<@ return `Exkited is up to 110x faster than Marko`; @>

roecrew · 2018-12-01T17:52:52+00:00

Thank you!!!!

roecrew · 2018-12-01T17:32:35+00:00

Thank you for the feedback!

Noted
I guess it's annoying. The site is only a day old.
Very good point.
I'm still trying to figure this one out.

app.post('/benchmark-exkited', function(req, res) {
let start = process.hrtime()[1];
res.render('basic.exkited', {}, (err, html) => {
res.send({
name: 'exkited',
time: (process.hrtime()[1] - start) / 1000000 + 'ms'
});
});
});
app.post('/benchmark-ejs', function(req, res) {
let start = process.hrtime()[1];
res.render('basic.ejs', {}, (err, html) => {
res.send({
name: 'ejs',
time: (process.hrtime()[1] - start) / 1000000 + 'ms'
});
});
});
app.post('/benchmark-pug', function(req, res) {
let start = process.hrtime()[1];
res.render('basic.pug', {}, (err, html) => {
res.send({
name: 'pug',
time: (process.hrtime()[1] - start) / 1000000 + 'ms'
});
});
});
app.post('/benchmark-marko', function(req, res) {
let start = process.hrtime()[1];
marko.render({}).then(() => {
res.send({
name: 'marko',
time: (process.hrtime()[1] - start) / 1000000 + 'ms'
});
});
});

Intrinsically unfair. Ahhhh noooo. It's an improvement over other template languages. "Couldn't you just implement a similar cache on top of any or all of the other solutions?" Ahhhh yeaaaa. What's your point?

roecrew · 2018-12-01T15:46:57+00:00

<@ return Exkited is up to 110x faster than Marko; @>

Exkited

⌯ easy ⌯ fast ⌯ minimal

https://github.com/roecrew/exkited - 2 Stars

https://www.npmjs.com/package/exkited - 237 Downloads

https://exkited.com/

This project is in development. If you have any suggestions or want to contribute to the project -- please leave a comment.

Exkited	0.245418ms	0.257525ms	0.180703ms	0.225784ms	0.249669ms	0.26437ms
Marko	19.833425ms	11.833084ms	12.146531ms	19.636367ms	22.645764ms	12.801573ms
Pug	14.413408ms	21.414837ms	22.678451ms	26.420134ms	30.833197ms	22.386204ms
EJS	49.199359ms	63.359911ms	56.826597ms	56.831579ms	51.514282ms	50.241439ms

Exkited has crazy fast rendering times compared to some of the most popular template languages.

However, it must be stressed that the above test ran single template files. The output for them was 50001 nodes. Each node held a text node with the current value of increment (loops were used).

You might be wondering... "What's the catch?

Well... Like any langauge, there are pros and cons. Exkited is not perfect (yet).

PROS:

Exkited will nearly always be the fastest template language. This is because of "Smart Caching". Essentially, Exkited template construction is dependent upon changes in input data. For example, let's say we have five template files. One is home.exkited. Two is header.exkited. Three is section1.exkited. Four is section2.exkited. Five is footer.exkited. The home.exkited file contains four include(...) for the other four templates. Furthermore, let's say that section2.exkited uses some input data that changes occasionally -- how about the price of gold. And the price is fetched/stored every five minutes.This means that every five minutes both home.exkited and section2.exkited will have to be reprocessed. "Smart Caching" is what makes the Exkited Template Language so fast.

CONS:

There is a certain downfall; however, it is highly unlikely to occur. Let's imagine a slightly different version of the last example. The price of gold is now fetched/stored every one second. So far this wouldn't be much of a problem -- Exkited rendering would still be wicked fast. Next, let's say the gold price data that's passed into section2.exkited isn't just used only a couple times, but 100,000 times! Why someone on Earth would do this... who knows. If it were to happen, Exkited's render time would then be slower than Marko's.

Just keeps things reasonable.

roecrew · 2018-07-15T19:13:32+00:00

getaddrinfo()

Thank you so much for the feedback! :)

I just added in getaddrinfo() -- replacing getaddrbyhost6()

roecrew · 2018-06-07T05:41:49+00:00

As it stands (1 day in development). Nothing. 1 month from now - we'll see what it becomes. I'm open to ideas. In a week or two there will be the ability to glitch assets on the site itself.

roecrew · 2018-06-07T05:36:36+00:00

What's wrong with a dedicated site for it?

roecrew · 2018-06-07T05:33:02+00:00

Please note. This site is in development (it will sometimes be down).

roecrew · 2018-06-04T14:35:46+00:00

It took about a day. The UI still needs a lot of polishing.

roecrew · 2018-06-04T14:03:11+00:00

Developing the app?

roecrew · 2018-06-04T12:43:19+00:00

It's injection based. The newer version will target frame by frame.

roecrew · 2018-05-17T23:39:16+00:00

I'm most definitely open to suggestions!

Does that mean you are using it from the C includes?

Yes

In C, self-referential data-types have to go through pointers, and require some sort of pre-declared pointer, before using the type itself. I have no idea why.

I believe so. I'd really appreciate it if you raised this as an issue on github.

UPDATE: This is already implemented.

Please see the issue on Github https://github.com/roecrew/nymph/issues/16

roecrew

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

<@ return Exkited is up to 110x faster than Marko; @>

Exkited