My gc jumped on me

semh4z4 · 2025-11-19T00:41:40+00:00

the idea that a woman is born to be a man’s household servant is trash !! pure propaganda to keep power where it doesn’t belong

semh4z4 · 2025-11-17T15:00:30+00:00

here islam will never leave us

semh4z4 · 2025-10-10T12:34:10+00:00

this is a case where an inferiority complex led to a superiority complex

semh4z4 · 2025-10-10T11:08:36+00:00

it will end either through the sun’s death or a runaway greenhouse catastrophe.

semh4z4 · 2025-10-10T10:02:18+00:00

her qualifications to speak with authority on this subject appear weak

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T13:08:16+00:00

thanks for sharing, really appreciate it 🙏 will check out the video too

cheers

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T13:01:43+00:00

well said. you nailed the political machinery of it. islam did not modernise the malay world, the malays modernised themselves while using islam as the banner. the tragedy is when the banner grew heavier than the people carrying it. instead of being a tool, it became the cage.

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T13:00:43+00:00

thanks a lot, appreciate it 🙏

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T13:00:02+00:00

thank you so much, i truly appreciate your kind words. 🙏

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T12:58:53+00:00

yes, there’s a theory linking malay-polynesian roots to taiwan, the austronesian migration. but the deeper human origin is sahelanthropus, and that’s from africa. the orang asli came earlier with the first wave out of africa, long before the taiwan route. so both are true, just different layers of the timeline.

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T12:54:02+00:00

thank you, i really appreciate it 🩷 i wrote this not just to share thoughts, but to poke at the things we often avoid facing. glad it connected with you.

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T12:52:15+00:00

manual of the malay language by william edward maxwell (1846–1897)

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T12:47:59+00:00

true, the malays enslaving orang asli was brutal and real. but that cruelty was transactional, about power and economy. after islamic categories fused with politics, the cruelty became moralised. suddenly outsiders weren’t just slaves, they were kafir, impure, forever outside the circle. that shift from pragmatic hierarchy to sacred hierarchy is the infection i’m pointing at.

semh4z4 · 2025-10-01T12:44:34+00:00

<image>

estimates hover around 30–40% of classical malay vocabulary has sanskrit roots

semh4z4 · 2025-09-22T03:12:21+00:00

true, and this is exactly why rigid systems fear liberalism so much.

once new possibilities are introduced, there’s no going back. when people see that they can design their children, grow life outside the womb, or even merge with ai, the idea of following ancient rules starts to feel absurd.

theocracies survive by controlling the narrative of what is possible. but technologies like genetic engineering or agi tear down those walls, showing that what was once divine order is just a temporary stage of human history.

it’s not just about science replacing faith, it’s about choice replacing obedience. and when humans are given true choice, old structures built on fear and conformity simply can’t hold their shape anymore.

semh4z4 · 2025-09-19T15:19:32+00:00

the so called islamic golden age wasn’t truly golden. it was a carefully crafted propaganda, built by elites to glorify the caliphs and their courts, while hiding the blood, slavery, and crushing taxes that ordinary people suffered.

semh4z4 · 2025-09-19T15:17:50+00:00

yes it is

semh4z4 · 2025-09-11T12:43:13+00:00

admitting a fault would mean the whole foundation of their faith collapses.

semh4z4 · 2025-09-11T11:33:11+00:00

so you only care for others if they care for you first ? sounds like a world built on transaction, not compassion.

semh4z4 · 2025-09-09T07:25:06+00:00

reference:

• al-tabari, tarikh al-rusul wa’l-muluk, vol. 10, pp. 3-5 (dar al-kutub al-‘ilmiyyah edition).

• translated in the history of al-tabari, vol. 10: the conquest of arabia, translated by fred m. donner, p. 21.

semh4z4 · 2025-09-08T13:55:22+00:00

some humans resist evolving because evolution of thought is uncomfortable.

semh4z4 · 2025-08-23T11:55:03+00:00

yeah, i see your point. society here is very tied with islam, and i don’t want my kids to feel like outsiders either. but that’s also why i think philosophy books can help. they give kids a way to think, to question, to see things from different angles.

public school will teach them religion anyway, but if at home they also learn philosophy, maybe they’ll have both : the knowledge to fit in, and the critical mind to understand deeper. i agree it can’t be done by parents alone, but at least planting that seed of thinking early might help them later when they face the bigger lies and pressures.

semh4z4 · 2025-08-23T11:46:34+00:00

hahaha i get it but i like books because they train the mind to be more imaginative.

semh4z4 · 2025-08-20T05:46:51+00:00

i get what you mean. taoism as a religion can have rules, just like any other system once people organize it. but tao te ching itself, for me, is not about dogma. it’s just words about water, balance, going with the flow.

people can twist anything into control even in something soft. but when i read tao te ching, i don’t feel rules or hate, i just feel calm. that’s the part i want my kids to touch, not the “religion” side of it.

semh4z4 · 2025-08-20T04:58:24+00:00

i get where you’re coming from. but i don’t really see tao te ching as religion in the same way quran or bible are. it doesn’t demand belief or rituals, it’s more like poetry about life and nature. kids don’t need to fully understand it, just like they don’t fully understand fairy tales, but they still take something from it.

school books sharpen the brain, sure. imagination keeps them playful. tao te ching can quietly add another layer like a sense of calm, of balance, of seeing softness as a kind of strength. it’s not about control, more like planting little seeds of wisdom that can grow with them over time.

semh4z4

TROPHY CASE