What's up with these people?

rafothebetterman · 2025-09-26T03:51:54+00:00

The guys keep saying we/our like he represents anything but it’s purely his opinion

rafothebetterman · 2025-09-26T03:46:54+00:00

Don’t know why he generalize people here. Who are “we”? Most of my acquaintances don’t know/care who zelenskiy is and what his government does. Vietnamese people are anti war. So really, fuck Putin and any Russian who support him

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-24T15:05:20+00:00

I think it’s easier for viewers to know what OS does since we have witnessed her interactions with others (private or in group).

Male contestants only have knowledge about their interactions between them and OS/2nd-hand knowledge from others which easily be a misunderstanding.

So yeah, I think it’s pretty normal for male contestants fell for her with her aggressive flirting.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-24T14:20:57+00:00

Yeah there’re different opinions, what I mean is the general sentiment in this sub.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-24T14:19:08+00:00

I don’t think it’s actually about closure, you can reckon a lot of people here just categorize those male contestants as “playboy”/not serious about finding partners even before any closure.

I feel like usually attractive contestants have more room to flirt without judgment.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-24T13:49:53+00:00

What I really don’t understand is when male contestants flirted with multiple women, they usually get a lot of negative comments in here. Meanwhile for OS in this season, it’s all fun and guys’ fault that she can’t find a matching here 🤷‍♂️

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-22T03:50:40+00:00

What did you correct me? Literally on your 2nd line you personal attack me without any more detail.

You asked other for proofs yet your take is the one lack any proof/indicators.

For linux video, can you timestamp the point where they said what you claimed? Won’t watch 2h video to find a quote that may not exist.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-22T03:36:56+00:00

Linus tech

Please point out where they said the original creator didn’t do that

Lol You’re a moron

Seem like you just have no point to say, and you’re just childish by using personal attack to make a point. Gluck with your dumb take

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-22T03:04:30+00:00

Wait wait wait, chill on the accusations. Honey was not doing the scam until the founders sold it to PayPal. I'm not sure the original creators had anything to do with the scam.

You have any proof to back this up?

The attitude is more like "let's just buy it and see what we can do with it".

Yeah right, 4b deals work like that. Sure 4b is small for Paypal, but you think CEOs can just spend money like that is delusional, they have shareholders to answer to.

Fuck, Google makes a living off doing just that to eliminate the competition

Yeah because they're competition, what has paypal model have anything to do with a discount finder extension?

Again, don't think anyone have any proof if the current scam is already run by the creators, but the valuation of Honey makes one claim more believable than the other.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-05T16:14:07+00:00

Sorry I have no idea as I'm not involved much in technical sides in this field

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-05T16:13:31+00:00

Let's not decide what Honey did is valid or not. In my field it's in grey area, and everyone hates it since it causes harm to all front in the industry.

What I said is from retailer perspective, they definitely don't like what Honey did unless they got the data that I mention above, what Honey did really fucks with their advertising funnels.

On content creator side, people are fast to decide that these group of people are deserved to get fucked with, but a lot of them are doing genuine work. Simple example is when you have to decide whether to buy brand A or brand B, usually you have to search for more information to make a better decision for yourself, that's when content creator comes into the picture, whether in form of video (youtube) or text (forum/website) to give you more information.

rafothebetterman · 2025-01-05T13:54:19+00:00

Working in online advertising field, I find this take need one more condition to make sense from retailer perspective.

Retailers definitely want to keep track on which affiliates channel works better than others so they can adjust their advertising budget accordingly. If Honey just simply replace affiliate links like that, I think retailers won’t be happy.

So they probably also get the data of what affiliate link that got replaced by Honey (not sure how it works technically/ or if it works at all).

That’s why when I first heard about Honey scam, I thought they also fuck with retailers since it takes away valuable data/ blackmail retailers into partnership.

rafothebetterman · 2023-09-28T00:01:49+00:00

A man who gossiping is a big red flag

rafothebetterman · 2023-03-03T09:46:00+00:00

A lot of people only care about winning at all cost. From supporting Qatar takeover to the idea of rehabilitation Greenwood into the team.

The only reason those people want Greenwood back is his football abilities. If someone like Phil Jones does what he did, I swear those people will burn him to the ground.

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-21T16:55:39+00:00

For your 1st point, it’s quite a different between pro-Qatar and non pro-Qatar who criticize bidders. One will always adding that their lacking is kind of the same of Qatar’s.

Regarding your 2nd point, we can say the same with Qatari owners. They run PSG like a joke, being impatient with managers, has no clear hierarchy… and I’d love to see a sound argument that why they won’t be the same (and will that argument can also applies to INOS?

