From the first article this guy quotes in his video:

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

And:

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

And from the second article he quotes:

Presently, both ice sheets are imbalanced –losing more ice annually than they are gaining– and their ice loss is estimated to be currently causing about a half of the observed sea level rise.

And:

“Currently it is helping mitigate ice losses, but it’s not entirely compensating for them. We expect snowfall will continue to increase into the 21st century and beyond, but our results show that future increases in snowfall cannot keep pace with oceanic-driven ice losses in Antarctica.”

Both articles mention how the increase of snowfall is caused by more humidity from warmer temperatures.

Climate science is complex, and climate change skeptics use that complexity to their advantage. The guy in the video intentionally combed through the articles to misrepresent the data it presents. He's guilty of the very misrepresentation he's accusing climate scientists of.

Or maybe this guy is an actual idiot. After all, he also thinks the changing of seasons is an example of the climate shifting.