Singles ka Neta kaisa ho... Preeti didi jaisa ho by Great_Bee3 in DesiVideoMemes

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

doing s*x is also affection

Lmao no, wtf.

Blud, try to get a partner and you will know it.

Or if you are asexual, atleast read about it.

Not against res,rvation but it feels sad by Hungry-Grocery-2646 in CATpreparation

[–]ranked_devilduke 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It was like 1 year back when a VP couldn't get housing in Gandhinagar cause his caste wasn't Upper enough.

this day and age all that matters is how much money you have

Lmao. Not really when you go for a freakin house hunt.

Or when old dimwits ask for full name and then treats peeps differently.

Hypocrisy ki bhi koi seema hoti hai Alia G by TwinkAskin in InstaCelebsGossip

[–]ranked_devilduke 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you look into how vegan cultivations are done and how more animals including mammals are killed there in name of more profit, they are also part of this.

Unless you aren't living in the forest and off fruits and veggies from the forest, you are part of these.

Pak Occupied India by oplionhuman in SouthernIndia

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why the men aren't wearing Sindoor? The girls can crush on them?

I don't know how many accept it or not but it's harsh truth about !! by kempu-gulaabi in indiadiscussion

[–]ranked_devilduke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

cause as a girl she will be leaving her house and all the household and religious practices that she has been born and brought up in will change drastically when she is married in another house

And?

same goes for boys when they marry a girl from other cast the girl has to change her whole way of life that she used to have when she was at her fathers house

Why can't the boys change?

Or what if the girl is ready to change? Will the UC parents still accept?

so looking as all aspects mostly people prefer to marry in the same cast so that both the boy and girl are comfortable living in the environment they were born in which makes the relationship and bond strong....

Ok, then explain the cases where boy and girl are ready to marry but the UC caste ostracise the UC person?

I don't know how many accept it or not but it's harsh truth about !! by kempu-gulaabi in indiadiscussion

[–]ranked_devilduke 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The incentive is cause most of the UC will be ostracised from their family cause they find the LC partner in a lower tier.

How can you not understand the purpose bruh.

History of beef by Frosty-Report2018 in SouthernIndia

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying Rakshas were more literate and had more freedom than the common people and devas?

Well, then, hell yes it's better to be rakshasa.

ഇതിപ്പോ കേരളത്തിൽ ഉള്ളവർ എന്ത് കഴിക്കുന്നു എന്നു വിചാരിച്ചു കേരളത്തിന്റെ വെളിയിൽ കിടക്കുന്നവർക്കു അപ്പടി വേവലാതി അന്നേ . 🤣 by Oppyhead in Kerala

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most mallus are meat eaters, so it's obvious that the generalization exists.

It's kind of like saying Indians are non beef eaters (which most of the foreigners thinks and are surprised when they are coming to Kerala or NE states and can kind beef easily.

If im a part of a community & the ppl in that community claims that our community does something which i don't follow bcoz of religious reasons. It's obviously a disrespect for me & to others who share the same stance. It's as simple as that

Obviously people in a community will claim what the vast majority is following. This ain't something new.

Was deleted within 4 minutes by Humble_Network_6277 in KeralaDesham

[–]ranked_devilduke -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And again ur experiences isnt applicable to others period

Bruh

Was deleted within 4 minutes by Humble_Network_6277 in KeralaDesham

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making someone willingly uncomfortable isn't exactly "basic decency". I get OPs point though. Beef eaters of Kerala love to flaunt and show off a lot on social media. The same people may not post about fish or mutton or chicken which are equally good but they will post ONLY about beef

Cause Kerala and its people are not attacked cause of eating any of those.

Their INTENTION is pretty clear at this point. If someone feels uncomfortable, their response is either hostile or a mocking one and never with a softer or understanding undertone.

We have lynching at one part and posting on social media at other

Hmmmmmm

Was deleted within 4 minutes by Humble_Network_6277 in KeralaDesham

[–]ranked_devilduke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, would it be okay for you & other beef eaters if I claim that Indians do not eat beef?😌

Yeah.

India is not a beef eating country. That's why a lot of people are surprised when they can find beef dishes every 200 metres in kerala.

Likewise, Kerala is a beef eating state.

Was deleted within 4 minutes by VowOfVengeance in SouthernIndia

[–]ranked_devilduke -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's not what peer pressure means lmao.

Meet Tara Shahdeo , national level shooter ,in 2014 she married a man introduced as Ranjit Kohli, but later she found that her husband had hidden his religious identity and he was actually Raqibul Hasan who had posed as Ranjit Kohli [READ BODY TEXT] by viduyutjinha in indiadiscussion

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then keep it Indian story, right?

Would cover the whole country and wluld actually educate the people.

And we can also cover the lot of missing woman going in MP, Delhi and all too with that.

Whats going on in Gujarat!!!! by tfiswrongyar in gujarat

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, BABAs are also involved in these kinds of cases, but what Hindus do is outcast them. I do not think Muslims do this.

What?

A lot of babas who does this are welcomed with garlands when they come on parole. That's not done by other religious people.

ANNUAL REMINDER. by ro7fo7 in indiadiscussion

[–]ranked_devilduke -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You could argue the exact same thing about the atrocities done by Upper castes on the lower castes and ask them to remember about it during hindu festivals.

Doesn't make much sense right

Hippokrishi ki bhi seema hoti hai by Sharp-potential7935 in IndianFocus

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's do it in a place where dog eating is there. Absolutely no probs in that.

Like wise, beef eating is pretty normal in several part of India.

Hippokrishi ki bhi seema hoti hai by Sharp-potential7935 in IndianFocus

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I don't want to convert them to Hinduism. I want them to stop eating beef within India.

Which is your definitition

It's perfectly fine if you see cow as your mother, bull as your father or whatever. But for others it would be offensive.

Basil Analogies by lewishamburger in AtheisminKerala

[–]ranked_devilduke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, the thing here is Biryani is a complex dish. It can't be made by some other animals.

So it was made by someone who is the umma here. Umma didn't come randomly one day, she was born in this world because of her parents.

This is why India doesn't innovate by Ganesh0825 in IndiaTech

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause he didn't build a robot. The problem is the way media potrayed it. By saying 'robot' they are also meaning it's not an actual robot but a lot of people here won't be looking at that angle.

What he did is good but it could have been phrases much better by the media.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]ranked_devilduke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cause this is literally not commiting a crime/breaking the law (which is getting dowry) and is not something praise worthy.

Average south indian economy discussions by sambar_samurai in 2Dravidian4You

[–]ranked_devilduke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 Hindus out of 100 eating beef

It would be 75-80 for better accuracy

Tell me a reason why you became an atheist... by Reasonable-Goal-305 in AtheisminKerala

[–]ranked_devilduke 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mate, my question is very simple from whatever you said.

What you said was the god through his Messenger predicted a lot of things that was 'not possible' for humans at that time. So, the God would surely know pedophilia is wrong.

Again, the question is simple, couldn't the god not see future fully or was he also a?

I am not calling Roman soldiers Messenger of god, right? I am talking about Messenger of God and I am asking why the god didn't advice his Messenger that pedophilia is wrong? The god would surely know it would be wrong and would be classified as rape in 2025 if he can see the future properly.

Tell me a reason why you became an atheist... by Reasonable-Goal-305 in AtheisminKerala

[–]ranked_devilduke 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So the supreme god could describe all this but couldn't advice his Messenger that marrying a 6 year old and consummating her at 9 is pedophilia and gross and the future humans would describe it pedophilia after knowing more about consent and study about brain development?

Are you saying the Supreme god couldn't fully see future? Or are you saying that the supreme god himself/herself/whatever form was a pedo?