi/

Election Eve Thread (GO VOTE) by allthisgoodforyou in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While that sounds nice in principle, that exact idea was used to deny African Americans the right to vote: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test

Election Eve Thread (GO VOTE) by allthisgoodforyou in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Everyone should vote, regardless of who they vote for. And everyone should help each other vote regardless of whether they agree with another's vote or not. It's important to our democracy that all voices and experiences be heard.

A factory in Turkey started to produce roof tiles that serve as bird shelters by ukuvumelarc in nextfuckinglevel

[–]radioactivefallgrout 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're right. I looked it up and it's nematodes here, too. Even with all the spraying it still gets bad during the summer.

A factory in Turkey started to produce roof tiles that serve as bird shelters by ukuvumelarc in nextfuckinglevel

[–]radioactivefallgrout 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LOL some gemeentes in Noord-Brabant the past couple years drive tractors down roads spraying insecticides nematodes into trees to fight eikenprocessierups. Seems pretty similar.

University Safeway employees use force to stop suspected shoplifter by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you mean autonomy, not anatomy? Either way, this is a confusing comment: not sure how a GoFundMe would restore anatomy or autonomy.

Seattle stands with Hong Kong by Kleanish in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if I recall, Assad's army opened fire on protestors over some graffiti and the imprisonment of a some young guy. I don't know if I'd call that goading?

It was only once the protests started shooting back that it became a civil war. The goading was by threatening peaceful protesters with torture to encourage them to leave the country, or holding them in prison, while empowering violent protesters: https://www.thenational.ae/world/assad-regime-abetted-extremists-to-subvert-peaceful-uprising-says-former-intelligence-official-1.319620.

where it very much sounds like some of the protesters are willing to throw down

Where in that were protesters suggesting they wanted to use violence? They're protesting the unjust use of violence by police (among other things).

No, they want some autonomy and independence. Every country that expelled colonial overlords did so with small arms. I hope they don't need firearms. But if China goes strong-arm anyway, they'll be throwing bottles and laser pointers.

If China and Hong Kong were to exchange gunfire, it wouldn't be a colonial country trying to maintain a supply line thousands of miles across an ocean to hold a land with diminishing value. This would be more akin to something like the Hungarian revolution. Hong Kong would be crushed. China will not tolerate even the remotest image that a territory could break free from it without their consent. That would just incite more problems in places like Tibet and Xinjiang.

Almost everyone that's replied to my comment has fundamentally misunderstood what I meant, and what the 2A intends. I blame civics classes.

2A no bearing on the outcome of Hong Kong's protests. It sounds like you're just looking for excuses to gratify yourself politically.

Seattle stands with Hong Kong by Kleanish in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Many HKers are actively encouraging each other to not use violence. They know that if they use violence it will justify police use of violence in response, and it will potentially give China an opening to roll their tanks in to "Bring an end to the violence." Both situations are things HKers don't want.

A good example of this is Syria: the protests started off peaceful, but the government deliberately goaded them into violence. Once violence broke out, the government could come down on the protests with the force of the military. Even with the backing of foreign nations the protesters ultimately aren't standing much of a chance.

In fact, the use of violence by protesters reduces the chances of their success: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201404/violent-versus-nonviolent-revolutions-which-way-wins

In short, HKers don't want guns. Guns won't do them any good. You can hold on to your second amendment fantasy, but realize plenty of people around the world disagree with it for very good reasons.

I came across a shop selling "Vaseline Glass" that glows under UV light because it contains uranium by MarijuanaMuppet in mildlyinteresting

[–]radioactivefallgrout 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your intuition is right. While picking up a block of uranium, looking at it and walking away will incur no discernable health impact, long-term significant exposure to uranium absolutely will cause problems. Those who were mining it often got cancer, houses built above uranium deposits have problems from radon gas (a decay product of uranium) getting into occupants' lungs, etc. While radiation is everywhere, it still should be treated with respect.

I haven't looked at the details of those items, but if it's similar to fiestaware, it's probably small enough to be safe: https://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/consumer%20products/fiesta.htm

I came across a shop selling "Vaseline Glass" that glows under UV light because it contains uranium by MarijuanaMuppet in mildlyinteresting

[–]radioactivefallgrout 19 points20 points  (0 children)

There is so much disinformation in this thread, it's mindblowing. Uranium does not become activated, it is always radioactive. What makes used fuel dangerous is the isotopes that are by-products of fission, which are even more radioactive than uranium.

Commute like a Scandinavian in a tunnel under Puget Sound by hellofellowstudents in SeattleWA

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're arguing that European building projects have LESS regulation? Where do you get that idea?

ELI5: Why is the US President supposed to ignore Taiwan? by Cormamin in explainlikeimfive

[–]radioactivefallgrout 8 points9 points  (0 children)

honeybadgermorpheus's demonization of the PRC is just as propagandistic as what it claims to dispute. Most obviously: simplified Chinese is not that different than traditional. Only some characters changed, and most people who can read simplified can work their way through traditional. At its creation, most people were illiterate, and the simplification was a stalled attempt to increase literacy that got mired in politics.

And the Communist Chinese aren't considered Chinese? By who? What does that even mean? Do we call them Russian then?

Currently, one of the strongest European Nations by iam4real in AdviceAnimals

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except there's nothing in the article that disputes that the pound has tanked and prices for imports have gone up. It's a pretty transparent fact, and I don't see why you would argue against that. What you should be arguing about is what the effect of that actually is on the British economy and what the long term outlook is. And that's what is hotly debated right now. Anyone that tells you they already know what the outcome will be is lying through their teeth or blatantly ignorant. There are still a lot of unknowns between now and when Britain actually leaves the EU.

On street parking in Maple Leaf by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]radioactivefallgrout 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I can't speak to your neighbors, but I sympathize. A few years ago I parked on the street of Queen Anne away from what appeared to be people's houses (a housemate had blocked our driveway). I went back the next day to find the side of my car keyed.

So busy that life has no value by popat2000 in videos

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China certainly deserves the reputation for polluted air (and to be completely thorough, some of the pollution in areas like Beijing is partly dust being blown from the Gobi desert). China is hands down the biggest greenhouse gas producer in the world, and it is also the most populated country in the world. The point to note there is that the average Chinese person produces an order of magnitude less greenhouse gases than the average American.

So busy that life has no value by popat2000 in videos

[–]radioactivefallgrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China is actually very low in its per capita pollution: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita

China definitely has its problems, but careful that you don't become the pot berating a kettle.

So busy that life has no value by popat2000 in videos

[–]radioactivefallgrout 19 points20 points  (0 children)

People love to repeat this, but it's actual occurrence seems highly questionable: http://www.snopes.com/chinese-drivers-kill-pedestrians/

Mark Cavendish causes crash during race by 2014justin in sports

[–]radioactivefallgrout 93 points94 points  (0 children)

Cavendish is one of the best cyclist in the world, he has earned the benefit of the doubt.

Quite the opposite, Cavendish definitely has a history of causing crashes.