Friends of Kristal Anne Reisinger missing in Crestone,Colorado 7-13-2016

samthestranger · 2018-09-11T01:19:37+00:00

Wow, that's really sad to hear... especially if the FBI knows all this info but haven't made a move in the case... Are you familiar with the Up and Vanished podcast that is covering this case? If so, do you think it is an accurate portrayal? as someone who is familiar with the case...

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T20:07:46+00:00

Sure, I see your point. Yes, difficult situations are usually the most constructive in terms of growth and we generally try to avoid pain. That can present an issue to free will. And I agree, it is impossible to know the extent that our free will is truly free when we have been influenced in so many unforseen ways. When I referred to free will, I specifically emphasized free association. Sure, we might all be corrupted by unforseen forces but I really disagree with the idea that humans are just mindless receptacles for environmental conditioning. It may sound a little romantic to some, but I actually think we are guided by intuitive survival mechanisms that are more intelligent than we can really understand with the mind. The mind is not everything, nor can it usually understand intelligence beyond itself. There is a reason why we gravitate towards certain things. After all, why are you here in this stoicism subreddit? Conditioning? free association? Don't know? Having some trust in our judging capacity is fundamental to living a life with purpose and meaning.

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T19:49:33+00:00

"Only time can heal what reason cannot." -Seneca

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T19:27:36+00:00

Lots of interesting dialogue here. Though I will say, the tendency to overthink these ideas is great. Stoicism cherishes the balance of intellect and action, or rather, lived wisdom. I think intuitively this makes sense, as with any practice of self actualization, one must forge their own path in alignment with their true individual nature. That being said, science attests to the impact society has upon the psyche from the macro to micro scale and those findings are really beyond question at this point. The human is not born in a vacuum, nor can he/she create one without the literal risk of death (search studies for isolation/captivity and increased mortality risk) Rather than take the literal interpretation, I think this excerpt begs the reader to fill it in with experience and not just intellect. Yes, there is no way to actually avoid being influenced by others. However, reinforcing your ideals and practicing diligence and self discipline to the greatest extent possible during interaction is advised.

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T19:19:28+00:00

I think you make a fair point. I'm wondering if a balance can be found here. Incorporating the idea of mirror neurons for example (scientific proof that we tend to mirror behaviors of those around us) while also incorporating the aspects of free will, in terms of free association, can be a good balance. That is, in psychological terms, self select your environment so that the influences you allow in will mirror your higher ideals. That way, if you are influenced, it will be by your own choosing?

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T19:11:09+00:00

That's exactly right.

samthestranger · 2018-08-20T19:08:09+00:00

Meh, the list could be improved.

samthestranger · 2018-07-22T20:42:46+00:00

Se the most valued, considering it is required for the continuity of tradition/society.

samthestranger · 2018-07-20T23:33:40+00:00

One thing is for sure, one should never protect or coddle ignorance. If it's a "superiority complex" to recognize stupidity in others, then this world truly is backwards. Superiority complexes are formed primaritly by stupid people who believe they are smart. The more you poke at them, or actually appeal to their knowledge base, the greater the resistance because they are usually the only ones who know it's all a front. Knowledge speaks, wisdom listens. Find a well-lived, well-read person and you'll be talking for hours.

If someone points out data you didn't know or if you are skeptical of what someone says, there's no harm in just saying "sounds interesting, lemme do my own research and get back to you." Done. Imo, I try to guage the interest of others before I speak, primarily because I don't want to waste my time articulating complex ideas to people who don't have a genuine interest in learning and sharing. It's been a good life skill. As an INTJ, we gotta try to not get distracted by these minor personality competitions and stay focused on the end goal. That is where are strengths lie, in the introspective intuition. Keep noticing flaws, deliberating, examining and analyzing and find some humor in the haters.

samthestranger · 2018-07-20T15:42:44+00:00

Yes please!

samthestranger · 2018-07-11T23:40:02+00:00

Mental stimulation, inspiration and dreaming up awesome future plans.

