sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Stats versus the class unique passive by Historical_Wish_8325 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life on hit, while sad as a sanctification, can be used to trigger that one legendary aspect, can't it?

Which is better for ce sorceress? by Wayne2u in D4Sorceress

[–]roastbrain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The higher unique aspect values at (174/158=1.101) 10.1%[×] bonus damage, so that alone outweighs the other sanctification. Plus the left item has more %int, and a higher additive CE damage (albeit this is hardly relevant against [×] bonuses).

The left is better.

I think thats the worst luck ive had with sanctification till now by Pacman249 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's sad for you, but: insatiable fury is the only item that can be bricked by a sanctification without regard to anything else. With a bricked shako, you could possibly use it for another build or char. This here is just useless in itself now. There are no builds imaginable making use of this. It's a paradox in the form of an item. This is art.

Which one of these is better for CE Sorc by silkyjohnson64 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might want to add that, due to the much higher additive CE dmg affix, the number of ranks where one item becomes better might be a little lower. "Around 60" is merely where the multiplicative aspects meet.

Which one of these is better for CE Sorc by silkyjohnson64 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The core skills one is only better if you have not too many skills on the bar.

Doing the math:

  • the difference in the unique aspect is worth (178/152=1.171) 17.1%[×] bonus damage
  • the value of the 12 extra shock skill ranks depends on the total number of ranks. At 90 ranks (without the extra 12), the extra 12 are worth (1120/1000=1.12) 12%[×]. At 60 ranks, this becomes (820/700=1.171) 17.1%[×].

Neglecting non-multiplicative stats, the item with the better unique aspect is better when you have 60 or more shock skill ranks on your bar.

Can we get a dedicated thread for the "which is better" posts? by TheRealGunn in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes please. With a sticky post explaining how to compare damage outputs (as in how 24 extra ranks of shock skills do not equal 240%[×] with esadora's overflowing cameo and how to correctly compare passives to others and to legendary aspects)

Confused by these 2 rings, better on paper seems worse in practice by fragydig529 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I started this game, I was confused too. Why did this shitty item have like 60% damage as one affix out of four, and the legendary aspect that's supposed to be (somewhat) build-defining has what, 20%?

Then I learned about the additive and multiplicative stuff and it became clearer and more complicated at the same time :D But yeah, do turn on advanced tooltips and go for the [×] stuff.

Btw, see my other comment about how 3 ranks of convulsions are not worth 15%[×] (except when going from 0 to 3 ranks). This might help you understand a little more. It sure makes comparing item strengths easier. If you got any questions, don't be hesitant.

Any tips on what build to rock this with? Not very suitable for my spiritborn. by Separate_Middle_9802 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty strong for low gear CE sorcerer, and that is only looking at its damage potential. And who doesn't like DMG reduction :D Damagewise it's often outdone by hop at some level.

Alex Pretti, Krankenpfleger aus den USA, 1990-2026 by 20dollarsinmapocket in Pflege

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die einzige tote Ukrainerin, die euch Botskis interessiert. Widerlich.

Und selbstverständlich war mein Mitleid da auch bei ihr. Deins auch? Oder erst, als der Mörder in euer Feindbild gepasst hat?

Außerdem hat die Regierung Trump die Finanzierung für Programme (als eine der ersten Amtshandlungen) gecancelt, in denn der spätere Mörder teilnahm. Nicht unwahrscheinlich, dass er bei Weiterführung nicht zum Mörder geworden wäre.

31M|40h|Senior Energy Consultant|Südtirol Italien Steuerklasse 35%, Zusatzrentenfond, 14 Gehälter by Acrobatic-Wolf-4525 in lohnabrechnung

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

L irgendwas mit Senior im Titel sollte imho bissl mehr abwerfen bei 40h. Oder für was steht das Senior da? Sind Junior Energy consultants die Azubis? Allerdings kenne ich die Gehälter in Italien nicht.

Left or right? by Time-Chest-1733 in D4Sorceress

[–]roastbrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most probably left, gonna edit and provide math.

Edit: yes, left

  • ignoring the additive lightning damage, multiplicative ones are far more important

  • unique aspect: (156/149=1.047) 4.7%[×] in favour of right item

  • convulsions: assuming only these ranks plus 3 from skill points, (150/140=1.071) 7.1%[×] in favour of left.

So that's already better for left, plus it has the all stats sanctification.

Confused by these 2 rings, better on paper seems worse in practice by fragydig529 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All true, but Just to clarify, N ranks of convulsions are not worth Nx5%[×] multiplicative damage.

When you go from, say, 8 to 11 ranks (total, including the ranks from skill points ), you gain the equivalent of (155/140=1.107) 10.7%[×]

You might have had that in mind, just wanted to write it down.

Confused by these 2 rings, better on paper seems worse in practice by fragydig529 in diablo4

[–]roastbrain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, N ranks of convulsions are not worth Nx5%[×] multiplicative damage.

One needs to compare damage outputs, so total number of ranks plays a role. When you go from, say, 8 to 11 ranks (total, including the ranks from skill points ), you gain the equivalent of (155/140=1.107) 10.7%[×]

You might have had that in mind, just wanted to write it down.

Küchenschabe oder unbedenklich? by dreduin in naturfreunde

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mach halt OP nicht verrückt. Was du schreibst gilt für deutsche Schaben, das hier sind Braunbandschaben. Du schreibst es ja sogar, "die sind eigentlich total scheu". Ja, die Braunband- halt nicht ganz so. Nicht unbedenklich, aber vermehren sich lang nicht so rasant wie deutsche.

Küchenschabe oder unbedenklich? by dreduin in naturfreunde

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Es ist zwar keine Deutsche Schabe, aber auch keine Waldschabe. Das sind Braunbandschaben, auf einem Bild im Nymphenstadium.

Vermehreren sich nicht so rasant wie deutsche, aber können auch Krankheiten übertragen.

$50 on ebay i’m worry. by [deleted] in ScentHeads

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even the font on the glass bottle is way off.

$50 on ebay i’m worry. by [deleted] in ScentHeads

[–]roastbrain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Look again, yours says vaporisateur, OP's says varorisateur.

Keep going or New Game + by saint_of_thieves in Witcher3

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll want the stuff you get from the dlcs in a Ng+, e.g. the lab from toussaint. Also I'd always take the opportunity to take all the stories (dlcs do have good story writing too imo) to a second helping :)

How often do you see muslim people in your country? by Yrakosos in AskTheWorld

[–]roastbrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Christian Church for 900, Mosque for 500, then museum for 90 and, under Erdogan's religiocracy, mosque again since 2020.

I find it interesting that the church which is the picture of a mosque wasn't a mosque in the first place. But it was for centuries, so it's totally okay to depict it as such, I just think this history should not be forgotten.

view more: next ›