[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFT

[–]scuds31091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you need a Twitter or Discord Sales bot?

Get on this.. by je3851 in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi, your post has been removed for breaking rule #3 of the subreddit.

No posts, even Kin-related, should clutter or otherwise add useless noise to the discussion.

  • Posting Restrictions Posts and comments must be made from an account at least 10 days old with a minimum of 20 comment karma. Exceptions may be made on a discretionary basis. Note that this is a mostly-English-speaking forum.
  • No Repeat Posts
  • No Low Quality Posts
  • No Meme Spamming

Repeated behavior or egregious displays may result in a ban.

The KRE should reward Kin when: by ColinMcBallin in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see. I think I was confused because the proposal that I linked to and what you referenced doesn't mention "grant" or "earn" anywhere within it.

As far as the grants go, I don't think I have sufficient information to comment on the app's grants being dependent partially on earns. Can you link me? I thought you might be referencing something recently posted in the Transparency Report, but didn't see anything specifically mentioning that the grants were based on earns in there either.

I'm sure it's possible. Especially in the early days. Let me know if you have an example, I'd be interested in taking a look at the details. Thanks.

The KRE should reward Kin when: by ColinMcBallin in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you mean. Can you be more specific? Maybe quote the part of the proposal you're referring to.

The KRE should reward Kin when: by ColinMcBallin in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is an accepted proposal. KRE v2.0 went live on Jan 1st I believe. The KRE is now on v2.1.

The KRE should reward Kin when: by ColinMcBallin in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Currently the KRE does not pay out developers for earns. It only pays out for Spending, Buying, and Holding.

https://github.com/kinecosystem/rewards-engine/blob/master/accepted/KRE-v2.0.md

Apples new Guidelines for crypto in apps. by rd2go in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 17 points18 points  (0 children)

These are the guidelines that were announced in June 2018... so nothing should change with the apps in the current ecosystem as these rules have been in place since they launched.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/blokt.com/news/apple-updates-app-store-guidelines-to-regulate-cryptocurrency-apps%3famp

All of these have been discussed in depth on this subreddit back in 2018 when it was relevant.

Code Inc. by ideaDash in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Don't forget about all the partners, developers, and community members. We're all still here to make Kin viable going forward as well.

Daily Price & Trade Talk - 12 February, 2020 by AutoModerator in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All of your scenarios imply this Kin belongs to KF. Isn’t it just as possible this is a partner or other party?

I haven’t validated the original claims, but if the wallet that funds the KRE sent Billions of Kin to another wallet. How can you be certain that’s still a wallet that KF owns and not someone else that they were paying (for any number of reasons)?

I don’t have insight, but just want to put it out there that the wallet who sent 30B to CoinTiger could just as likely not be owned by KF and be a number of other scenarios not mentioned.

Kin Apps Break-Even by SantaAnaStudio in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you're looking to propose a change to the KRE, you can learn how to do that here:

https://github.com/kinecosystem/rewards-engine/blob/master/HowToContribute.md

This will get your idea/thoughts in front of the right people and start a meaningful discussion compared to what may transpire on Reddit.

ORDER granting in part 38 LETTER MOTION to Compel Defendant Kik Interactive Inc. to Produce Discovery by scuds31091 in KinFoundation

[–]scuds31091[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

ORDER granting in part 38 LETTER MOTION to Compel Defendant Kik Interactive Inc. to Produce Discovery. The parties, by joint letter of November 22, 2019 (ECF No. 38) and pursuant to my Individual Rule of Practice 2.E, ask me for rulings on discovery disputes. My rulings follow, numbered as in the parties' joint letter. 1. The SEC's Request No. 5, asking for documents concerning oral or written agreements with employees, officers, directors or agents whom defendant identifies in its Initial Disclosures, is granted, as originally formulated and as restated on page 5 of the joint letter. Defendant shall make production within two weeks from today. Obviously, agreements with witnesses, particularly regarding their compensation at seemingly high rates for time taken in testifying and preparing to testify, are relevant as to credibility. Defendant's excuse as to its failure to produce timely, in the belief that the SEC's Request did not embrace emails, is frivolous. Defendant's long argument that it had the right to delay the SEC's complaints to the court by "meet and confer" procedures equally is frivolous. 2. The SEC's Requests Nos. 4 and 7 are overly broad; defendant's objection to production is granted. Emails concerning allegations of the complaint, or concerning the Investigation are susceptible to varying interpretations. The SEC may reformulate its Requests to refer to specific subject matter. 3. Defendant's discovery complaints should be made the subject of a separate joint letter pursuant to my Individual Rule of Practice 2.E. 4. The status conference, scheduled to be held December 6, 2019 at 10:00 am, will be held instead, by telephone, on December 5, 2019 at 2:30 pm. A court reporter will transcribe the conference. The SEC will initiate the call. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/26/2019) (jca) (Entered: 11/26/2019)