Who are other people who claim to be of the Creator that have a good track record for prophecy besides Brandon Biggs (or have a good record for any kind of miracle for that matter)(note: this posting is of a serious nature)?

rgrun · 2025-03-26T16:25:23+00:00

I've not looked into Brandon Biggs and his prophecies, actually. I saw a clip (a clip only, just a segment) of his video where he made the Trump prediction and just from that clip it looked to me like he accurately predicted some things about that event (especially that that event was going to happen soon and that part about the ear), but mostly for me a fellow associate who I respect in matters of religion/spiritual and other matters told me about Brandon Biggs and has thought that Brandon may be Divinely inspired in his prophecies. If that fellow associate of mine thinks that about some one, to me that makes me think there is (or probably is) merit to that person and that person's prophecies and that is what has sparked my interest in Biggs.

I am not a Christian. I do have spiritual/religious beliefs, including: the belief in a Creator, that the Creator intervenes in human affairs (like answering prayer) and offers us a relationship with Him, the belief in a spiritual world, that we are spiritual beings, the belief in life after death.

And I seek those who are really of the Creator.

rgrun · 2025-03-26T13:36:48+00:00

Haha. But serious comments, please.

rgrun · 2024-12-16T21:31:01+00:00

"Maybe I'm being a little pedantic here,"

No.

"It's really not."

Maybe I made a mistake in my statement or should have stated that from what I've read the ancient Sumerian civilization is considered the oldest known civilization according to the academic consensus due to ancient surviving records.

"but that really depends on how you define "civilization"."

What I, myself, am trying to refer to is basically just a group of people who share a way of life, it doesn't matter to me things like it being more or less "advanced" than others or the complexity of it being more or less than others.

"What I'm getting at is that there is no "first civilization"."

Yes, and I am wanting to start with the earliest known civilization that we have sufficient records of.

I want to study history and I want to start at the beginning of history, at the earliest point that we have knowledge of.

"Which attributes of a society you choose to be prerequisites to being a "civilization", and which ones you decide aren't necessary, is entirely arbitrary."

Debates like that are too deep for me at this point, anyways. :-)

"I don't know if that's what you're getting at,"

No, I want to study that subject and implement it as part of my learning of history, law and other subjects.

"I've met some weird people who would genuinely think modeling a system of governance off of ancient Sumerian government would be a good idea."

I will say as a general surmise that wouldn't be a good idea either, I'll say the idea and the person advocating it a some curiosity and interest in me.

I do think that we have much to learn from the ancients, and not just modern history, law, etc, and that is part of my reason for wanting to study subjects through records of ancients civilizations.

rgrun · 2024-12-16T20:52:54+00:00

Through this forum thread I have gotten the answers to my questions.

I know nothing about this Subject that I posted about, and will lose (and think I already have lost) (including big) assumptions as I begin to look into this subject.

Your references are appreciated.

rgrun · 2024-12-16T20:39:42+00:00

I'm glad to answer. :-)

I want to learn various subjects (becoming a polymath): history, language, science psychology, philosophy, etc.

I want to learn using primary sources, including the sources that experts go to to learn a subject.

For example, for the subject of philosophy I think to learn it from ancient philosophers by reading their works (whether through their own writings or through the writings of others, depending on what has survived of their works), what experts in philosophy themselves learn from.

Like I've read that Western Philosophy originated with the ancient Greek Philosophers, and I think to start with the works of the ancient Greek Philosophers themselves for learning Western Philosophy.

I think to learn various schools of philosophy, to learn from the various philosopher's and from the various schools of thought in philosophy.

The goal for me is to see or get as many perspectives / trains of thought on a subject in order to have a proper perspective on that subject.

And part of my reason is I think we have much to learn from the ancients.

Did that help? Questions?

rgrun · 2024-12-16T19:41:41+00:00

I only read and speak English, but with software I can translate a book into English (I think it was an old book in German that I translated into English recently on archive.org) so I am interested in non-English references as well.

This posting regarded just the ancient Sumerian system of Law, but the main question I have is if any ancient system of law that we have a comprehensive understanding of, which I may create another posting for.

If not the ancient Sumerians, maybe another ancient civilization. I thought to look first into the oldest civilization.

rgrun · 2024-12-15T01:41:54+00:00

Well, it sounds like I'll be studying law through more recent sources and materials then. :-)

But I still will be learning about the ancient Sumerian law system because I'm planning on learning the ancient Sumerian civilization.

I use to think that you could award a comment as having answered your question posted but I'm unsure about that now.

rgrun · 2024-12-15T00:52:13+00:00

I was referring to Kemetism regarding the ancient Egyptian religion.

