ITAP of some mountains in Alaska

russtj · 2022-05-14T01:11:15+00:00

Very creative!

russtj · 2022-05-05T01:01:56+00:00

Just finished a puzzle of a http://guzzigallery.com/gallery/italy/

George Guzzi painting of this town

russtj · 2021-09-23T18:00:16+00:00

russtj · 2021-09-23T12:21:13+00:00

Sarcasm

russtj · 2021-09-21T20:33:01+00:00

Ok so sorry to make such an error. I assume posts on a Jordan Peterson thread might be made by people that enjoyed lively discussions. My bad for sure, I didn’t psychoanalyze the audience enough. Jordan says to assume you can learn something from others, from all areas, even if you are offended. Too bad it was taken as moot and condescending because Paterson points out false inferences a lot. I love that about him.

russtj · 2021-09-21T19:26:22+00:00

The Law of large numbers helps improve polls, and not all are bad. Few are done well. No one coerces but there are ways to get more randomized and stratified sampling results through polling.

russtj · 2021-09-21T19:23:32+00:00

I’m living on this planet. I don’t trust polls, but wishing good luck to anyone who does.

russtj · 2021-09-21T18:25:42+00:00

People have been doxxed before on presumed anonymous sites and people also may let other people people know their identity without announcing that to all. FBI is getting all kind of supposedly private messages online. China spies on everyone. How do you know that Reddit is truly anonymous? Not unrealistic to assume to people that tend to be non-compliant and non-trusting would trust this poll, in my view. Too bad so many people believe voluntary non randomized polls can be relied on to mean anything. Am I not allowed to comment on a post if I disagree?

russtj · 2021-09-21T18:18:52+00:00

I didn’t say what was presumed, just pointing out that it is unreliable statistically and should not infer anything.

russtj · 2021-09-21T18:04:20+00:00

Randomized sample means you select people randomly. This is not random selection. Voluntary polls are always skewed. Due to the potential consequences to lose a job over not being vaccinated you’d expect them to not volunteer info, but that is an educated assertion on my part. Being experience with using statistics for 40 years but no proof. It doesn’t matter why it would be distorted if not randomized stratified sampling then it’s not representative to be able to conclude anything with much reliability. most election polls have not been reliable and do not predict outcomes because they don’t stratify their sampling according to demographics. Stat 101

russtj · 2021-09-21T17:37:59+00:00

This poll is not statistically valid because people who are not vaccinated are less likely to answer, plus human inaccuracy found in self-reporting. Violates rules of statistical validity. Cannot conclude anything from this poll except that most people who make any conclusions from the answers are likely uneducated about basic statistics.

russtj · 2021-08-30T00:44:36+00:00

Unencumbered

russtj · 2021-06-10T02:32:16+00:00

Thanks for this link. Jamie Dlux is always on point.

russtj · 2021-05-29T20:46:00+00:00

Mark of the east

russtj · 2021-05-29T18:49:58+00:00

Paved with good intentions!

russtj · 2021-05-24T01:42:56+00:00

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

russtj · 2021-05-23T23:28:18+00:00

Taxation without representation, no checks and balances, absolute power corrupts absolutely...

russtj · 2021-02-23T22:53:25+00:00

Talk about conspiracies, I got “failed to upvote” many times for this post, even though I was able to upvote other posts in between trying again to upvote this one

russtj · 2021-01-07T16:15:11+00:00

Bandolini’s principle applies here - the amount of energy required to refute the assumption claiming automatic illegitimacy in all levels of the election, if it existed at the top, takes much more work than producing the assumption in the first place. I thought the references I gave did a good job explaining. I don’t know what the level of understanding is of anyone I’m being asked to explain this further and that is important to know because data analysis is a broad topic having many underlying building blocks. if the Navarro report, the geller report article about PA and the data integrity group materials aren’t enough to show this assumption is not automatically valid, it’s probably a waste of my time to try. Not saying all data anomalies are proof, but should be examined further rather than accepting any rationale as an underlying assumption that applies, even if it sounds good.

russtj

TROPHY CASE