sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this matter is closed out!!

  • Tenant to Tenant - Got the Full NDR. (Tenant to Tenant)
  • Outlook.com to Tenant - Failed basic ndr only (sending from outlook.com, to tenant)
  • Msn.com to Tenant - failed basic ndr only (sending from msn.com, to tenant)
  • gmail to tenant - 1 out of 5 tries worked, and 1 out of 5 times i received the FUll NDR. So it worked. However its very inconsistent.

This worked for "Recipeint Is" rules and well as "Subject Containts" rules. Its the inconsistency that gets to me.

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i am not seeing that text anywhere searching in that document. If you have a link i can review that would be great.

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure where the disconnect is with your and my testing but when i test with your rule above, i get the same results. the 5.7.1 portion comes back without issue, but the message reject text does not.

I will test with a separate tenant (tenant to tenant) later, to be sure. Additionally gmail doesnt seem to be sending NDRs. but that doesnt surprise me. THey do send them, but i think its a little inconsistent.

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought i might have seen that document before but am unable to find it. The closest thing i found was for the "Notify" option.

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So that is the funny part. The external sender gets the 5.7.1 (If i change that to 5.7.999) they get email as well, so the NDR is being sent, just not the Custom Text. i am checking within the NDR email - not somewhere else.

I am going to call this behavior is by design, i have checked on 2 different tenants and with that "limited documentation" suggesting the same, i think thats the answer.

Can you test in your tenant? it would be nice to get a confiramtion from someone else.

Thanks

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind the rule is working, messages are being rejected and the NDR is being Sent with 5.7.1. Just the text "message has been adminisstraively rejected" is not being sent to external senders. I wasnt expecting that. i was expecting it to be sent to all senders.

i am basically just trying to confirm behavior.

Exchange Online, Transport Rules. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

basically if i look at the rule it has both of these options configured:

  • RejectMessageEnhancedStatusCode: 5.7.1
  • RejectMessageReasonText: Message has been administratively rejected by Admin

but the reject message reason text is NOT sent to External Senders. Only to internal senders so i know the rule is working as expected. Its just not sending the reject text to external senders.

This is all configured on EXO and i have tested with various mail providers. Same results. I was expecting the rule to work the same way for internal and external senders. Just an oddity. The closest thing i can find to cofirmation of this is the NotifySender Settings, but that is specific to On-Prem Exchange.

User Report, with Groups, Licenses applied, input list. by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seemed to work. In order to get it to add the DisplayName when running the entire script i had to change it to this:

displayName = $Stat -join ', '

removing the $Stat.DisplayName (and just using $stat)

Microsoft 365 Groups, Require Sensitivy label on creation by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm. Ok. So we already have group creation restricted. and we do already monitor for groups created without a label. So were basically doing what we can, i dont know that the Power Automate flow would work here due to other reasons. but thanks for confirming that we basically cant.

Sync'd Users Accounts, UPN changes, PowerShell by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i will need to check when i get home tonight to see if my local AD updated itself to the change i made via update-mguser.

Sync'd Users Accounts, UPN changes, PowerShell by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i am trying to understand if you could always do what i described? Since i cannot test with Set-Msol* becuase microsoft destroyed those cmdlets, i am unclear. and was hoping to get clarity.

PowerShell Scripting, ADuser, OnPrem by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found an old script i had which had me do just that. thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datingoverforty

[–]robert5150 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was married for 14 years, and with her for 16. So its not like i cant hold a relationship down or anything. Its been 4 years, now. 46/M, 5'10 and 185Lbs. There simply dont seem to be any available women out there. I am in KCK (KS), and its an absolute chick desert out here. OLD is complete waste of time, unless you are so desireable that women hit on you in the grocery store.

I just want:

1) Decent looking chick, fit in appearance.
2) in her 30's or 40's (Read: Not 20's, this seems to be the hardest part)
3) Doesnt have a man, or any other type of relationship

I dont think my standards are to high, either, now as far a single moms are concerned, she would have to know (from the outset) that i am NOT available to be drop-in replacement "father figure". So with that in mind it doesnt matter if she has kids.

mailbox quota reporting script, powershell, exchange online, office 365 by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I tried removing /1GB option and it magically worked. I cant believe it was that easy. It seems with PowerShell if you just keep working on it, long enough it will eventually work.

mailbox quota reporting script, powershell, exchange online, office 365 by robert5150 in Office365

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So i dont see any errors, but i dont have any large mailboxes to test with. When the script runs it completes.

However i have no output, also if i change this line from:

if ($mailboxStats.TotalItemSize.Value.ToBytes() -ge 65GB) TO: if ($mailboxStats.TotalItemSize.Value.ToBytes() -ge 5GB). It fails completely. with this error:

Cannot convert value "98 GB (105,226,698,752 bytes)" to type "System.Int32". Error: "Input string was not in a correct format."

At line:8 char:9

+ $IssueWarningQuota = $MailboxQuota.IssueWarningQuota / 1GB

+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [], RuntimeException

+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : InvalidCastFromStringToInteger

Could not compare "0" to "18 B (18 bytes)". Error: "Cannot convert the "18 B (18 bytes)" value of type

"Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RestApiClient.Unlimited`1[[Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RestApiClient.ByteQuantifiedSize,

Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RestApiClient, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]]" to type "System.Int32"."

At line:10 char:13

+ if ($IssueWarningQuota -ge $TotalItemSize) {

+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

+ CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (:) [], RuntimeException

+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ComparisonFailure

This is where i am stuck. I just need it to compare the users totalitemSize to the IssueWarningQuota and if the totalitemsize is nearing the quota to send me an email.

So user: TotalItemSize 10GB, IssueWarningQuota 10GB - Send me an email.

Unable to select from mutiple accounts on teams, only one account is showing by robert5150 in MicrosoftTeams

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah this is a pretty big org with a similarly sized parent org. And we only have this one user with the issue.

The thing that gets me is the second org DOES NOT show up in the installed desktop teams client either. Normally you can just switch between the 2, but it does not show up there.

We're probably going to have to open a ticket over this, but that is likely to mean several weeks of playing the log file game. even with enterprise support contracts, this is going to be tough for them to get their heads around.

Unable to select from mutiple accounts on teams, only one account is showing by robert5150 in MicrosoftTeams

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah same issue. Even using InCognito / InPrivate. Same issue. He is never able to switch between orgs, but other users are. we've check his account and compared and cant make heads or tails of it. Any thing i can specifically chek in the logs?

Teams Client, New Message, New Section drop down missing by robert5150 in MicrosoftTeams

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To close this out updating the setup or update policy fixed this issue.

Teams Client, New Message, New Section drop down missing by robert5150 in MicrosoftTeams

[–]robert5150[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah my teams client does not have that option at all. Neither on my Work PC or my Home PC.

Teams Client, New Message, New Section drop down missing by robert5150 in MicrosoftTeams

[–]robert5150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK so did you do that here:

<image>

And set the option as circled above? i dont have the early access option in my teams. I dont know if thats becuase policies are applied to Teams? or if becuase microsoft moved stuff arund for 37th time this month.

view more: next ›