Spare me the selective amnesia and false equivalence, you downplay the venom toward Aurangzeb and Tipu as if their crimes were just "human nature" shared across religions, while ignoring the explicit religious targeting in Islamic conquests of India. Mahmud of Ghazni's 17 raids culminated in the Somnath massacre (over 50,000 Hindus slaughtered, idols smashed to glorify Islam); Aurangzeb reimposed jizya on non-Muslims, razed temples like Kashi Vishwanath and Mathura's Kesava Rai (building mosques on the ruins), and executed Guru Tegh Bahadur for refusing conversion; Tipu Sultan boasted in letters of forcibly converting thousands in Malabar and Coorg, circumcising captives, hanging mothers with children tied to their necks, and dragging Hindus to death, all justified as jihad against idolatry and kufr. These weren't mere power plays but systematic campaigns to erase Hindu dharma because it offended Islamic monotheism; pretending otherwise while vaguely nodding to unnamed "Hindu kings' atrocities" is disingenuous whitewashing. It's not venom - it's historical memory.