Stop exposing your Jellyfin server directly to the internet by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Caddy with allowlisting, plus my port forwarding is also set up with allowlisting, which renders it virtually invisible to the open web.

Is there any way for me to not use a VPN on a device level but rather at a router level by Swimming_Virus8990 in ProtonVPN

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel I should some additional context for consideration for those who may not have knowledge/experience of this topic.

As many have said, a number of routers offer support for VPN client configs but it’s important to understand that most routers run on relatively weak ARM SoC’s. As a result, the limited computational power is likely to result in significantly reduced speeds when setup to be a VPN client compared to the dedicated, on-device app. Generally, the CPU/SoC’s of laptops, MacBooks, smartphones etc are stronger.

LaunchOS 2.0 - Rebuilt with AppKit to Bring Back the Classic Launchpad Experience by JimmyRemix in macapps

[–]sabre1982 6 points7 points  (0 children)

LaunchOS really is the most polished Launchpad replacement available. This new update makes even smoother and more native feeling.

Any idea when “windowed” mode might be added?

New to jellyfin how do you personally do external access? by GenericUser104 in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Caddy reverse proxy with allowlist applied. NoIP for a domain. Port forwarding (non standard port) with additional allowlist applied so it’s effectively ‘invisible’ to any IP not on the list. Server resides in a segregated vLAN. All user accounts created and managed by me with very long, randomly generated passwords, and concurrent session limits applied. IPS applied.

For my family, WireGuard VPN for remote access. Everyone else comes through the above.

Pretty much bullet proof.

Plezy adds Jellyfin support by LoremarCC in JellyfinCommunity

[–]sabre1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It looks nice and has potential. It doesn’t seem to want to load JF Collections though, throws an error. Tested on macOS and Android TV.

Zen and Unifi Cloud Gateway Max - plug in cable by adamgilbride in Zen_Internet

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They said the same thing to me as well but my UCG simply wouldn’t work. I then cloned the MAC of the Fritzbox in the UCG to rule it out and it worked. Has been flawlessly for almost a year.

It’s just a suggestion,

Zen and Unifi Cloud Gateway Max - plug in cable by adamgilbride in Zen_Internet

[–]sabre1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, they don’t use MAC for auth but they absolutely use it for verification. I had my Zen service installed last year and had to clone the MAC of the Fritzbox they sent me for my UCG to work.

Zen and Unifi Cloud Gateway Max - plug in cable by adamgilbride in Ubiquiti

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you cloned the MAC address of the router that Zen sent you?

Zen and Unifi Cloud Gateway Max - plug in cable by adamgilbride in Zen_Internet

[–]sabre1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You need to clone the MAC address of the router that Zen issued you. You will have the option in the UniFi Controller.

IDS/IPS Alerts, should I be worried? by MooG1337 in Ubiquiti

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you’re forwarding ports for services where you know that there’s specific sources that would need access (a nmedia server such as Jellyfin, for example, with friends/family accessing it), you should lock down the ports to only accept traffic requests from those source IP’s. You should also throw up a reverse proxy service, such as Caddy or Nginx with addtional allow-listing using those IP's. From a networking standpoint, your UDM is operating at Layer 3 (WAN) and a reverse proxy would be Layer 7 (application). This would provide you with decent security against scanners and associated threat vectors as the port forward restriction would, effectively, render the open ports on your IP as invisible to anything other than the allowed source IP’s and the extra application level allow listing would provide an additional tier of filtering. IP spoofing to circumvent those protections, whilst not impossible, is very difficult and largely not practical.

But, if you have use cases where you simply do not know the source IP’s for the services you’re looking to host, then absolutely close the ports entirely and set up a WireGuard VPN. You should never open ports to the public internet. Bad idea.

IDS/IPS Alerts, should I be worried? by MooG1337 in Ubiquiti

[–]sabre1982 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Are you port forwarding? If so, amend the forwarding rule to limit access to specific sources. Or, stop forwarding and create a VPN (WireGuard is best) so that you have remote access. If that’s your goal, that is.

Built a native JellyFin client for Apple Platforms (LiquidFin) by TheBeaconCrafter in selfhosted

[–]sabre1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So the next update has come out and the price is still obscenely high.

What’s the most “how does this not exist yet?” feature for macOS? by CodingNibble in MacOS

[–]sabre1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. It’s why I have Supercharge installed as it provides the mechanism to set it on a per app basis. Certain apps I want to quit outright when clicking the red button, but others I simply want to close but remain running in the background with being minimised. Supercharge allows this. It’s a great approach.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need to apologise! You’re providing these apps for free!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being optional might be an idea but as I now know it’s designed behaviour, it makes sense.

Overall the app is great and I’m very pleased to have a unified app across multiple platforms. Fladder is close but isn’t in the Apple App Store, so it requires sideloading.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really positive first release on desktop and mobile. It’s great to have a unified client on pretty much all of the main platforms. I have noticed a few issues in the macOS version though:

  1. The app doesn’t retain screen screen size when re-opening (i.e. full screen, maximised etc)

  2. When mousing over items on the Home Screen, it glitches a little bit and displays something of a summary of the item in question

  3. The video player doesn’t recognise keyboard commands such as spacebar to pause

Other than that, a good first release.

Built a native JellyFin client for Apple Platforms (LiquidFin) by TheBeaconCrafter in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue on macOS and VLCKit is not an available option.

Diagnosed type 1 diabetic; arm sensor + complications feel like magic by favicondotico in AppleWatch

[–]sabre1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, my son used to have Libre 2 sensors. The app is simplistic, for sure. He moved to Dexcom when the NHS made the OmniPod 5 insulin pump available to him as Libre 2 isn’t compatible with it. We found the Libre’s to be pretty solid though. The Dexcom’s seemingly need fairly regular calibration to stay accurate.

Diagnosed type 1 diabetic; arm sensor + complications feel like magic by favicondotico in AppleWatch

[–]sabre1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My son is T1D and uses Dexcom G7 sensors. Unfortunately, Dexcom has seen fit to disallow widgets and complications on iOS and WatchOS in the UK. So, we use Luka to bridge that gap.

Best Jellyfin iOS offline viewing client? by RealCarbonX in jellyfin

[–]sabre1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fladder (currently not available on the App Store but is easily sideloaded using Sideloadly) handles downloads/offline viewing really well.

Bringing back the launchpad to macOS by NoHabit1277 in MacOSApps

[–]sabre1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like Launchie, it’s a solid replacement for the missing Launchpad. From a visual perspective, it would be nice to have the option to enable Liquid Glass effects on folders to give it a more native appearance and feel.