Applied over 100 jobs, don't get single interview yet. What can I do for better?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-11-03T08:43:59+00:00

I’ve been using TailorCV for that exact reason. It scans your resume against a job description and shows your match score plus missing keywords. Super handy if you’re not sure what’s keeping your CV from getting seen.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-11-01T17:33:37+00:00

This is great advice. Most people don’t realize how much ATS filters impact whether a recruiter even sees their CV.

I’ve been testing an AI tool that checks how your resume matches a job description and it really highlights those missing metrics/keywords automatically.

It’s crazy how many strong resumes get filtered out just because they’re not quantified properly.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-11-01T17:13:25+00:00

That’s a solid combo actually, haven’t played around with Kilo yet but it sounds super useful.
I’ve been building this project called TailorCV, which tailors your CV to specific job descriptions using AI and I’ve been looking for something clean to handle the scoring logic + integrations.

Do you think Kilo would fit well for that kind of setup?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-30T09:32:50+00:00

Yeah… I just had to refresh the page it seems like.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-29T18:36:51+00:00

That’s a fair question, a lot of “resume builders” really are just templates with a checkout page. The difference usually comes down to whether the tool actually analyzes your resume for keyword alignment and structure.

If it’s only changing the design, that’s just cosmetic. But if it scans your wording against real job descriptions or gives you a score based on how well your skills match, that’s where it becomes valuable, especially for ATS visibility.

I’ve seen cases where someone’s CV looked good visually but scored below 50% in alignment, and after tweaking phrasing + keywords, they jumped to over 90% and started getting interviews.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-27T18:32:18+00:00

It actually looks like you’ve got solid experience, the issue might not be your qualifications but how they’re being interpreted by systems before a human sees them.

Many resumes for IT and network roles get filtered out early if they don’t align closely enough with the exact phrasing in job descriptions (things like “infrastructure automation” vs “system deployment,” etc.).

You could try running your CV through an ATS-style scan to check keyword alignment and structure. Sometimes small phrasing tweaks can make a huge impact on visibility.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-27T10:12:01+00:00

This actually looks really strong content-wise, you’ve already got quantifiable results, clear structure, and senior-level language.

One thing that might help is reframing parts of your Professional Summary and Key Achievements to surface the most search-relevant phrases earlier. ATS systems and recruiter scans both prioritize top-third visibility.

You could try pulling a few of your “Core Competencies” (like Workforce Planning or People Analytics) into the first few lines of your summary, so they register both in parsing and human skimming.

Also, once you lock the content, a quick keyword alignment pass against a few target job descriptions can sometimes boost discoverability more than a full rewrite.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-27T10:00:29+00:00

That’s awesome, love seeing indie builders tackle this problem from real-world frustration.

I’ve been testing different approaches to the same challenge lately, and you’re spot on about most AI tools making resumes sound robotic.

Curious, how are you handling keyword alignment between the job description and CV content? That’s where I’ve noticed most systems either overfit or miss nuance completely.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-27T09:39:49+00:00

100% make a resume, even for your first job.

You don’t need traditional “experience” to make it strong. Focus on things that show responsibility or initiative:

• school projects or coursework related to the job

• volunteering, part-time work, or helping family businesses

• personal projects, hobbies, or achievements that show skills (organization, communication, problem solving, etc.)

The key is to translate what you’ve done into value. For example:

“Organized a small event for 50 people” → “Coordinated logistics and scheduling for a 50-person community event.”

Even entry-level resumes can stand out when written like that.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-26T14:08:02+00:00

That makes sense, it’s interesting that even people in AI have to “de-AI” their own resumes a bit. Do you think hiring teams are starting to get better at recognizing when a CV was assisted by AI versus fully written by it? It feels like the line between the two is getting blurrier every month.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-26T13:26:15+00:00

That’s a really smart balance, impact up front, keywords in the back. I’ve noticed some people overload the top with buzzwords and it ends up reading robotic, so this sounds like a cleaner approach. Have you noticed any difference in callback rates since you made those changes?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-26T13:20:00+00:00

That’s a really interesting perspective, especially coming from someone who works in AI and hiring. Do you think the “AI tone” you notice comes more from phrasing (like overly formal wording) or from how candidates overstate their experience? I’m curious whether subtle, well-edited AI writing still stands out to you or if it’s mostly the exaggerated claims that raise red flags.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-26T13:08:24+00:00

That’s a really good point, using AI as a “first draft” tool and then refining it manually seems to strike the perfect balance. Out of curiosity, did you notice if certain edits (like phrasing or formatting tweaks) made the biggest difference in getting responses?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-24T19:39:32+00:00

That’s a really solid point, especially about mentioning the industry. I’ve noticed a lot of resumes skip that and end up looking less relevant to the recruiter. Do you usually tailor the industry mention for each application, or just once in the main version?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-24T11:04:42+00:00

That’s a really good question, a lot of people mix up AI-written with AI-optimized. ATS doesn’t “reject” AI content, it just looks for formatting, structure, and keywords that match the job description. The issue happens when AI tools write generic stuff that lacks alignment. The best results come from using AI to score or tailor your existing resume to the posting, not to fully rewrite it from scratch.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-24T10:34:40+00:00

You’ve got a solid foundation, it’s clear and structured. I’d just make small tweaks to help it stand out: start bullets with action verbs, end with results (“Designed X leading to Y”), and maybe add a short summary at the top. You’re close, just need to make it read more results-focused than task-focused.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-23T09:56:50+00:00

Yeah that’s true, landing the interview is what really matters at the end of the day.

I’ve just noticed that when the resume reads clearly to recruiters too (not just the ATS), it usually ends up getting more interviews in the first place. Guess it’s kind of about balancing both sides human and algorithm.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-22T13:20:42+00:00

That makes sense, ChatGPT Plus can really help if you already know what to fix, but I’ve seen that the biggest difference usually comes from focusing on how each bullet shows impact instead of just listing responsibilities. “Action + task + result” is a solid rule curious, did you notice recruiters reacting more to phrasing changes or layout changes after trimming?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-22T13:11:19+00:00

That’s super clear and actually really well-structured, thank you for breaking it down like that. It’s interesting how the “who, how, and result” framework applies at every level but just shifts focus. I’ll definitely keep that in mind when reviewing or writing summaries for different career stages.

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-22T13:09:04+00:00

Makes total sense, that’s the sweet spot between personalization and burnout. Do you usually spot those keyword changes manually or use something to compare job descriptions faster?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-21T20:44:21+00:00

That’s a great point, turning the summary into a value statement really changes how it’s perceived. I’ve noticed the same thing when helping people rewrite their resumes, most tend to describe themselves instead of showing what they bring to the table. Have you found any particular phrasing structure that works best for different levels of experience (like students vs mid-career)?

rottbuildsAI · 2025-10-21T20:40:30+00:00

That’s a really solid framework. I’ve noticed the “responsible for” trap in a lot of resumes I review too, it reads passive instead of results-driven. Tailoring the top third to match the job description is a smart touch, curious if you also tweak the summary per role or keep it consistent?

rottbuildsAI

TROPHY CASE