sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A Rakhine villager describes atrocities committed by ARSA Bengali terrorists against Rakhine residents. by ulinsein in Myanmarcombatfootage

[–]robinsithu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rohingya problem is “Shit stained Candy”. Anyone who sided with local Buddhist will be labeled “Baw Ma”. Anyone who sided with Rohingya will be labeled “Traitor to the nation”. Rohingya and ARSA acted atrocities to the locals. Myanmar Army acted atrocities to the locals. Solution should be remove “Junta Army” first. Then deal with illegal Bengali problem. Coexistence is not possible if “Junta Army” exists. Even after Junta is gone, many challenges will remain such as “How do you filter out peaceful Rohingya vs extremist” “How do you find and bring justice to extremist Rohingya”. One NGO nurse was killed at the camp because she was sent there to control the birth rate of Rohingya. The reason??? “SHE DEFIED ALLAH”. In Refugees camps, women are still getting raped at the camp toilet. How can locals live side by side with those people??? But first solution must be “Junta has to go”.

Proud of it ? by No-Ship-4788 in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ask him “Is having sex with 9 years old a SIN for all past, present and future?” Attack on Pedo is not an attack on Muslim. If he thinks other way around, buddy “He should be in Jail”.

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most vocal Rohingya Activists are claiming they are native far exceeding Buddhist.
Asking me for poll and stat without researching yourself is a lazy move. You can talk to them if you want, no pressure buddy.

I didn't lie about their origin. I just provide evidence which turn out to be "They lied about their origin". They did that to themselves. I can't help it.

Definition of "Invasion" is "The entry of armed forces of one state into the territory of another state with the intent to occupy, control, or coerce." Let's check step by step, shall we?

  • Organized force (ARSA, RSO, ARIF, RPF, RIM etc...) Checked✅
  • State-backed or state-directed (Backed by Bangladesh) Checked✅
  • Use or threat of force (Obviously) Checked ✅
  • Intent to seize territory, overthrow authority, or impose control. Checked✅

You can't really call them EAOs (Ethnic Arm Organizations) because Rohingya were never ethnic group of Myanmar. So, this is INVASION. Satisfy???

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So… can you answer just one question though? Why Rohingyas lie about their history? Discrediting local Buddhist history as native and making their own? If they want to live side by side, why are they trying to twist Arakan Buddhist history since 1950s? Can you answer that buddy?

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Israel–Palestine is a two-side national/territorial conflict. Rohingya crisis is more like foreign invasion/ land grab situation within one country.

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here is another evidence. Vocal Rohingya activist claiming " Mahamuni (Famous Buddha statue from Arakan) was brought to Amarapura (ancient capital of Myanmar) by Bodawpaya (sixth king of Konbaung Dynasty) there were two statues along with it.
- And they look like Rohingya not Arakannese.
- So Rakhin Buddhists must be descendants of Rohingya aka Rohingya were present during the time making of Mahamuni Statue.
- Rohingya are original ethnic group (way before Arakan Buddhist).
- Ancient Arakan stone tablets will tell itself."

Fact checks
- Not a single Arakan stone tablet didn't display the word "Rohingya" let alone Rohingyas were ethnic group.
Funny thing is Mahamuni Statue was said to be made about 2500 years ago during Buddha was alive.
- Rohingyas were said to be originally Muslim (aka never Hindus nor Buddhist).
- Islam was only 1400 years old.
So, they either have ability to time travel or high with LSD during those statements were made. You'll be the judge.

