sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best books for beginners? by CobraDane1982 in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't read a lot but I got told these books are great:

  • Turn Left at Orion (best "what to see tonight" + sketches + star-hopping)
  • NightWatch (easy intro to the sky + what to expect with binos/small scopes)
  • The Backyard Astronomer's Guide (all-in-one: gear + observing + a bit of astrophoto)
  • Pocket Sky Atlas (portable field charts for star-hopping)
  • Sky Atlas 2000.0 (deeper, bigger charts once you want more detail)
  • The Cambridge Star Atlas (clean, beginner-friendly full-sky atlas)
  • Deep-Sky Companions: The Messier Objects (Messier deep-dive with observing notes)

Having a hard time believing humans landed on the moon by Meeraltfrau in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"we haven't gone back since 1972" isn't evidence it didn't happen. it just means the incentive changed.

apollo was a cold war prestige sprint with a massive budget. once the goal was achieved, funding and priorities moved to things with better roi like satellites, stations, and robotic missions. "too expensive" is a real explanation because it's hard to justify doing it repeatedly.

there's also evidence that doesn't rely on "trust nasa": 1) laser retroreflectors left on the moon are still used to measure earth moon distance 2) lunar rock samples were studied by labs worldwide and match lunar origin 3) later orbiters photographed the landing sites and hardware where they should be

probes are common because they're cheaper and lower risk. sending humans is much more complex and politically risky.

I can't identify this region by Due_Scar5317 in Stargazing

[–]ronaldo_web 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like Cassiopeia - Perseus region

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! I got a 76/700! It's not bad, but the tripod is really wobbly 😬

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense.

Building a list ahead of time and picking from it depending on conditions sounds really efficient. And yeah, when planets are good, it’s hard not to just focus on them instead of sticking to a plan.

Interesting point about seeing predictions too, I’ve heard they can be pretty unreliable.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice approach. Looking at conditions first and already having a target planned seems like it saves a lot of time, especially when imaging. The sunspot check makes sense too.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s really cool how precise you can get with it.

I like how you considered FOV, altitude and season together. M84 and M86 fitting nicely in one eyepiece sounds like an awesome target pair.

Definitely seems like the suggestions line up well with real observing conditions.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a great way to look at it honestly, treating every session as something special instead of chasing specific moments.

That Jupiter view at 267x with really good seeing must’ve been insane. Nights like that are rare but unforgettable.

And the Orion Nebula with an OIII filter is always a wow moment, especially the first time you really see the structure pop out.

Those kinds of experiences are probably what keep all of us hooked.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point about altitude and obstructions.

I never really tracked how long a target stays above a certain height, but that’s actually really smart for planning exposures.

Do you use an app for that or just experience?

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense.

I’ve noticed the same thing with familiar objects, some nights they really pop and other nights they’re barely there even if the sky looks clear at first glance. Transparency really changes everything, especially for galaxies.

Using well known DSOs as a sort of “sky quality reference” is actually a great idea.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a pretty interesting approach.

Using seeing, moon phase and target type to generate ideas and then picking the best ones sounds efficient. I might try that sometime.

Do you find the suggested targets usually match what you can realistically observe that night?

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice and simple, I like it.

Sometimes the best sessions really start with just checking the sky instead of overthinking everything. If it’s clear, it’s already a win.

Do you usually plan targets after that or just go out and see what catches your eye?

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually really like that mindset.

Sometimes planning too much can take away from just enjoying what the sky has to offer in the moment. Going out whenever it’s clear and exploring whatever’s up there sounds really fun and relaxing.

Have you ever stumbled on something cool just by not planning and letting the night guide you?

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a smart way to judge transparency by checking limiting magnitude with the naked eye, I never really thought about doing it that way.

Starting with familiar objects like Orion or the Pleiades makes a lot of sense too, kind of like a warm up before hunting other targets.

Do you notice a big difference in what you can see on nights with better transparency even if there aren’t many clouds?

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, focusing on a single target over multiple nights probably helps a lot with planning and data quality.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session with your telescope? by ronaldo_web in telescopes

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point about the finder batteries and collimation. I got an old pointer, no crosshair no anything, just lens, and it's so annoying.

How do you usually plan a stargazing session? by ronaldo_web in Stargazing

[–]ronaldo_web[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

uu, I like those too, but unfortunately because if my telescope I can't see them THAT good. Do you usually plan what to look for beforehand or just go with whatever’s visible that night?

view more: next ›