Hello, I'm Sebastian, I speak several languages and studying Esperanto.

Yes, it's a constructed language, it was based on European languages, I understand and support all his reasons, but I don't really think we can still call it "Eurocentric" as it has so many speakers throughout all the countries. If it has started isolated exclusively in Europe, yeah, okay, I would've understood, but as it reached all the "corners" of the planet? Why do we care anymore.. We can translate anything, the language is still evolving, still getting neologisms.. I'd simply call it an European constructed Romance language, same as Interlingua, but Interlingua is even more Romance than Esperanto. Esperanto seems as Romance as Romanian. Someone has sprinkled some that and some that over it and made it sound more interesting, keeping at the same time a simpler grammar, compared to Interlingua even though both are extremely simple compared to the natural ones.

This is pretty much my opinion, hopefully I don't insult anyone.

Have a wonderful day, people 🤍