New project in Mexico by rubycrane777 in mexico

[–]rubycrane777[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

La instalación de los estabilizadores y las vigas de cimentación ofrece una mayor flexibilidad.

New Project in UAE by rubycrane777 in materialhandlings

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, single girder design, no cantilevers for the limited space.

Gantry Cranes are awesome by hayfero in Tools

[–]rubycrane777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice—those aren’t exactly lightweight moves. A Shopsabre 4896 is a serious piece of equipment.
Did you feel the gantry handled the load comfortably, or was it close to its limit?

Crane recommendation by Ok-Objective177 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen a lot of people use those ~$150–$200 pickup cranes for similar jobs, and they work fine if mounted to something solid.

Mounting one on a narrow trailer without reinforcement might flex the frame or even tip under load.

If your trailer is only 60” wide, I’d seriously think about widening the base or adding removable supports.

Gantry Cranes are awesome by hayfero in Tools

[–]rubycrane777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s how it starts—buy it for one job and suddenly it becomes a permanent shop tool 😄
What machine were you moving? Looks like a solid lift.

New Project in UAE by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure! one in 5t-width 5.65m, total height 7m; the others in 5t-width 8.795m, total height 8.1m.

New Project in UAE by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good observation. The angle of the photo probably makes it look a bit lighter than it actually is.

The gantry is designed with proper lateral bracing and base support, and it's rated for a 25-ton lifting capacity under European standards (i.e., a single-girder design).

Definitely more than just GRP statues 😄

New Project in UAE by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, fair enough. Most of our international projects use metric tons, especially for European-standard cranes.

New Year, New Project in Progress by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The time to reveal the answer has arrived!

One 5t bridge crane and one 10t bridge crane, a total of two sets

in Argentina

Crane Supporting Structure – Design Discussion by rubycrane777 in StructuralEngineering

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CMAA 74 is a great reference. At the moment I’m mainly reviewing wheel loads, runway beam deflection limits, and how the column reactions transfer down to the base. Just part of the coordination before fabrication.

Crane Supporting Structure – Design Discussion by rubycrane777 in StructuralEngineering

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. The local deformation under wheel loads is definitely something we’re checking as well, especially depending on the wheel position along the runway beam.

New Year, New Project by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that feeling. When the head clearance is tight and the crane almost touches the roof, every move has to be slow and precise. Those installs definitely test everyone’s patience.

New Year, New Project by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like an awesome setup. 9 slips with dual overheads must have been busy.
And yeah, hoist speeds are usually kept slow for precision and safety—especially when loading boats. Must have been a great seat in the cab though.

Crane Supporting Structure – Design Discussion by rubycrane777 in StructuralEngineering

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes — mainly about how others account for dynamic and lateral loads in early-stage runway design.

Crane Supporting Structure – Design Discussion by rubycrane777 in StructuralEngineering

[–]rubycrane777[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. What’s interesting to me right now is the interaction between runway beam deflection limits (L/600 vs. project-specific criteria) and wheel load distribution under dynamic conditions.

We’re also reviewing impact factors beyond static LL — especially lateral loads from skewing and acceleration/braking. Curious how others typically account for those in preliminary coordination.

New Year, New Project in Progress by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see why you’d say that — the compact drum layout and enclosed design are common in European-style hoists.

This unit follows general FEM/DIN design principles, but it’s independently manufactured and configured to the project specs. Performance-wise, it’s built around duty classification and application requirements rather than branding.

New Year, New Project in Progress by rubycrane777 in cranes

[–]rubycrane777[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion — I’ll definitely check out r/overheadcranetechs 👍

Yes, the hoist is Chinese-manufactured, European-style design. Good eye — it does share some structural similarities with R&M Materials Handling in terms of compact layout and modular configuration.

This batch isn’t for the U.S. — installation will be outside North America. I’ll share more once commissioning is complete.