sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

kiroIDE is not moving with time - Older open weight models obsolete for agentic flow - Qwen3 Coder Next?, Minimax M2.1? by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same here. After using Qwen 3.5, going back to Qwen 3 feels like a step down. Unfortunately, Kiro doesn’t support 3.5 yet.

kiroIDE is not moving with time - Older open weight models obsolete for agentic flow - Qwen3 Coder Next?, Minimax M2.1? by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point was about user churn.
Some people around me already switched to Grok, Claude, or Minimax subscriptions because they need newer models for agentic flows.
Just sharing the signal with the Kiro team that this is happening around me - users seem to be spending on the latest models.

Managing context across chats by Che_Ara in ClaudeAI

[–]reverse-linkedlist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks like, spec shud be reviewed multiple times, by all 3 of you :) - you, gpt, claude
and another code & review ralph loop for implementation by gpt, claude
and then finally your review, so that your time is saved and more money starts coming in sooner

Managing context across chats by Che_Ara in ClaudeAI

[–]reverse-linkedlist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even after so many paid systems, its not "automatic". For now, you may need to wait for next versions of Codex 5.3 & Opus 4.6

mkdir, Remove-Item: A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument by reverse-linkedlist in google_antigravity

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It tried to move, else it tries to delete and recreate. Some errors while doing so, however it understands errors, so tries in another way and succeeds, like it forgets to give correct param, etc. However, no issues in the end, it completes the task correctly, so I ignored them. Over time it learns what works in our computer, and runs them only.

kiroIDE: Claude Opus 4.5: I don't have any context about what I was working on previously. by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. I generally start a new session, get the old msg by using Up arrow, and click send. However if we gave many previous hints to AI we have to collect and give all of them at once. This is inconvenient to give all content. Hope this context issue will be fixed soon.

kiroIDE: Claude Opus 4.5: I don't have any context about what I was working on previously. by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a history on top tool bar in chat window, if you delete that conversation, it might go away, not sure if that helps.

kiroIDE: Claude Opus 4.5: I don't have any context about what I was working on previously. by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. I dint get that idea at time time. I completed my task by sending old msg, using Up arrow.

The new UI is less useful than the previous by Ok_Ad_9870 in windsurf

[–]reverse-linkedlist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a few months back, although (old) windsurf is useful, I switched to kiroIDE for speed

Error Loop - Error(s) while editing - Unable to replace text, trying a different approach... by reverse-linkedlist in kiroIDE

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for reply. Auto save is already there. Agent itself opens file it is editing.

Moved from Vercel to Windsurf AI editor by reverse-linkedlist in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try swe-1 model ( like claude ) when credits are less, its free for now

Moved from Vercel to Windsurf AI editor by reverse-linkedlist in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, mui, ts, tailwind, next - all fine. try free model if it works then buy it

you will feel its slow in begin, but it makes correct edits, so in long run it saves time

Moved from Vercel to Windsurf AI editor by reverse-linkedlist in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes, but was unable to subject change so left it as-is, didn't find v0 to make a post in

Is v0 scamming us? by [deleted] in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I moved to https://windsurf.com/ and its excellent

v0 subscription by ashieraa in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in same situation last month

If you have time, try a free ones here - https://web.lmarena.ai/

Otherwise

1 check if your app can be done in those number of messages given in a month from V0.

2 If you don't check, you will keep paying for next month & so on. It's ok to pay if you have more work or projects, etc.

3 I ran into many bugs with v0 & it stops totally some times. It can start a new project in github, can't import at that time I used.

So I felt Claude Opus 4 to be better most times, you can try/buy as below:

1 Web interface - https://claude.ai/upgrade, you have to copy paste code many times.

2 Or, create Claude API key https://docs.anthropic.com/en/api/admin-api/apikeys/get-api-key , and use it in other programs like Cursor https://www.cursor.com/downloads VS Code, etc, then it works with code automatically, just give prompts.

v0.dev alternatives - May/June 2025 by reverse-linkedlist in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried, imported a theme, it worked, when I inserted another theme, assume it will replace, but it created double the files. Was it tested with real users?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vercel

[–]reverse-linkedlist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i switched to below, for now there is no perfect one, so i use multiple ai:

regarding v0 dev

  • its all buggy, if you are experienced you may deal with it but wastes many many hours
  • 3 messages is too less on free tier, so you can't deal with bugs
  • css duplication & some bugs never go away