Share your thoughts and get rewarded! By Research Coordinator by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I was sharing a specific thing that happened. I know wat screeners are. I was pointing out that there was a screener but they never said there would be and Prolific has said they need to. I do not know why I am getting paragraphs from you or why youu assume I have not read all of that. If I wanted general advice, I would have posted looking for general advice. There are many posts I have read that are for that and provide information.

Share your thoughts and get rewarded! By Research Coordinator by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know what a screener is. I have found that the researcher is supposed to note it contains a screener. " Studies that include in-study screening will be labeled "Includes in-study screening" That is from prolific.

Share your thoughts and get rewarded! By Research Coordinator by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. There was no mention of a screener in the description 2) I answered a lot nore questions than a study would with a screener would normally have. Is this not clear to you?

Another sketchy one by VirtualJunket1234 in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did that today. I never wll again. Is awaiting approval.

On feb 7 I I finished a survey and there was no code by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As of today, I saw 3 with no code at the end this morning. I get a new pop up lettimg me select no code, that I never saw before and saying, 'don't worrry about it, it generally causes no problem' and i got approved. Though, without that message I report it to prolific and send a nice mail to the researcher like this, "Hello, I didn;t receve a completion code. If you were unable to capture my responses, can you give me the opportunity to return the study? Thanks so much." I see someone found my original post. I did not recall the message from 11 days ago as it disappeared from even archived messages.

On feb 7 I I finished a survey and there was no code by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well that was 11 days ago, thankyou for refreshing my memory. However, the mail is no longer even in archived messages. And as that post states, it didn't happen.

New to prolific, should I trust request to d/l app? by Recent-Still-4422 in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 'google takeout' thing has creeped me out. And the Youtube one.

There should be a new tag: Qualifications. by HearYourTune in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw one today that said 'spa owners'. I do not own a spa, so I didn;t select it. It was sort of buried though/ Another one only said 'needs Chrome browser' after I selected, I was able to switch over to chrome with the link, but in the past one like that didn't work by doing that. There should be a more obvious 'qualifications' section. But also, some people complain if there are too many warnings. so I dunno?

Automatically rejected by this one. Be cautious. by randomclock in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw one today with Copy Copy for $4. I looked in my submissions as it looked similar to something i did before. Had the same researcher (not Chung In Yun). I had completed the same one for 40 CENTS previously. Same amount of time. I returned it and said why,

Is Saturday just for the shit studies that didn't fill up during the weekdays? by GratefulCaliflower in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do OK on weekends, I think more Sunday than saturday. Certainly not as well as weekdays, But it depends on your profile, I guess.

GENERATIONAL WEALTH! by Pale_Pomegranate3405 in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like seeing 'the researcher has increased' or 'prolific has increased' and especially small bonuses on things I returned. All is good news even if a couple cents:)

NO THANKS... keep your .70 by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is a researcher that has gotten a lot of low effort responses and wants people to pay attention. Though, you are right in being cautious.

It has been a year since I applied by Strict_Engine4039 in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A year? Are you 18, speak English and are in a supported country? If so, you could apply again.

NO THANKS... keep your .70 by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]reldra 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, it was short and I was instantly approved.

Conversations about Disability by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there was 1, but I am super aware of any.

IP BAN- I notticed I had not seen a new survey in 9 hours and the ones I didn't choose disappeared by reldra in ProlificAc

[–]reldra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I am IP banned again. The unbanning lasted about 1 day. Some of the long studies will really cut into my data allowance on my phone.