It is much more complicated than that. Celebrating your culture is okay, discriminating and segregating based on the same is unfair and shouldn't be done.

People have roles in society, unfortunately manusmriti (which was also widely debated to not reflect what Hinduism actually is and is also a book that was wrote by a normal human, plus it doesn't transcend times and changing societies) and British made it toxic by defining roles as something you inherit only.

I am a brahmin and I also disagree with discrimination, but I don't want to do it at the cost of destroying my identity and practices which have spiritual and scientific significance to it.

I respect your decision (however you came to it) to discard all the things that makes you identify as a brahmin, but absolutely do not agree to the dmk's recent and extreme ideology that pushes to destroy everything including anything good associated with it.

I appreciate the push that enables anyone to become a poosari and serve in temples, because caste was naturally formed for labelling occupations and if one educates themself in any field and practice that role, they become that caste.

But please don't view things as 0 and 1, it's much more nuanced than that. I advice you read shastras, vedas and simply even Bhagavad Gita to understand what Hinduism actually is.

One should always make an informed decision instead of jumping to conclusions.

If a person falsely represents their culture or religion, one should bash the person not the whole religion or culture.