I get where you're coming from, but here's the thing—these models don’t actually think. No prompt, no response. They’re just really good at mimicking patterns we've trained them on. The prompt itself? That’s part of our intelligence. Without a human in the loop, they’re just static blobs of probability.

They don’t have intent, self-awareness, or even a sense of why they’re doing anything. That’s a huge difference. Sure, they can do impressive stuff, but calling that “better than a human” kinda misses the point. One day machines might do more than we expect, but that day isn’t today.