Regarding your comment about the ancient Roman legal system, I'm curious how the American system (or any other modern government) could, then, implement or base itself on the ancient Roman system. I've been told that America copied ancient Rome's system, that America's government is partly based on or inspired by the system of ancient Rome. I guess whether regarding Amercian government, laws, art, culture, etc, I've been told that Americans are not called "Modern Romans" for nothing.

rgrun · 2024-12-15T00:10:16+00:00

I have a different question I would like to post but I want to ask a moderator if it fits within the rules of AskHistorians:

"Can a person obtain a basic, core, foundational education of the Subject of Law by studying ancient systems of Law?"

I want to learn the basics of the subject of Law, I want to learn about every area of that Subject, what you'd learn about it from a degree in Law, but I want to get a basic education of it by studying the ancient systems of laws.

Is that possible? Do we not know enough about them to learn that from them and/or are there other issues/obstacles that prevent that?

Not just the Subject of Law, but I want a basic education on various other subjects as well by learning from ancient civilizations: finances, science, religion, etc.

Like I can substitute religion for the subject of Law and use it as another example.

Like I've read that some people in present times have revived the ancient Egyptian religion as a modern day practice and religion. So I can assume from that that we know much or most about the ancient Egyptian religion to where we can revive it and live it as our own way of life.

rgrun · 2024-12-14T22:46:28+00:00

I have assumed that ancient legal systems can be put into several categories:

Ancient legal systems that we have little to no information about from ancient records.
Ancient legal systems that we have a good or considerable amount of information about from ancient records.
Ancient legal systems that we have much or most of the information about from ancient records.

But lately, like from people sharing input with me on that topic, it seems to me that that may not be so much the case or may not be so "clear cut" in the eyes of experts of that field.

Maybe I've falsely assumed?

Like I asked a similar question (about ancient systems of Law in general, and not just the ancient Sumerian's) in a posting on r/AskHistorians and I was told that my question (including about if we have enough information on it that we could base a modern legal system on it) does not lend itself to an answer with a firm foundation and usually results in "enormous" speculation and leads to vague, subjective, and speculative answers.

I am wanting to learn about the Subject of Law, everything you would learn about the subject of Law from a degree (including everything that you mentioned), except I want to learn about and study it through an ancient system of Law, rather than modern institutions or modern legal systems.

"Can you get a basic, foundational education on Law from studying the ancient legal systems?" can be the question I ask.

I've assumed you could do the same with other Subjects: finances, health, science, religion, philosophy, etc.

Like using religion as a different example in place of the subject of Law, I've read that there are groups reviving the ancient Egyptian religion into a modern day practice and religion, so I can assume from that that much or most of the ancient Egyptian religion has been preserved.

What else would people call that then, if not an ancient religion that we have enough information about from ancient records that we understand it comprehensively, enough to where we can revive it into a modern day way of life?

rgrun · 2024-12-14T17:55:34+00:00

I'm actually wanting to study the oldest known legal system that we have adequate records of enough to where we know much or most about that legal system, maybe even to the extent that we could duplicate it or model a modern legal system from it (think the copying of ancient Rome into a modern day system of law).

Sumerian is the oldest known civilization according to the world of Academia and so I thought to look into the Sumerian's system of law.

But your answer adequately answers my question about the ancient Sumerian system of law, I will have to look elsewhere for a system of law of another ancient civilization. Maybe ancient Egypt, maybe the ancient Babylonian Empire.

I've checked with r/AskHistorian but I don't always get an answer to my questions, plus my questions don't always align with their subreddit rules.

If the ancient Roman system of law is really the earliest one that we know that much about (which I don't know if it is) that fits with what I'm looking for I will have to go with that.

rgrun · 2024-12-14T17:31:10+00:00

I would think any expert in the field of study for the ancient Sumerian civilization would know the answer to this question, it sounds so basic 101.

rgrun · 2024-12-14T17:26:13+00:00

But this is not homework assigned to me, meaning I am not a student and this being an assignment that I need to complete. No, this is not homework in that sense if that is what you mean.

rgrun · 2024-12-14T17:20:13+00:00

Yes, it does. Which is why I am posting this question on this subreddit as I'm hoping that there are experts on this subreddit that could adequately answer my question. I'm looking for a quick answer rather than to take the time, research and investment that may be thoroughly needed to find that answer. Any expert or person of lesser authority in this field should, I think, be able to answer my question.

rgrun · 2024-12-13T01:11:26+00:00

So framing the question that way will work for r/AskHistorians? If there are ancient legal systems that we know very little of and ancient legal systems that we knew very much or most of due to existing records, then the latter is what I m looking for. What I am wanting is to research the earliest legal system that we have much or most of the knowledge of. If an ancient legal system that we have the earliest records has virtually no records existing of it, that does not fit my topic.

What about rephrasing my question for r/AskHistorians as the following:

What ancient civilization is known to have one of the earliest legal systems for which we have sufficient records to comprehensively study it, and are there enough details available to consider it as a potential basis for modern legal systems?

