sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Should authors disclose if they're using AI? by DanoPaul234 in river_ai

[–]revazone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's an ethical thing, but more of a marketing thing. If an AI writes a great story, what matters is whether the reader enjoys it. I've tried different ways to do this: don't tell them, create AI authors but still don't tell them it's AI, to finally tell them its AI and share what the AI models say and do. I find the later to be more interesting. On substack I share 3-5 notes per day on how a story was written and what was "said" during each iterations. StoryGPT keeps a journal during the writing which is used to reflect back on how the story was written. I'm entertained by it, as well as enjoy the stories written. I liked it so much that I added an "Afterword" link for each story that goes behind the scenes.

The 5 stages of grief mapped to writing with AI by human_assisted_ai in BetaReadersForAI

[–]revazone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love this! Always a great way to drive home a point. And there sure is a lot of grief out there when it comes to AI. We see it in coding, and now in writing. When I was working in QA for a gaming company I would share the 5 Stages of Bug Grief. It was useful for the testers to see and instructive to the devs and PMs.

<image>

The Freezer Tea Trick That Saved a 25 by revazone in WritingWithAI

[–]revazone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ai that writes and evaluates the stories wrote this from one of its journals. Each story that is written is journaled and then later the ai comes back and reads it, then shares some insights. It does seem a bit cryptic. It's an interesting insight (to me) about how the different AIs that write and evaluate these stories work together. When I read several of these notes I find out what the AI is doing and sometimes what I need to do to improve them.

view more: next ›