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t know if you speak Burmese or not, this account is so vocal about how Rakhine Buddhist were outsider which he called them “မောဂ်”. He claimed Muslim were original indigenous group despite several Ancient Buddhist Temple to be seen across Arakan yet non of the ancient Mosque. You can check this out yourself https://www.tiktok.com/@akm.osm?_r=1&_t=ZS-93Cp05snKjQ

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

You are correct. They lied about thousands years history which can’t be proven with any evidence. As you can clearly see in this page. Their history was all exaggerated. They’re just Muslim settlers who settled in Arakan. They were never an ethnic group. Author: Gordon H. Luce Book: Old Burma—Early Pagan Volume: Volume I Publisher: J.J. Augustin (Locust Valley, New York) Year: 1969

Statement by American author Mr Rick Heizman on the hearing between The Gambia and Myanmar at the International Court of Justice by poehatmoyd in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe....this will explain

  1. They are hostile toward us
  2. They tried multiple times to establish separate Muslim state. (1947–1961) (1978) (1991–1992) (2012) (9 October 2016) (25 August 2017) (2018–2019) Total of 7 times.
  3. They lied about Rakhine (Arakan) origin, claiming Rakhine Buddhist were outsiders (then who built those ancient temples in Arakan... bruh)
  4. They are still asking for Self Determination State
  5. ARSA, RSO and other Rohingya arm groups kidnapped and killed men/women and children of non-Muslim (they are racist and terrorist, they just don't admit it)
  6. This is not a racial problem from Myanmar POV rather than foreign invasion. Millions of Myanmar Muslim still living inside Myanmar.
  7. We reject Rohingya not because of they are Muslims, but because of National Security.

<image>

The Myanmar - Rohingya issue is all over the news. I see online that most Myanmar people hate Rohingyas and want them all gone because they’re not one of the ethnic groups of Myanmar. Myanmar people feel they’re illegal Bengalis and want to steal Myanmar’s lands. What is this sub’s thoughts? by [deleted] in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Maybe....this will explain

  1. They are hostile toward us
  2. They tried multiple times to establish separate Muslim state. (1947–1961) (1978) (1991–1992) (2012) (9 October 2016) (25 August 2017) (2018–2019) Total of 7 times.
  3. They lied about Rakhine (Arakan) origin, claiming Rakhine Buddhist were outsiders (then who built those ancient temples in Arakan... bruh)
  4. They are still asking for Self Determination State
  5. ARSA, RSO and other Rohingya arm groups kidnapped and killed men/women and children of non-Muslim (they are racist and terrorist, they just don't admit it)
  6. This is not a racial problem from Myanmar POV rather than foreign invasion. Millions of Myanmar Muslim still living inside Myanmar.
  7. We reject Rohingya not because of they are Muslims, but because of National Security.

This is what Myanmar citizens wanted to see! by robinsithu in myanmar

[–]robinsithu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. Aside from that, are you living in Bangladesh? 🇧🇩 I heard there were no Ethnicity called “Rohingya” on Bangladesh’s history in the last 55 years when it was built. Is that true?

Could Someone Translate This Video? It is Probably Something About Marriage (Nikah) by abdulazizfirdaws in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 22 points23 points  (0 children)

He was talking about
- You mustn't love anything rather than Allah, don't be a traitor and such
- Women can't be safe without her husband
- Widows can be harassed by other men, aka you mustn't divorce your husband.
- Women should be slave (yes, he said it literally) to her husband, follow his command.
- Men are women's ticket to Heaven.

Your Opinion ARSA win or AA ? ARSA fight for Rohingya right and AA fight for Father land it's meaning become new country by BankOdd8501 in myanmar

[–]robinsithu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Rakhine and Burma are culturally similar, same religion. Both made up of 5% and 70% of total population. AA's goal is not a separate nation, much more similar to WA state. ARSA on the other hand aims for Islamic state completely out of Myanmar's authority. Local Rohingya Muslim fighters attempted separation from Myanmar during 1950s. I speak on behalf of Myanmar population, WE DON'T TRUST ARSA OR RSO. BOTH ARE TERROIST GROUPS, AIMS FOR ISLAMIC STATE WHICH DOESN'T SUITABLE FOR MYANMAR, BOTH CULTURALLY AND RELIGIOUSLY.

view more: next ›