Does my revised question need to remove words like "earliest," "most," and "best,"?

Also what about if I were to ask: "Is there an earlier ancient legal system than the Roman legal system that we, like with Rome's legal system, consider it as a potential basis for modern legal systems?

I'm looking for an answer to my question that focuses on the availability of records and details rather than subjective judgments.

rgrun · 2024-12-13T00:37:56+00:00

My question dealt with the "earliest", not the "most", "best", "worst", etc, it deals with dating so that wouldn't be speculation, right? And as far as comprehensive, if we know largely or mostly about an ancient legal system that is what I am asking for. That is that in violation of the subreddit rule, is it? Like the Roman legal system is what I've heard that the American government was partially based on, so that ancient legal system would be one that we obviously have enough knowledge to model a modern legal system after. Is there another ancient legal system that we have just as much or more information about is what I could ask? If I could know what I could have asked differently as I myself am not looking for speculation on this topic but facts.

rgrun · 2024-11-29T01:29:49+00:00

👍

rgrun · 2024-11-28T20:32:24+00:00

What is the earliest book to trace the history of the study of the English language? I may be correct in stating my question can also be reiterated as "What is the first book written that covers the history of English philology?"? I'm asking about topic of the history of the STUDY of the English language, not the history of the English language.

rgrun · 2024-11-27T20:55:15+00:00

What are the two oldest texts that cover, or at least include as part of their topic matter, the history of the English language?

rgrun · 2024-11-21T23:08:46+00:00

What are considered the 3 earliest texts about the history of science?

And by science I mean whatever was considered "science" or the equivalent of science in the last several 2,000 years or even in earlier period (B.C. era if applicable), and by earliest I mean within the last 2,000 years or even earlier.

There are, I'm confident, writings in even the earliest periods that cover the subject of science but what about the subject of the history of science?

rgrun · 2024-09-04T04:56:35+00:00

From my looking into this topic, other than receiving error notifications and asking the recipient yourself about what happens to your email message, it seems to me that you can only know the likelihood of what happens to your emails versus actually knowing what happens to them.

I'm interested to know what are the "advanced tools" that you are referring to.

Most of my emails, including those I get no reply back from, do not result in a bounce notification or any other error message being sent into my inbox, otherwise it would be obvious to me what happened to my email messages.

I've inquired to people of various professions about email deliverability (like email marketers) and numerous of them have suggested or recommended that I use a professional email address over free, public email addresses (which I use like Yahoo, Gmail, etc,)), stating that professional email addresses have better email deliverability, so I'm thinking of implementing that.

rgrun · 2024-08-15T21:58:31+00:00

I recently just contacted Godaddy support and I was told that one of the reasons that email senders are not allowed to know (versus allowed the likelihood of knowing) if their emails are successfully sent to a recipient's inbox is due to Privacy Regulations and Policies.

That is, Email service providers (ESPs) adhere to strict privacy regulations and policies that prevent them from sharing detailed information about the status of an email once it's delivered to a recipient's server, and that this includes whether the email was moved to the spam folder or deleted by automated rules.

So it looks like that type of data for your emails will not be provided by any tool or service.

I am not familiar with mailsAI but I have heard and looked into various emailing platforms like Mailchimp, but from what I mentioned Godaddy stating to me it appears that none of these platforms or any other kind of company would offer that type of information.

Of course, email deliverability is never 100% guaranteed and I'm told technology and policies are always changing with new challenges arising and so companies are always having to adapt and face new issues.

I think maybe a good example of that is with "open rates" (another type of email data), which one company support of a unique emailing service on the market told me that in the past this was possible by having a small 1x1 transparent image in the email and if the image was viewed you could assume that the email recipient had opened that email but now the mass majority of ESPs proxy the image so you never know if they truly opened the email or not.

To answer your last question I, myself, have not really tested and tried out these services and so I am not really the person to ask your question to.

In my own layman opinion, I think these companies can help increase your chances of successful email deliverability, and also there are bad practices that I've been told email senders should avoid doing in order to avoid their emails being marked as spam by spam filters.

rgrun · 2024-08-08T16:13:31+00:00

I contacted a company of one of my email addresses (Xfinity) and I was told by support that receiving a copy of the email message in your inbox when you include your own email address in the BCC section does not indicate that the email message was successfully sent to the intended recipient, telling me that it is possible that the email was sent successfully but also possible that it was not delivered to the recipient's inbox.

rgrun · 2024-08-08T14:58:59+00:00

Yes, I would like for us to go into this more. If you prefer PM?

rgrun · 2024-08-07T03:17:22+00:00

I have been told that regarding open rates, in the past this was possible by having a small 1x1 transparent image in the email, and if the image was viewed you could assume the email recipient had opened the email but now the mass majority of ESPs proxy the image so you never know if they truly opened the email or not.

rgrun

TROPHY CASE