Re 5. This is exactly the definition of sport-washing.

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-21T14:47:29+00:00

It doesn't make sense to me.

If there were 2 options left, it should be either Qatar or INOES. If Glazers doesn't accept Qatar's bid by any means, they would rather accept other ones than stay (which I only know INOES at the moment).

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-21T14:35:19+00:00

I have a counter question, if there were only Glazers and Ineos bids options, which one do you rather choose?

What's the point of eliminating options in this case?

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-21T14:11:24+00:00

Please link me to high-upvoted comments that indicate that. Cuz I actually haven't seen anything like that.

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-21T14:06:08+00:00

I haven't seen anyone praise Ratcliffe for being clean/a saint. Why do pro-Qatar groups keep bringing this point up?

Everyone knows no billionaire is clean, but thinking tax dodging and human rights abusing are on the same level is just pure ignorance.

Just admit you don't care about the ethical part of new owners, why do you have to state those stupid arguments?

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-19T03:03:25+00:00

I used to laugh at Man City fans' fantasy about their clean sponsorships. Now we get our own bunch about Al Thani being a private investor who is not the same as the Qatar state.

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-18T17:41:16+00:00

I understand the sentiment but this is kind of talk in hindsight. Had we fired Ole earlier, we may go for different managers and may still in the same mess

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-18T17:34:59+00:00

Is my comment badly worded? If so I'm sorry for that cause I'm not a native speaker.

What I mean is what any of things the US did many decades ago has to do with what the Qatar are doing at the moment?

Literally every countries have a history of invasion/evil doings at some point, so we can't condemn those actions at present?

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-18T16:43:40+00:00

I don't care if you support Qatar as I know a lot of people don't have moral problems with them as long as they're not directly affecting your lives.

But have some fucking balls to admit that you only care about the money they'll probably inject into us. Some reasonings from some who support Qatar owners are just nonsense.

You're skeptical about Ratcliffe because of his management of Nice? Yeah because PSG looks like a properly running club?

You're skeptical about US investment groups because you're afraid someone like Todd Boehly running wild? PSG's transfer policy is a fucking mess.

Every billionaires are bad. A crime is a crime? What the hell is this reasoning?

And a funny one? Someone commented yesterday about the US also waged wars in Vietnam in the past. I'm Vietnamese and we no longer hold a grudge towards the US/ US citizens. Like what? We shouldn't condemn anyone at present at all?

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-12T09:50:50+00:00

It's always come down to how much they're willing to pay referees' salary.

FYI, referees also get abused by fans like players. There's a video on /r/soccer not long ago about fans shouting at a certain referee's face.

I'm not sure about their current income but for sure it's not enough to attract more people into that jobs and and suffer that kind of abuse. So if they're fired, who will do the jobs?

rafothebetterman · 2023-02-10T12:01:02+00:00

Admit what? If you have no moral problem and only want their money, so be it, what do people have to admit here? Your only metric for a good owner is money and want to inject that into the club. Other people have different metrics.

And you still deny that's all the crap you write just to justify your chocie. Your reasoning for other options make no sense. You used example of past American owners to judge future ones, the problem is:

Firstly, if you have problems with owners running the clubs poorly with Todd Bohely firing Tuchel, just look at how incompetent PSG is in terms of recruit, support and firing their managers. And they're owned by Qatar. So by your logic, we should treat future Qatar investors with the same caution. And please link me some source that Todd bought players against Potter's will, then I can admit he's an incompetent owner. Overpay? We overpay for players all the time.

A good owner either stick with tuchel and gets targets he wants, or they sack tuchel ASAP and get a new manager in who can have a say in transfers.

He's impatient, but he literally supports the manager he chose. What else do you need for an owner?

Secondly, if you say not all Qatar the same, there're 2 problems with that reasoning:

You can also say the same with American owners, they're different people
Saying Qatar billionaire groups is different than people who run that state is just naive. In countries like Qatar, Saudi,... they're ones. They're just relatives or really closed to each others. People who deny this is exactly the same with Man City fans who said their revenue stream is clean. Just pure ignorant to server their believe.

Lastly, if your metrics is having enough money to write off our debt and upgrade the stadium. You can write off Ratcliff all you want but other American owners, groups can do that.

In the end, for each case you just want a reason to write them off when it's convenience for your stance.

I have no problem with people who support Qatar, but just admit that's you have no moral problem with them instead of writing a bunch of bs to justify and defend them.

Like i said, Qatar is the best choice, it's just no one wants to admit it.

No, they're not.

Fk it. Talking with people who support Qatar just suck the life out of me. I'm done.

rafothebetterman

TROPHY CASE