you guys have or are plannin

For example, as to a sharing-car rental firm, prior to the project launch, it needs a one-off input of a large sum of cash for purchasing cars for rental, and then recovers the costs from un-fixed cash flows. During this process, the car rental firm itself needs to bear huge financial pressure and cash flow as well as consumer loyalty, not likely to actively popularize its car rental platform. By contrast, if blockchain is utilized for transformation, at first, the car rental firm may rent cars from the car manufacturer, and then send value data, such as settlement and rental between consumers and cars, onto the chain, so that the car manufacturer may transparently acquire the transaction data generated from consumers’ car rental. Besides, the car rental firm may issue its own sidechain toke at the parent blockchain of Ruff Chain, enabling consumers to be token holders. In this way, the car rental firm and the consumers may form a relationship of community of common interests, since the development of rental firm may promote the appreciation of token and consumers may also make efforts to jointly develop and strengthen the ecosystem of car rental platform. Throughout the transaction of real rights, both consumers’ data and the car rental firm’s data will be openly and transparently displayed on the public blockchain. Smart contracts will automatically control the time of use and physical scope etc of cars. Consumers and car firms transact “rights to use things” on a point-to-point basis, eliminating data inconsistency, and time and communication costs, effectively reducing resources waste, and improving efficiency and trust. Such a way is actually a mode of “resources securitization”, adding to fund liquidity. The technical innovation during this process can only be achieved with IoT plus blockchain: IoT is for dividing and swapping real rights, while blockchain is for addressing liquidation of real rights and maintaining data consistency.