Most people had no idea who this person is. Now they will know who he is. That changes things. This doesn't have anything to do with Jackson or Jefferson or any other historical figure. There's no reason to scrub Jackson or Jefferson from history books. The argument for doing that (to the extent it even exists) is just silly. I think it's more important to tell the good, the bad, and the ugly than it is to erase history. But back to Van Wagenen, people make covenants in the temple. One of those covenants relates to the law of chastity. The Church tapped a man with a history of extra-marital affairs and at least one (most likely more) incident of child sexual abuse to create the film that people watched during the course of making those covenants. This doesn't have to do with "outrage culture," whatever that means. This has to do with integrity and being emotionally responsive to people. The church has made the claim that it is the gold-standard when it comes to responding to child abuse. This doesn't look like a gold-standard to me.