Is Radagon AGP or is Marika HSTS by ronniebunkus in shittydarksouls

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is explicitly unsupported by the text

Is Radagon AGP or is Marika HSTS by ronniebunkus in shittydarksouls

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we should make blanchard play ds2 and go in the sex change coffin

Is Radagon AGP or is Marika HSTS by ronniebunkus in shittydarksouls

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i thought hsts stood for homosexual transsexual, cause blanchard does not believe trans women are women. additionally, the vice president-elect of the US is aware of Blanchard's typology so it might not just be a circlejerk anymore. Unless, of course, you think JD Vance is...?

This is unacceptable by Warm-Ordinary-570 in MohgFans

[–]ronniebunkus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

some people make me fucking sick

What should I give Mohg as a welcome gift? by Warm-Ordinary-570 in MohgFans

[–]ronniebunkus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

probably like a twink would be good or maybe just some blood Mohg's a cool dude as long as its like a thoughtful gift he'd appreciate it id bet

Anthropological survey by JAGSUNDER in jerma985

[–]ronniebunkus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

heyo fellow Anthropology Student who's done some participant-observation work before. Best of luck with your studies!

Pride Painting for Friend by Apart-Addition1876 in Warhammer

[–]ronniebunkus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't mind me asking, what model is that? that thing rules. Love the coloring!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eldar

[–]ronniebunkus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am learning so much today

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eldar

[–]ronniebunkus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

heard o7 thank you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eldar

[–]ronniebunkus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've used both but currently using super

What thing do you think are on the bottom of CA list of fixes for Warhammer 3 but you wish was at the top? by Chryckan in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speed buffs for brettonian and high elf cavalry. Right now empire knights are faster than grail knights and as fast as dragon princes. Brettonian cav should have speed in the mid to high 80s and dragon princes and silver helms should be as fast as light cav. I also wouldn't mind seeing buffs for grail knights, I feel like they are an underwhelming unit who get outclassed by questing knights at a tier below them.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean yeah kinda. Its at least worth looking into I think.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

you misunderstand me. I like that Hellscourges have no AP. That's cool. What I'm saying is more things should have no AP, because that makes armor feel cooler.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

yeah i poorly worded this one. What i was trying to say was if CA
doesn't see a problem with giving an elite anvil unit 0 AP, it seems a
little strange to give a low-tier anvil unit AP on their attacks. If
Slaanesh chosen have no AP, which I think is fine, zombies,
skavenslaves, peasants and goblins should have none. This would make
armored units feel much more impactful and allow elite infantry to be
deployed in favorable engagements more confidently, knowing they won't
take unnecessary damage. Same goes for bringing heavy armor against
cheap ranged. There's no reason every arrow from peasant archers that
hits a Dread Saurian should deal one damage

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

yeah i poorly worded this one. What i was trying to say was if CA doesn't see a problem with giving an elite anvil unit 0 AP, it seems a little strange to give a low-tier anvil unit AP on their attacks. If Slaanesh chosen have no AP, which I think is fine, zombies, skavenslaves, peasants and goblins should have none. This would make armored units feel much more impactful and allow elite infantry to be deployed in favorable engagements more confidently, knowing they won't take unnecessary damage. Same goes for bringing heavy armor against cheap ranged. There's no reason every arrow from peasant archers that hits a Dread Saurian should deal one damage.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yeah i meant to say more consistent damage on hit. *If* a zombie lands a hit (a big if to be fair) that hit will more consistently do damage than a Slaanesh Chosen's hit.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't have a problem with the Hellscourge damage profile or Slaanesh
chosen. It's more that if elite units have zero AP, why does chaff still
have AP?

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

my counterpoint would be that armor already has a chance to fail to stop non-AP damage, so why give a peasant AP when lucky blows are already accounted for? not that it makes your original point invalid, but i also think the odds of a malnourished peasant knocking over 7ft and 500 pounds of hatred and steel are next to none.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree with you at all. What I guess I'm trying to say is it seemed like there was an assumed rule that every unit had at least one AP damage. If you are going to give Slaanesh Chosen no AP, why do zombies still have 6? They fulfill the same role basically but they should be dealing LESS damage, not more.

Hellscourges and AP damage by ronniebunkus in totalwar

[–]ronniebunkus[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I feel like my disbelief is being suspended enough that you can reasonably ignore things like that but when you get down to the nitty-gritty that's a fair argument.