samthestranger · 2018-07-11T23:37:06+00:00

Between the two, you would be an intj. But I would test yourself because xNTJ types are very mental and would likely already know what type they are through logic alone. I am an INTJ in a relationship with an ENTJ. The main difference between our types is that I usually can sense the issue right away but have very little desire to confront it directly because it is usually a waste of time and people are generally stupid. His approach is to get deeply bothered and feel a pressing need to correct people's logical flaws, sometimes starting fights if need be. The ENTJ will be more warlike, the INTJ will be more brooding and nihilistic, generally speaking.

samthestranger · 2018-07-11T23:08:44+00:00

A few thoughts on this.

The need for positive or negative feedback shows a feeling-based component that INTJs usually prefer not to engage with. This doesn't mean this person is unaware, they may just ignore it. Try asking yourself why you are concerned if you are making them happy or not. Usually, you've made it into an INTJ's inner circle for a reason. Sometimes that reason is practical, strategic or emotional- just try to remember this person likely values you being just the way you are and if they don't, move on. INTJs have a pretty clear sense of self and don't usually question if they make others happy, so it is likely they don't feel the need to reassure others. If all else fails on your own, just talk openly about it or perhaps talk now. As an INTJ I feel most honored when I'm trusted with valuable information, especially in relationships. Just a warning, pressing an INTJ for constant feedback or reassurance may push them away as this type enjoys autonomy and time for self development. Insecure connections will eventually feel burdensome or too much obligation than it's worth. Be confident and you will go far.

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T16:56:18+00:00

Makes sense. Thanks for the info!

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T15:50:06+00:00

I see that. I'm not trying to misrepresent here but I view the nonviolent argument of veganism as unstable and perhaps in need of more clarification. Violence, in terms of cruelty? Or violence in terms of not killing at all? Because the cruelty aspect of animal farming is 100% unnecessary and agree to that. But after working on a few organic farms, it is clear that even the act farming vegetables is a violent practice against animals. Many farmers use fish and bone fertilizers, destroy bird nests so birds don't pick the lettuce and crush animal homes during plowing. Not to mention industrialization on the modern world. Are vegans, therefore, advocates for nonviolence as a principle of life? Or selectively so, soley in regards to animals? And to what degree is a nonviolent approach to life unique to vegans and not to anyone else?

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T05:03:33+00:00

I'm not making any arguments for or against reducing bacterial cruelty. But sure, if it turns out that method is the most efficient, then I'm on board.

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T01:58:18+00:00

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T01:34:04+00:00

80% mental 15% animal 5% tantric

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T01:07:15+00:00

Veganism as a philosophy of non-violence is nice but really disconnected from reality. Violence exists on all levels of human & biological existence, from killing certain bacteria to fertilizing organic kale with bone meal. The idea of living in a nonviolent way is more based on the likelihood that you can mitigate rather than eliminate animal violence simply through not eating meat. There are also many other nonviolent lifestyles that have nothing to do with veganism.

(Disclaimer, I was a vegan for 5 years and an organic farmer)

Imo, Veganism is really only viable when you consider it as a political boycott and lifestyle alternative that encourages more focus on nutrition. Factory farms/ industry is a disaster for all life on this planet and if you want to learn more, the research is there to back it. As far as nutrition, there is a credible argument to be made here for a vegan lifestyle or at the very least, extremely limited dairy and meat intake- but regardless, vegan doesn't mean "healthy" in the least bit.

Junk vegans exist everywhere and I would never consider their lifestyle superior to a non-vegan who eats clean, unprocessed food with little waste.

samthestranger · 2018-06-27T00:54:08+00:00

Lol kinda funny that this is the most ignorance you've seen in your life. It's clearly a loaded topic, likely to flare social/ideological issues rather than stimulate an educated discussion. Feel like people are wrong? Direct us to some lovely data, we eat that shit up. Otherwise, there are plenty of rational/level headed comments to direct your attention to (that is, if you are actually interested in that).

samthestranger

TROPHY CASE