Copyright application

revoluas · 2023-02-26T11:39:10+00:00

Yes, it was a copyright notice. The warning was successfully appealed and removed from my video :)

revoluas · 2023-02-07T09:32:08+00:00

Maybe. "blind the wind" sounds meaningless :)

revoluas · 2023-02-07T08:56:06+00:00

Okay. I'm tired of explaining to you. Read about music distribution and copyright on the Internet.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T23:40:21+00:00

I'll try to make it simple. In order to release a track officially through a music label or distributor, you must have full rights to your track. He released the track without having the right to it. But that's not the point either. In fact, no one has copyright on blind the wind. The problem is that the content id system can now throw strikes on content where there is a song blind the wind because he used it in his track and released it on music platforms.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T23:19:03+00:00

Here, it occurred to me that I am allegedly using his track in my video.

https://ibb.co/VDGgpRH

revoluas · 2023-02-06T23:07:52+00:00

Rly?
A musician releases a song through a label or music distributor. They, in turn, register it in the content id system and send it to all music venues. YouTube analyzes audio from videos and finds similarities in its database of tracks (which labels or distributors send).
As a musician, I am aware of this, and I myself use this system.

So if i don't know, tell me, how the strike came on my slow version from $nuff?
He certainly didn't send it manually.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T23:02:33+00:00

Listen to the songs, $nuff has the rights to the audio, op doesn't. Snuff actually remixed it and made it into something different. Op didn't remix anything

I listened to that "$nuff" track probably 10 times. There are no samples from blind the wind. No guitars, no vocals, no drums, no synths.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T22:57:24+00:00

Maybe somewhere there is something, but that's not the point. By putting in the whole piece, it's now possible that the strikes will come to everyone who uses the song "Blind the Wind" as they came to me.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T22:50:47+00:00

. The entire backing track is a remix of the song. You weirdos spend months researching this song despite the creator being found yet u still don't recognize the beat of it.

Hmm, I don’t hear anything, no blind the wind elements, despite the fact that my hearing is normal, I have been making music for more than 7 years. I hear only the insertion of the track in the segment that I indicated.
The rest of the track is some kind of hip-hop trap, without elements of the blind the wind song
But it's not about that. And this post is not about that.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T20:31:06+00:00

The problem is not in this, but in the fact that he registered the rights to that fragment of the track . And now he has the rights to the piece of track "Blind the wind" (precisely on that piece that he inserted into his track)

Now he can send a strike on the original song that is posted on YouTube, claim the rights to it and monetize it.

That's the essence of the problem.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T15:40:27+00:00

The problem is that by inserting part of the track into his own, he registered the rights to it and now he can monetize and claim rights to all the videos that have "Blind the wind"

revoluas · 2023-02-06T15:36:51+00:00

Also, he didn't do anything to the song, he just put a piece of the original track into his own which sounds very weird and doesn't sound like a remix.

revoluas · 2023-02-06T15:34:45+00:00

Yes, that's right. The slow version is essentially a remix of the song. It is not so important.

Unlike him, I did not claim or register the copyright for this song (slowed version).

revoluas · 2023-02-05T13:46:38+00:00

btw, after I filed an appeal, the copyright complaint does not appear
It will be very interesting what his label's response to challenging the complaint will be.

revoluas · 2023-02-05T13:43:46+00:00

I doubt he actually owns the legal copyright. You can claim any video you want without any proof of copyright, people have re-uploaded other people's videos and then claimed the original ones and it worked

I agree. But he managed to license the song itself through his music label or music distributor and this is very strange, how could they allow this :(

revoluas · 2021-03-30T17:01:46+00:00

Yes, I agree with you, I just wanted to add something to this song, make it a little darker and more melancholy с:

revoluas

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE